From: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
To: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com,
maple-tree@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] cleanup maple_alloc related functions
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 08:41:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f4ba8107-bb9e-4475-ad90-ccf965104292@lucifer.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240925010305.bwosd6c57svzgwe7@master>
On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 01:03:05AM GMT, Wei Yang wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 04:03:35PM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> >On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 12:39:50PM GMT, Wei Yang wrote:
> >> Patch 1/2: some fields of the maple_alloc is not necessary to change, so we
> >> can skip some operations
> >> Patch 3: a valid alloc check could be hide in current code, so we don't need
> >> to do a separate check
> >> Patch 4: found on rare case where allocation would fail even has enough
> >> memory
> >>
> >> Wei Yang (4):
> >> maple_tree: clear request_count for new allocated one
> >> maple_tree: total is not changed for nomem_one case
> >> maple_tree: simplify mas_push_node()
> >> maple_tree: fix potential allocation failure even has memory
> >>
> >> lib/maple_tree.c | 26 ++++++++++++--------------
> >> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> --
> >> 2.34.1
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Andrew - Liam is away at the moment - could we hold off on taking this
> >series to unstable until he's back and had a chance to review please?
> >
> >It may be best to avoid taking maple tree changes other than urgent bug
> >fixes or the like until his return also.
> >
> >Wei - please hold off on series like this until Liam's had a chance to
> >reply to this thread. Thanks!
>
> Sure, let me know when it is ok.
Thanks, Liam should reply to the thread once he's back then we're good to
go :)
>
> BTW, I don't see Andrew has taken it in unstable. Do I miss the mail?
Yeah he's not taken yet, kind of getting ahead of things here - not a
comment on your series - more an act of time/resource management :)
Cheers!
>
> --
> Wei Yang
> Help you, Help me
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-25 7:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-24 12:39 Wei Yang
2024-09-24 12:39 ` [PATCH 1/4] maple_tree: clear request_count for new allocated one Wei Yang
2024-10-15 1:18 ` Liam R. Howlett
2024-09-24 12:39 ` [PATCH 2/4] maple_tree: total is not changed for nomem_one case Wei Yang
2024-10-15 1:20 ` Liam R. Howlett
2024-09-24 12:39 ` [PATCH 3/4] maple_tree: simplify mas_push_node() Wei Yang
2024-10-15 1:29 ` Liam R. Howlett
2024-09-24 12:39 ` [PATCH 4/4] maple_tree: fix potential allocation failure even has memory Wei Yang
2024-10-11 1:27 ` Wei Yang
2024-10-15 1:14 ` Liam R. Howlett
2024-10-15 1:29 ` Liam R. Howlett
2024-09-24 15:03 ` [PATCH 0/4] cleanup maple_alloc related functions Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-09-25 1:03 ` Wei Yang
2024-09-25 7:41 ` Lorenzo Stoakes [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f4ba8107-bb9e-4475-ad90-ccf965104292@lucifer.local \
--to=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=maple-tree@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox