From: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com,
usamaarif642@gmail.com, yuzhao@google.com, ziy@nvidia.com,
baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, baohua@kernel.org,
voidice@gmail.com, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com,
cerasuolodomenico@gmail.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
kaleshsingh@google.com, npache@redhat.com, riel@surriel.com,
roman.gushchin@linux.dev, rppt@kernel.org, ryan.roberts@arm.com,
dev.jain@arm.com, ryncsn@gmail.com, shakeel.butt@linux.dev,
surenb@google.com, hughd@google.com, willy@infradead.org,
matthew.brost@intel.com, joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com,
rakie.kim@sk.com, byungchul@sk.com, gourry@gourry.net,
ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com, apopple@nvidia.com,
qun-wei.lin@mediatek.com, Andrew.Yang@mediatek.com,
casper.li@mediatek.com, chinwen.chang@mediatek.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, ioworker0@gmail.com, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm/thp: fix MTE tag mismatch when replacing zero-filled subpages
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2025 10:49:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f2fe9c01-2a8d-4de9-abd5-dbb86d15a37b@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aNLHexcNI53HQ46A@arm.com>
On 2025/9/24 00:14, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 12:52:06PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>> I just realised that on arm64 with MTE we won't get any merging with the
>> zero page even if the user page isn't mapped with PROT_MTE. In
>> cpu_enable_mte() we zero the tags in the zero page and set
>> PG_mte_tagged. The reason is that we want to use the zero page with
>> PROT_MTE mappings (until tag setting causes CoW). Hmm, the arm64
>> memcmp_pages() messed up KSM merging with the zero page even before this
>> patch.
> [...]
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/mte.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/mte.c
>> index e5e773844889..72a1dfc54659 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/mte.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/mte.c
>> @@ -73,6 +73,8 @@ int memcmp_pages(struct page *page1, struct page *page2)
>> {
>> char *addr1, *addr2;
>> int ret;
>> + bool page1_tagged = page_mte_tagged(page1) && !is_zero_page(page1);
>> + bool page2_tagged = page_mte_tagged(page2) && !is_zero_page(page2);
>>
>> addr1 = page_address(page1);
>> addr2 = page_address(page2);
>> @@ -83,11 +85,10 @@ int memcmp_pages(struct page *page1, struct page *page2)
>>
>> /*
>> * If the page content is identical but at least one of the pages is
>> - * tagged, return non-zero to avoid KSM merging. If only one of the
>> - * pages is tagged, __set_ptes() may zero or change the tags of the
>> - * other page via mte_sync_tags().
>> + * tagged, return non-zero to avoid KSM merging. Ignore the zero page
>> + * since it is always tagged with the tags cleared.
>> */
>> - if (page_mte_tagged(page1) || page_mte_tagged(page2))
>> + if (page1_tagged || page2_tagged)
>> return addr1 != addr2;
>>
>> return ret;
>
> Unrelated to this discussion, I got an internal report that Linux hangs
> during boot with CONFIG_DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT because
> try_page_mte_tagging() locks up on uninitialised page flags.
>
> Since we (always?) map the zero page as pte_special(), set_pte_at()
> won't check if the tags have to be initialised, so we can skip the
> PG_mte_tagged altogether. We actually had this code for some time until
> we introduced the pte_special() check in set_pte_at().
>
> So alternative patch that also fixes the deferred struct page init (on
> the assumptions that the zero page is always mapped as pte_special():
I can confirm that this alternative patch also works correctly; my tests
for MTE all pass ;)
This looks like a better fix since it solves the boot hang issue too.
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> index 7b78c95a9017..e325ba34f45c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> @@ -2419,17 +2419,21 @@ static void bti_enable(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *__unused)
> #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_MTE
> static void cpu_enable_mte(struct arm64_cpu_capabilities const *cap)
> {
> + static bool cleared_zero_page = false;
> +
> sysreg_clear_set(sctlr_el1, 0, SCTLR_ELx_ATA | SCTLR_EL1_ATA0);
>
> mte_cpu_setup();
>
> /*
> * Clear the tags in the zero page. This needs to be done via the
> - * linear map which has the Tagged attribute.
> + * linear map which has the Tagged attribute. Since this page is
> + * always mapped as pte_special(), set_pte_at() will not attempt to
> + * clear the tags or set PG_mte_tagged.
> */
> - if (try_page_mte_tagging(ZERO_PAGE(0))) {
> + if (!cleared_zero_page) {
> + cleared_zero_page = true;
> mte_clear_page_tags(lm_alias(empty_zero_page));
> - set_page_mte_tagged(ZERO_PAGE(0));
> }
>
> kasan_init_hw_tags_cpu();
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-24 2:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-22 2:14 Lance Yang
2025-09-22 2:36 ` Zi Yan
2025-09-22 3:36 ` Lance Yang
2025-09-22 7:41 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-22 8:24 ` Usama Arif
2025-09-22 17:24 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-09-22 17:59 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-23 1:48 ` Lance Yang
2025-09-23 11:52 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-09-23 12:00 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-23 12:04 ` Lance Yang
2025-09-23 12:51 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-09-23 17:20 ` Lance Yang
2025-09-23 16:14 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-09-23 16:40 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-24 2:49 ` Lance Yang [this message]
2025-09-24 8:50 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-09-24 9:13 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-24 9:34 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-09-24 9:44 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-24 9:59 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-09-23 2:10 ` Wei Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f2fe9c01-2a8d-4de9-abd5-dbb86d15a37b@linux.dev \
--to=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=Andrew.Yang@mediatek.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=byungchul@sk.com \
--cc=casper.li@mediatek.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cerasuolodomenico@gmail.com \
--cc=chinwen.chang@mediatek.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=gourry@gourry.net \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=ioworker0@gmail.com \
--cc=joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com \
--cc=kaleshsingh@google.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=npache@redhat.com \
--cc=qun-wei.lin@mediatek.com \
--cc=rakie.kim@sk.com \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=ryncsn@gmail.com \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=usamaarif642@gmail.com \
--cc=voidice@gmail.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=yuzhao@google.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox