From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B68BC2BA4C for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 11:38:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id EE18E6B0072; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 06:38:10 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id E907E6B0074; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 06:38:10 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id D58F46B0075; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 06:38:10 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0206.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.206]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE19F6B0072 for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 06:38:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin04.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8144095192 for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 11:38:10 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79072239540.04.F9BB48E Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by imf12.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00AF340009 for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 11:38:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1643197089; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=4zTt96x21FPyYpL1kr/XqFOKlEFZ9A8N4Je0rIYyKZw=; b=FufLng9PAgF0DFF8ura6kjv0Z7sh4quw9WXKb1yfLWMNFlSr8wtfVQTXlahIfWDVGCUJZd NkdAJa8gbq4ebvWiw5CexK5ACsMTPKEOPaLaGeX1EM47eJgi6x0ozU15WK0BJh4DCw+mmS R8bBJue2u1P4vrCs4ifCpePxj4nLrfE= Received: from mail-wr1-f72.google.com (mail-wr1-f72.google.com [209.85.221.72]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-398-DNKd8M_xPg-Dyz4_RI1AuA-1; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 06:38:07 -0500 X-MC-Unique: DNKd8M_xPg-Dyz4_RI1AuA-1 Received: by mail-wr1-f72.google.com with SMTP id g8-20020adfa488000000b001d8e6467fe8so4174583wrb.6 for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 03:38:07 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:organization:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=4zTt96x21FPyYpL1kr/XqFOKlEFZ9A8N4Je0rIYyKZw=; b=0HlIrpnpFQdOxBh7ilP9w01lXCo1cS39DI69c8NhBEg6qXWs1pLu0GPGR7Dn8ymGtm qjVXXwnUqYUrDiB+03WKXob0nM4lQ3hwfp5SXOJdP8eDSIIfsXIbkZ0xfY7jUJ3QLnTh afDWzASxpLjct7d3al3D46ynHIrICIxsqLDoXXabwWdPYLmlVkbl3BmKO0uFumw2aRJ+ GLbuWVOqAZvwyAmbLlVdsFQNih4Nk68HFzzgjIeMVCPerbhbLop3CmhRuI+YMi3iOubO JPGWOJJtEht9cKbOmg+K5qbLnTNbmcvMPlf70OVDR72kffq9DUi4nzMI3TPzExkzabcN obgQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533FnvxVXJx4IyO1MjZ9jBENyewK5sGQCalLP5ga67Y2jP2RoHPd t1EXJAlu4PwF9StzJAjVwKoNqxFjNfVfguMW0Yosf5AXhyeytpy7MM8UvvsQXyYpe0FsoQOW5up fXK1oWBWLByo= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:2a6:: with SMTP id l6mr15380123wry.595.1643197086276; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 03:38:06 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwQjEjCimtjO9ghWkWhupm3vR4yG8ANOY5o/FUCBeUPWuqdBOuJJl88L+7Trx6ndDvsvvAIVg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:2a6:: with SMTP id l6mr15380103wry.595.1643197085990; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 03:38:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPV6:2003:cb:c709:2700:cdd8:dcb0:2a69:8783? (p200300cbc7092700cdd8dcb02a698783.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:cb:c709:2700:cdd8:dcb0:2a69:8783]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o8sm2749030wmc.46.2022.01.26.03.38.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 26 Jan 2022 03:38:05 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 12:38:04 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.4.0 Subject: Re: [v2 PATCH] fs/proc: task_mmu.c: don't read mapcount for migration entry To: Jann Horn Cc: Yang Shi , kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, willy@infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org References: <20220120202805.3369-1-shy828301@gmail.com> From: David Hildenbrand Organization: Red Hat In-Reply-To: X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Authentication-Results: imf12.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=FufLng9P; spf=none (imf12.hostedemail.com: domain of david@redhat.com has no SPF policy when checking 170.10.133.124) smtp.mailfrom=david@redhat.com; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=redhat.com X-Rspam-User: nil X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 00AF340009 X-Stat-Signature: 9moch13owgn5khdi5hyf3okphzrup19f X-Rspamd-Server: rspam12 X-HE-Tag: 1643197089-555426 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On 26.01.22 12:29, Jann Horn wrote: > On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 11:51 AM David Hildenbrand wrote: >> On 20.01.22 21:28, Yang Shi wrote: >>> The syzbot reported the below BUG: >>> >>> kernel BUG at include/linux/page-flags.h:785! >>> invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN >>> CPU: 1 PID: 4392 Comm: syz-executor560 Not tainted 5.16.0-rc6-syzkaller #0 >>> Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 >>> RIP: 0010:PageDoubleMap include/linux/page-flags.h:785 [inline] >>> RIP: 0010:__page_mapcount+0x2d2/0x350 mm/util.c:744 >>> Code: e8 d3 16 d1 ff 48 c7 c6 c0 00 b6 89 48 89 ef e8 94 4e 04 00 0f 0b e8 bd 16 d1 ff 48 c7 c6 60 01 b6 89 48 89 ef e8 7e 4e 04 00 <0f> 0b e8 a7 16 d1 ff 48 c7 c6 a0 01 b6 89 4c 89 f7 e8 68 4e 04 00 >>> RSP: 0018:ffffc90002b6f7b8 EFLAGS: 00010293 >>> RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000 >>> RDX: ffff888019619d00 RSI: ffffffff81a68c12 RDI: 0000000000000003 >>> RBP: ffffea0001bdc2c0 R08: 0000000000000029 R09: 00000000ffffffff >>> R10: ffffffff8903e29f R11: 00000000ffffffff R12: 00000000ffffffff >>> R13: 00000000ffffea00 R14: ffffc90002b6fb30 R15: ffffea0001bd8001 >>> FS: 00007faa2aefd700(0000) GS:ffff8880b9d00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 >>> CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 >>> CR2: 00007fff7e663318 CR3: 0000000018c6e000 CR4: 00000000003506e0 >>> DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 >>> DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 >>> Call Trace: >>> >>> page_mapcount include/linux/mm.h:837 [inline] >>> smaps_account+0x470/0xb10 fs/proc/task_mmu.c:466 >>> smaps_pte_entry fs/proc/task_mmu.c:538 [inline] >>> smaps_pte_range+0x611/0x1250 fs/proc/task_mmu.c:601 >>> walk_pmd_range mm/pagewalk.c:128 [inline] >>> walk_pud_range mm/pagewalk.c:205 [inline] >>> walk_p4d_range mm/pagewalk.c:240 [inline] >>> walk_pgd_range mm/pagewalk.c:277 [inline] >>> __walk_page_range+0xe23/0x1ea0 mm/pagewalk.c:379 >>> walk_page_vma+0x277/0x350 mm/pagewalk.c:530 >>> smap_gather_stats.part.0+0x148/0x260 fs/proc/task_mmu.c:768 >>> smap_gather_stats fs/proc/task_mmu.c:741 [inline] >>> show_smap+0xc6/0x440 fs/proc/task_mmu.c:822 >>> seq_read_iter+0xbb0/0x1240 fs/seq_file.c:272 >>> seq_read+0x3e0/0x5b0 fs/seq_file.c:162 >>> vfs_read+0x1b5/0x600 fs/read_write.c:479 >>> ksys_read+0x12d/0x250 fs/read_write.c:619 >>> do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] >>> do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 >>> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae >>> RIP: 0033:0x7faa2af6c969 >>> Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 11 15 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 >>> RSP: 002b:00007faa2aefd288 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000000 >>> RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007faa2aff4418 RCX: 00007faa2af6c969 >>> RDX: 0000000000002025 RSI: 0000000020000100 RDI: 0000000000000003 >>> RBP: 00007faa2aff4410 R08: 00007faa2aefd700 R09: 0000000000000000 >>> R10: 00007faa2aefd700 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007faa2afc20ac >>> R13: 00007fff7e6632bf R14: 00007faa2aefd400 R15: 0000000000022000 >>> >>> Modules linked in: >>> ---[ end trace 24ec93ff95e4ac3d ]--- >>> RIP: 0010:PageDoubleMap include/linux/page-flags.h:785 [inline] >>> RIP: 0010:__page_mapcount+0x2d2/0x350 mm/util.c:744 >>> Code: e8 d3 16 d1 ff 48 c7 c6 c0 00 b6 89 48 89 ef e8 94 4e 04 00 0f 0b e8 bd 16 d1 ff 48 c7 c6 60 01 b6 89 48 89 ef e8 7e 4e 04 00 <0f> 0b e8 a7 16 d1 ff 48 c7 c6 a0 01 b6 89 4c 89 f7 e8 68 4e 04 00 >>> RSP: 0018:ffffc90002b6f7b8 EFLAGS: 00010293 >>> RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000 >>> RDX: ffff888019619d00 RSI: ffffffff81a68c12 RDI: 0000000000000003 >>> RBP: ffffea0001bdc2c0 R08: 0000000000000029 R09: 00000000ffffffff >>> R10: ffffffff8903e29f R11: 00000000ffffffff R12: 00000000ffffffff >>> R13: 00000000ffffea00 R14: ffffc90002b6fb30 R15: ffffea0001bd8001 >>> FS: 00007faa2aefd700(0000) GS:ffff8880b9d00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 >>> CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 >>> CR2: 00007fff7e663318 CR3: 0000000018c6e000 CR4: 00000000003506e0 >>> DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 >>> DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 >>> >> >> Does this point at the bigger issue that reading the mapcount without >> having the page locked is completely unstable? > > (See also https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAG48ez0M=iwJu=Q8yUQHD-+eZDg6ZF8QCF86Sb=CN1petP=Y0Q@mail.gmail.com/ > for context.) Thanks for the pointer. > > I'm not sure what you mean by "unstable". Do you mean "the result is > not guaranteed to still be valid when the call returns", "the result > might not have ever been valid", or "the call might crash because the > page's state as a compound page is unstable"? A little bit of everything :) > > In case you mean "the result is not guaranteed to still be valid when > the call returns": > We're just collecting stats for userspace, and by the time we return > to userspace, the numbers will be outdated anyway, so that doesn't > matter. Yes, it's a snapshot. > > In case you mean "the result might not have ever been valid": > Yes, even with this patch applied, in theory concurrent THP splits > could cause us to count some page mappings twice. Arguably that's not > entirely correct. Yes, the snapshot is not atomic and, thereby, unreliable. That what I mostly meant as "unstable". > > In case you mean "the call might crash because the page's state as a > compound page could concurrently change": I think that's just a side-product of the snapshot not being "correct", right? > As long as we have our own mapping of the page, the page can't be > split, so this patch fixes that problem. -- Thanks, David / dhildenb