From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Stefan Roesch <shr@devkernel.io>,
willy@infradead.org, zzqq0103.hey@gmail.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm: fix div by zero in bdi_ratio_from_pages
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2025 12:18:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f85f46ac-9893-4b6b-89a4-f5b0d435886e@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250108014723.166637-1-shr@devkernel.io>
On 08.01.25 02:47, Stefan Roesch wrote:
> During testing it has been detected, that it is possible to get div by
> zero error in bdi_set_min_bytes. The error is caused by the function
> bdi_ratio_from_pages(). bdi_ratio_from_pages() calls
> global_dirty_limits. If the dirty threshold is 0, the div by zero is
> raised. This can happen if the root user is setting:
>
> echo 0 > /proc/sys/vm/dirty_ratio
>
> The following is a test case:
>
> echo 0 > /proc/sys/vm/dirty_ratio
> cd /sys/class/bdi/<device>
> echo 1 > strict_limit
> echo 8192 > min_bytes
>
> ==> error is raised.
>
> The problem is addressed by returning -EINVAL if dirty_ratio or
> dirty_bytes is set to 0.
>
> Reported-by: cheung wall <zzqq0103.hey@gmail.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/87pll35yd0.fsf@devkernel.io/T/#t
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Roesch <shr@devkernel.io>
>
> ---
> Changes in V2:
> - check for -EINVAL in bdi_set_min_bytes()
> - check for -EINVAL in bdi_set_max_bytes()
> ---
> mm/page-writeback.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
> index d213ead95675..fcc486e0d5c2 100644
> --- a/mm/page-writeback.c
> +++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
> @@ -692,6 +692,8 @@ static unsigned long bdi_ratio_from_pages(unsigned long pages)
> unsigned long ratio;
>
> global_dirty_limits(&background_thresh, &dirty_thresh);
> + if (!dirty_thresh)
> + return -EINVAL;
> ratio = div64_u64(pages * 100ULL * BDI_RATIO_SCALE, dirty_thresh);
>
> return ratio;
> @@ -797,6 +799,8 @@ int bdi_set_min_bytes(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, u64 min_bytes)
> return ret;
>
> min_ratio = bdi_ratio_from_pages(pages);
> + if (min_ratio == -EINVAL)
> + return -EINVAL;
> return __bdi_set_min_ratio(bdi, min_ratio);
> }
>
> @@ -816,6 +820,8 @@ int bdi_set_max_bytes(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, u64 max_bytes)
> return ret;
>
> max_ratio = bdi_ratio_from_pages(pages);
> + if (max_ratio == -EINVAL)
> + return -EINVAL;
I would have done it slightly differently, something like:
diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
index d213ead956750..4b02f18f7d01f 100644
--- a/mm/page-writeback.c
+++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
@@ -685,13 +685,15 @@ static int bdi_check_pages_limit(unsigned long pages)
return 0;
}
-static unsigned long bdi_ratio_from_pages(unsigned long pages)
+static long bdi_ratio_from_pages(unsigned long pages)
{
unsigned long background_thresh;
unsigned long dirty_thresh;
unsigned long ratio;
global_dirty_limits(&background_thresh, &dirty_thresh);
+ if (!dirty_thresh)
+ return -EINVAL;
ratio = div64_u64(pages * 100ULL * BDI_RATIO_SCALE, dirty_thresh);
return ratio;
@@ -790,13 +792,15 @@ int bdi_set_min_bytes(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, u64 min_bytes)
{
int ret;
unsigned long pages = min_bytes >> PAGE_SHIFT;
- unsigned long min_ratio;
+ long min_ratio;
ret = bdi_check_pages_limit(pages);
if (ret)
return ret;
min_ratio = bdi_ratio_from_pages(pages);
+ if (min_ratio < 0)
+ return min_ratio;
return __bdi_set_min_ratio(bdi, min_ratio);
}
@@ -809,13 +813,15 @@ int bdi_set_max_bytes(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, u64 max_bytes)
{
int ret;
unsigned long pages = max_bytes >> PAGE_SHIFT;
- unsigned long max_ratio;
+ long max_ratio;
ret = bdi_check_pages_limit(pages);
if (ret)
return ret;
max_ratio = bdi_ratio_from_pages(pages);
+ if (min_ratio < 0)
+ return min_ratio;
return __bdi_set_max_ratio(bdi, max_ratio);
}
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-08 11:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-08 1:47 Stefan Roesch
2025-01-08 11:18 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2025-01-09 6:28 ` Stefan Roesch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f85f46ac-9893-4b6b-89a4-f5b0d435886e@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=shr@devkernel.io \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=zzqq0103.hey@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox