From: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: willy@infradead.org, shakeel.butt@linux.dev
Subject: [PATCH RFC] mm: fix refcount check in mapping_evict_folio
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 11:25:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f1f6909c39ffac4c24ba7feed4a561a61cecd742.1723573450.git.boris@bur.io> (raw)
The commit e41c81d0d30e ("mm/truncate: Replace page_mapped() call in
invalidate_inode_page()") replaced the page_mapped(page) check with a
refcount check. However, this refcount check does not work as expected
with drop_caches, at least for btrfs's metadata pages.
Btrfs has a per-sb metadata inode with cached pages, and when not in
active use by btrfs, they have a refcount of 3. One from the initial
call to alloc_pages, one (nr_pages == 1) from filemap_add_folio, and one
from folio_attach_private. We would expect such pages to get dropped by
drop_caches. However, drop_caches calls into mapping_evict_folio via
mapping_try_invalidate which gets a reference on the folio with
find_lock_entries(). As a result, these pages have a refcount of 4, and
fail this check.
For what it's worth, such pages do get reclaimed under memory pressure,
and if I change this refcount check to `if folio_mapped(folio)`
The following script produces such pages and uses drgn to further
analyze the state of the folios:
https://github.com/boryas/scripts/blob/main/sh/strand-meta/run.sh
It should at least outline the basic idea for producing some btrfs
metadata via creating inlined-extent files.
My proposed fix for the issue is to add one more hardcoded refcount to
this check to account for the caller having a refcount on the page.
However, I am less familiar with the other caller into
mapping_evict_folio in the page fault path, so I am concerned this fix
will not work properly there, and would appreciate extra scrutiny there.
Fixes: e41c81d0d30e ("mm/truncate: Replace page_mapped() call in invalidate_inode_page()")
Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
---
mm/truncate.c | 12 ++++++++++--
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/truncate.c b/mm/truncate.c
index 4d61fbdd4b2f..c710c84710b4 100644
--- a/mm/truncate.c
+++ b/mm/truncate.c
@@ -267,9 +267,17 @@ long mapping_evict_folio(struct address_space *mapping, struct folio *folio)
return 0;
if (folio_test_dirty(folio) || folio_test_writeback(folio))
return 0;
- /* The refcount will be elevated if any page in the folio is mapped */
+ /*
+ * The refcount will be elevated if any page in the folio is mapped.
+ *
+ * The refcounts break down as follows:
+ * 1 per mapped page
+ * 1 from folio_attach_private, if private is set
+ * 1 from allocating the page in the first place
+ * 1 from the caller
+ */
if (folio_ref_count(folio) >
- folio_nr_pages(folio) + folio_has_private(folio) + 1)
+ folio_nr_pages(folio) + folio_has_private(folio) + 1 + 1)
return 0;
if (!filemap_release_folio(folio, 0))
return 0;
--
2.46.0
next reply other threads:[~2024-08-13 18:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-13 18:25 Boris Burkov [this message]
2024-08-13 19:58 ` Shakeel Butt
2024-08-14 3:15 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-08-14 3:27 ` Boris Burkov
2024-08-14 3:46 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-08-14 4:23 ` Boris Burkov
2024-08-20 8:00 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-20 14:00 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f1f6909c39ffac4c24ba7feed4a561a61cecd742.1723573450.git.boris@bur.io \
--to=boris@bur.io \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox