From: "KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki" <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: vedran.furac@gmail.com,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
rientjes@google.com, minchan.kim@gmail.com,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] oom-kill: add lowmem usage aware oom kill handling
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 01:11:17 +0900 (JST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f8c9aca9c98db8ae7df3ac2d7ac8d922.squirrel@webmail-b.css.fujitsu.com> (raw)
Alan Cox wrote:
>> off by default. Problem is that it breaks java and some other stuff that
>> allocates much more memory than it needs. Very quickly Committed_AS hits
>> CommitLimit and one cannot allocate any more while there is plenty of
>> memory still unused.
>
> So how about you go and have a complain at the people who are causing
> your problem, rather than the kernel.
>
Alan, please allow me to talk about my concern.
At first, I think all OOM-killer are bad and there are no chance
to implement innocent, good OOM-Killer. The best way we can do is
"never cause OOM-Kill". But we're human being, OOM-Killer can happen
by _mistake_....
For example, a customer runs 1000+ process of Oracle without using
HugeTLB and the total size of page table goes up to 10GByes. Hahaha.
(Of course, We asked him to use Hugetlb ;) We can't ask him to
use overcommit memory if much proprietaty applications runs on it.)
So, I believe there is a cirtial situation OOM-Killer has to run even
if it's bad. Even in corner case.
Now, in OOM situaion, sshd or X-server or some task launcher is killed at
first if oom_adj is not tweaked. IIUC, OOM-Killer is for giving a chance
to administrator to recover his system, safe reboot. But if sshd/X is
kiiled, this is no help.
My first purpose was to prevent killing some daemons or task launchers.
The first patch was nacked ;).
On that way, I tried to add lowmem counting because it was also
my concern. This was nacked ;(
I stop this because of my personal reason. For my enviroment,
panic_on_oom=1 works enough well.For Vedran's, overcommit memory will work
well. But oom-killer kills very bad process if not tweaked.
So, I think some improvement should be done.
And we have memcg even if it's called as ugly workaround.
Sorry for all the noise.
Bye,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next reply other threads:[~2010-01-29 16:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-29 16:11 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]
2010-01-29 16:21 ` Alan Cox
2010-01-29 16:25 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-01-29 16:30 ` Alan Cox
2010-01-29 16:41 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-01-29 21:07 ` David Rientjes
2010-01-30 12:46 ` Vedran Furač
2010-01-30 22:53 ` David Rientjes
2010-01-31 20:29 ` Vedran Furač
2010-02-01 10:33 ` David Rientjes
2010-02-01 0:01 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-01 10:28 ` David Rientjes
2010-01-29 21:11 ` David Rientjes
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-01-21 5:59 [PATCH] " KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-01-22 6:23 ` [PATCH v2] " KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-01-25 6:15 ` [PATCH v3] " KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-01-26 23:12 ` Andrew Morton
2010-01-26 23:53 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-01-27 0:19 ` Andrew Morton
2010-01-27 0:58 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-01-27 23:56 ` David Rientjes
2010-01-28 0:16 ` Alan Cox
2010-01-28 0:26 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-01-28 0:59 ` David Rientjes
2010-01-29 0:25 ` Vedran Furač
2010-01-29 0:35 ` Alan Cox
2010-01-29 0:57 ` Vedran Furač
2010-01-29 11:03 ` Alan Cox
2010-01-30 12:33 ` Vedran Furač
2010-01-30 12:59 ` Alan Cox
2010-01-30 17:30 ` Vedran Furač
2010-01-30 17:45 ` Alan Cox
2010-01-30 18:17 ` Vedran Furač
2010-01-27 23:46 ` David Rientjes
2010-01-26 23:16 ` Andrew Morton
2010-01-26 23:44 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-01-27 23:40 ` David Rientjes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f8c9aca9c98db8ae7df3ac2d7ac8d922.squirrel@webmail-b.css.fujitsu.com \
--to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=vedran.furac@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox