From: Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@linux.dev>
To: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
"David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>,
will@kernel.org, aneesh.kumar@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
npiggin@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/mmu_gather: define RCU version tlb_remove_table_one() in CONFIG_MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2026 10:09:18 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f44fac08-771f-4619-b8a4-6ea740df424f@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260222004512.839-1-richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Hi Wei,
On 2/22/26 8:45 AM, Wei Yang wrote:
> Before commit 718b13861d22 ("x86: mm: free page table pages by RCU
> instead of semi RCU"), the page table pages will be freed by semi RCU,
> that is:
>
> - batch table freeing: asynchronous free by RCU
> - single table freeing: IPI + synchronous free
>
> This commit introduce a RCU version for single table freeing to support
> PT_RECLAIM. While it is not necessary to limit the RCU version only in
> CONFIG_PT_RECLAIM. It is reasonable to asynchronous free single table by
> RCU if CONFIG_MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE.
>
> This patch moves the definition of single table freeing in
> CONFIG_MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE, so we have both RCU version
> batch/single table freeing if CONFIG_MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE.
Thank you for doing this, but we can't do it right now.
See the latest version:
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/9c8c02df3f8742f6db927e787ab971fd0b5ac08a,
when the
HAVE_ARCH_TLB_REMOVE_TABLE is selected, the pt_rcu_head member
cannot be used.
Thanks,
Qi
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
> Cc: Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@linux.dev>
> Cc: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
> ---
> mm/mmu_gather.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/mmu_gather.c b/mm/mmu_gather.c
> index fe5b6a031717..6c1cbd9c717b 100644
> --- a/mm/mmu_gather.c
> +++ b/mm/mmu_gather.c
> @@ -296,6 +296,22 @@ static void tlb_remove_table_free(struct mmu_table_batch *batch)
> call_rcu(&batch->rcu, tlb_remove_table_rcu);
> }
>
> +static inline void __tlb_remove_table_one_rcu(struct rcu_head *head)
> +{
> + struct ptdesc *ptdesc;
> +
> + ptdesc = container_of(head, struct ptdesc, pt_rcu_head);
> + __tlb_remove_table(ptdesc);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void tlb_remove_table_one(void *table)
> +{
> + struct ptdesc *ptdesc;
> +
> + ptdesc = table;
> + call_rcu(&ptdesc->pt_rcu_head, __tlb_remove_table_one_rcu);
> +}
> +
> #else /* !CONFIG_MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE */
>
> static void tlb_remove_table_free(struct mmu_table_batch *batch)
> @@ -303,6 +319,12 @@ static void tlb_remove_table_free(struct mmu_table_batch *batch)
> __tlb_remove_table_free(batch);
> }
>
> +static inline void tlb_remove_table_one(void *table)
> +{
> + tlb_remove_table_sync_one();
> + __tlb_remove_table(table);
> +}
> +
> #endif /* CONFIG_MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE */
>
> /*
> @@ -320,35 +342,6 @@ static inline void tlb_table_invalidate(struct mmu_gather *tlb)
> }
> }
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PT_RECLAIM
> -static inline void __tlb_remove_table_one_rcu(struct rcu_head *head)
> -{
> - struct ptdesc *ptdesc;
> -
> - ptdesc = container_of(head, struct ptdesc, pt_rcu_head);
> - __tlb_remove_table(ptdesc);
> -}
> -
> -static inline void __tlb_remove_table_one(void *table)
> -{
> - struct ptdesc *ptdesc;
> -
> - ptdesc = table;
> - call_rcu(&ptdesc->pt_rcu_head, __tlb_remove_table_one_rcu);
> -}
> -#else
> -static inline void __tlb_remove_table_one(void *table)
> -{
> - tlb_remove_table_sync_one();
> - __tlb_remove_table(table);
> -}
> -#endif /* CONFIG_PT_RECLAIM */
> -
> -static void tlb_remove_table_one(void *table)
> -{
> - __tlb_remove_table_one(table);
> -}
> -
> static void tlb_table_flush(struct mmu_gather *tlb)
> {
> struct mmu_table_batch **batch = &tlb->batch;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-24 2:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-22 0:45 Wei Yang
2026-02-22 19:42 ` Andrew Morton
2026-02-22 23:51 ` Wei Yang
2026-02-24 2:09 ` Qi Zheng [this message]
2026-02-24 2:57 ` Wei Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f44fac08-771f-4619-b8a4-6ea740df424f@linux.dev \
--to=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox