From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Donet Tom <donettom@linux.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>, Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
rafael@kernel.org, Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] Remove register_memory_blocks_under_node() function call from register_one_node
Date: Fri, 16 May 2025 11:18:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f23e8df8-5836-4ffb-83ef-d19c7c04947f@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e0ef6ae9348f46bcc135f0e6cb7663d763e40b72.1747376551.git.donettom@linux.ibm.com>
On 16.05.25 10:19, Donet Tom wrote:
> register_one_node() is now only called via cpu_up() → __try_online_node()
> during CPU hotplug operations to online a node. At this stage, the node has
> not yet had any memory added. As a result, there are no memory blocks to
> walk or register, so calling register_memory_blocks_under_node() is
> unnecessary. Therefore, the call to register_memory_blocks_under_node()
> has been removed from register_one_node().
It might help to throw in some empty lines to make this easier to read.
Patch subject should start with something like
"node:" or "mm:"
>
> Signed-off-by: Donet Tom <donettom@linux.ibm.com>
>
> ---
> v3->v4
>
> Addressed Mike's comment by dropping the call to
> register_memory_blocks_under_node() from register_one_node()
>
> v3 - https://lore.kernel.org/all/b49ed289096643ff5b5fbedcf1d1c1be42845a74.1746250339.git.donettom@linux.ibm.com/
> v2 - https://lore.kernel.org/all/fbe1e0c7d91bf3fa9a64ff5d84b53ded1d0d5ac7.1745852397.git.donettom@linux.ibm.com/
> v1 - https://lore.kernel.org/all/50142a29010463f436dc5c4feb540e5de3bb09df.1744175097.git.donettom@linux.ibm.com/
> ---
> include/linux/node.h | 6 ------
> 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/node.h b/include/linux/node.h
> index 806e62638cbe..8b8f96ca5b06 100644
> --- a/include/linux/node.h
> +++ b/include/linux/node.h
> @@ -137,15 +137,9 @@ static inline int register_one_node(int nid)
> int error = 0;
>
> if (node_online(nid)) {
> - struct pglist_data *pgdat = NODE_DATA(nid);
> - unsigned long start_pfn = pgdat->node_start_pfn;
> - unsigned long end_pfn = start_pfn + pgdat->node_spanned_pages;
> -
> error = __register_one_node(nid);
> if (error)
> return error;
> - register_memory_blocks_under_node(nid, start_pfn, end_pfn,
> - MEMINIT_EARLY);
> }
Can be further simplified
if (node_online(nid))
error = __register_one_node(nid);
return error;
>
> return error;
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-16 9:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-16 8:19 [PATCH v4 1/4] driver/base: Optimize memory block registration to reduce boot time Donet Tom
2025-05-16 8:19 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] driver/base: remove register_mem_block_under_node_early() Donet Tom
2025-05-16 10:10 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-05-20 10:05 ` Oscar Salvador
2025-05-16 8:19 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] Remove register_memory_blocks_under_node() function call from register_one_node Donet Tom
2025-05-16 9:18 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2025-05-16 10:58 ` Donet Tom
2025-05-16 10:10 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-05-20 10:06 ` Oscar Salvador
2025-05-16 8:19 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] drivers/base : Rename register_memory_blocks_under_node() and remove context argument Donet Tom
2025-05-16 9:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-16 10:11 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-05-20 10:07 ` Oscar Salvador
2025-05-16 9:15 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] driver/base: Optimize memory block registration to reduce boot time David Hildenbrand
2025-05-16 10:09 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-05-16 10:12 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-16 11:00 ` Donet Tom
2025-05-16 11:00 ` Donet Tom
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f23e8df8-5836-4ffb-83ef-d19c7c04947f@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=donettom@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox