From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC3C6EB64DC for ; Sat, 24 Jun 2023 13:44:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id E13748D0002; Sat, 24 Jun 2023 09:44:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id DC32E8D0001; Sat, 24 Jun 2023 09:44:14 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id CB2C38D0002; Sat, 24 Jun 2023 09:44:14 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0014.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.14]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7A7A8D0001 for ; Sat, 24 Jun 2023 09:44:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin18.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay10.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C962C0131 for ; Sat, 24 Jun 2023 13:44:13 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 80937760386.18.9A836FD Received: from wp530.webpack.hosteurope.de (wp530.webpack.hosteurope.de [80.237.130.52]) by imf02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA68A80007 for ; Sat, 24 Jun 2023 13:44:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf02.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (imf02.hostedemail.com: domain of regressions@leemhuis.info designates 80.237.130.52 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=regressions@leemhuis.info ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1687614251; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Mq3RL6vvY/KkiwrM35GGlUWa3YtCmkZahJXuHYuu/7E=; b=ebACaEYYyZ+9hWCrNZQYMgP/AOTorK9amRvQDb5OtY1+f4K0C/R8p6qxC0Kvs6oEIvMA7U MBO0Q8AM0mON6B6J1ztimeeqwtZi14cx/HpLokgiGbGeF9qzl7AxRT8GdtcX9cUDQl/y9r 3K21lm+DJkKfUAo5Q1UdKdQdD5o5iHw= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf02.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (imf02.hostedemail.com: domain of regressions@leemhuis.info designates 80.237.130.52 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=regressions@leemhuis.info ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1687614251; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=oq9SU56bI0hn9KmOv+sTDQxX0aJ/4pOlBvg1YVCkinnimqPrz5IygoHeDVrotxGsFT/EFY CEtERdeUgTjWe+OUj3DqlsIoj+FPB75AfQJLoNWpfJA1RnKvOBr0eZlOBmwaqDyE1wPGjK thum2jkmDT9QdiXQcAi3CY3eoR9ghlE= Received: from [2a02:8108:8980:2478:8cde:aa2c:f324:937e]; authenticated by wp530.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) id 1qD3Yf-00060A-0M; Sat, 24 Jun 2023 15:44:09 +0200 Message-ID: Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2023 15:44:08 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.12.0 Subject: Re: Fwd: kernel fault on hibernation: get_zeroed_page/swsusp_write Content-Language: en-US, de-DE To: Bagas Sanjaya , Elmar Stellnberger Cc: Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Regressions , Linux Memory Management , Linux Stable References: <5d4959b7-61da-8ab0-6bc6-21305d37c7aa@gmail.com> From: Thorsten Leemhuis In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;regressions@leemhuis.info;1687614251;7aa1bd10; X-HE-SMSGID: 1qD3Yf-00060A-0M X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: AA68A80007 X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Server: rspam02 X-Stat-Signature: 8cht8emuk7cbyie3h4u6qyxjwg7cj1yu X-HE-Tag: 1687614251-243556 X-HE-Meta: U2FsdGVkX1/BXp3h/EUSCklezKPBkPaJ1GWZYlIV479ZvxB3wqHFmBHHpmMRW+5Hbn6nAFRZfY/nrqyX8UlFwNBS+s+O7vKgFq9HHZfuIxeG520y3K/0pI2jsiiLTGKjsGtoA9fN7EpNQcX5zpmzkZBkdrltv8wWimXN2Asbnh+EMaPZNc3Lm2Inxh0W+UjgtWe28PKcRbBD7DozhfgVXzVUfLC7wdfO0gx/iGAqyHlLOo5+vUTdgJ8ianrBums9+Qaiu8zSZtss2F9GX7GYnfyMbFBAfBOx4vYF6BjyPA5NLSuoP4AZEmGUJfrs3r0odzgd+QPwilifrbss5uBHiOZ+k5VnrnUbS/mjd0MSJcryjpCKDgzIyzLfdjwuCBdxaPNimEJKv6Y0DgX2//BZW5O2zo3sl4SVCSpOmbTOREvh4LxeaoXW+jrdjHFzw/PTlaC2joSxbz716iUSMmlLAiMzKyMXSj2CZfQBL0cWcFrGUQMJDr74IesnmiLTwx2EAAOrpK/B3vOLt6lzMbI2Am1FkkZ+qNMWXN+NkQzCbRzgzhbsKo0XmtYAspq2a6Qs2sRxkDcZfpk3btI8w1wQcw16kWVy5gKtWO/cNpNNVZIuTUt+v2UDA3paTzMIO+IqUpi77oCrTfGvJy/bV24EDLFIN3dPhRvDzfj59mMEwPNNeck+mBFgIHABKM2BFgiizfA8W/MQeYh2mLY4QTKreNV5b3w8KwLwpy2LK6nTNTY6Pf1w7ljoc5VpItFfDNs8DahvJK6r6n1ogqvc5qKM2h0jxms8mbFJRTHAQCqz5LaxVWS4cKSLDp6vrtwNTng3C1eDpSXg2rYvAq3M3fTwCl5gFmLL69qf3IGmJg36wWDKXWbp95Q6VL5mWKriiudvtP912CMVlj13YPnnXApt51Xuq+l+iLnhs6NVdTXYymilC7CZBPePf6G751eP/ptkhK+3g7NOUCd+6EYIshF 5Yjbk7Zs oZ3XswYSqO5fpLA5l8NSnJIozmMLFHrDAqMQZTAchnbpcLiyWgJxlHJs1HhNSgvkmo+PcrlF3lrhJF5F5JtbRSbFur3FeHPr/GqfL1dM+U9yS8PkUJZtY732YDmpRF3A8uYnYczvNyiUe8GvFyr086HRGRq6Eix5sogGA7sxOnfsOuGhLpelYLbKeVDIRkI07VERtHSiCdFgXLNhhHbsAwOWZpCxG8Mjrp0Av9m7l5KirVwbrOf89G76hLq4clPWpMGqUP3aY6P4y/BatUWhCg5j638zfJyNCpqzIG66q9LUROoDTUxjAQmg6KQa9zsHyMyHjmCs76/kmxbUcm5fGZkxkkQ== X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On 24.06.23 14:15, Bagas Sanjaya wrote: > On 6/24/23 17:21, Elmar Stellnberger wrote: >> Hi Bagas S., Hi all >> >> concerns: Bug 217544 - kernel fault on hibernation: get_zeroed_page/swsusp_write >> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217544 >> >> Bisection does not make sense here, since I can not reproduce the >> issue. Packing the kernel binaries and symbol files was meant to invoke >> gdb directly on the kcore: > > Thorsten: Should this be marked as invalid/inconclusive? Not as invalid, as there might be a real issue here; but it's hard to say, as among others it also quite possible that something else went wrong (compiler? hardware?). Someone would have to investigate. But given the fact that this happened with a stable kernel[1] and is impossible to reproduce, I suspect no developer will be motivated enough to do so. Then it's not worth tracking[2]: #regzbot inconclusive: impossible to reproduce Elmar, that's nothing bad. In case this turns out to be something you can reproduce and bisect, just let us know and we'll add it back. [1] see the sections about stable kernels https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/post/frequent-reasons-why-linux-kernel-bug-reports-are-ignored/ [2] side note: due to limited resources I consider to stop tracking all non-bisected issues in general (expect those that started to happen in mainline since the last mainline release) – or put them in a special category that signals "those are collected here JFYI until they are bisected, as the regression tracker due to limited resources for now can't keep a close eye on these" Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat) -- Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking: https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr If I did something stupid, please tell me, as explained on that page.