linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Cc: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>, Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, shakeel.butt@linux.dev, riel@surriel.com,
	baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com,
	Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, npache@redhat.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] prctl: allow overriding system THP policy to always
Date: Sat, 10 May 2025 00:42:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f691d2e0-5919-4581-8a24-1b543d798ae4@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250509164654.GA608090@cmpxchg.org>

>>>> - madvise
>>>>    The sysadmin gently encourages the use of THP, but it is only
>>>> enabled when explicitly requested by the application.
> 
> And this "user mode" or "manual mode", where applications self-manage
> which parts of userspace they want to enroll.
> 
> Both madvise() and unprivileged prctl() should work here as well,
> IMO. There is no policy or security difference between them, it's just
> about granularity and usability.
> 
>>>> - never
>>>>     The sysadmin discourages the use of THP, and "its use is only permitted
>>>> with explicit approval" .
> 
> This one I don't quite agree with, and IMO conflicts with what David
> is saying as well.

Yeah ... "never" does not mean "sometimes" in my reality :)

> 
>>> "never" so far means "no thps, no exceptions". We've had serious THP
>>> issues in the past, where our workaround until we sorted out the issue
>>> for affected customers was to force-disable THPs on that system during boot.
>>
>> Right, that reflects the current behavior. What we aim to enhance is
>> by adding the requirement that "its use is only permitted with
>> explicit approval."
> 
> I think you're conflating a safety issue with a security issue.
> 
> David is saying there can be cases where the kernel is broken, and
> "never" is a production escape hatch to disable the feature until a
> kernel upgrade for the fix is possible. In such a case, it doesn't
> make sense to override this decision based on any sort of workload
> policy, privileged or not.
> 
> The way I understand you is that you want enrollment (and/or
> self-management) only for blessed applications. Because you don't
> generally trust workloads in the wild enough to switch the global
> default away from "never", given the semantics of always/madvise.

Assuming "never" means "never" and "always" means "always" ( crazy, 
right? :) ), could be make use of "madvise" mode, which essentially 
means "VM_HUGEPAGE" takes control?

We'd need

a) A way to enable THP for a process. Changing the default/vma settings 
to VM_HUGEPAGE as discussed using a prctl could work.

b) A way to ignore VM_HUGEPAGE for processes. Maybe the existing prctl 
to force-disable THPs could work?

-- 
Cheers,

David / dhildenb



  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-09 22:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-07 14:00 Usama Arif
2025-05-07 14:00 ` [PATCH 1/1] prctl: allow overriding system THP policy to always per process Usama Arif
2025-05-07 15:02   ` Usama Arif
2025-05-07 20:14   ` Zi Yan
2025-05-08 10:53     ` Usama Arif
2025-05-08 20:29       ` Zi Yan
2025-05-07 14:57 ` [PATCH 0/1] prctl: allow overriding system THP policy to always Zi Yan
2025-05-07 15:12   ` Usama Arif
2025-05-07 15:57     ` Zi Yan
2025-05-07 16:09       ` Usama Arif
2025-05-08  5:41         ` Yafang Shao
2025-05-08 16:04           ` Usama Arif
2025-05-09  2:15             ` Yafang Shao
2025-05-09  5:13               ` Johannes Weiner
2025-05-09  9:24                 ` Yafang Shao
2025-05-09  9:30                   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-09  9:43                     ` Yafang Shao
2025-05-09 16:46                       ` Johannes Weiner
2025-05-09 22:42                         ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2025-05-09 23:34                           ` Zi Yan
2025-05-11  8:15                             ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-11 14:08                               ` Usama Arif
2025-05-13 11:43                                 ` Yafang Shao
2025-05-13 12:04                                 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-11  2:08                         ` Yafang Shao
2025-05-08 11:06 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-08 16:35   ` Usama Arif
2025-05-08 17:39     ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-08 18:05       ` Usama Arif

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f691d2e0-5919-4581-8a24-1b543d798ae4@redhat.com \
    --to=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=npache@redhat.com \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=usamaarif642@gmail.com \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox