From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDA1BC433EF for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 12:25:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 587FA6B0074; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 08:25:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 510AD6B0075; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 08:25:22 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 362576B0078; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 08:25:22 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0013.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.13]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 205E96B0074 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 08:25:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin05.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay10.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC6FF1119 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 12:25:21 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79551360042.05.79BB513 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by imf12.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B42140032 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 12:24:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1654604720; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=+BkMDQZuNbOmLtpQeNhEv9Hz5yKGluY7VE08oBIu2Ig=; b=EeOMPlrekRlib72S+u9SG4spIoxBeaH/jHCj19Kf/dQjDe+3izzlety+4AnNqO3antCon6 9eXrU3KVFgysQyN3ch/KZk6TjpLGmGMwasw8egByGfaMy5y1oak6RGpCxtI3zE6PyETu4d mcKK+d+k3bmiGSRaEpwLRsQZjYzyOcY= Received: from mail-wr1-f70.google.com (mail-wr1-f70.google.com [209.85.221.70]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-570-38E0UDl7M5C_LW496lVvRQ-1; Tue, 07 Jun 2022 08:25:12 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 38E0UDl7M5C_LW496lVvRQ-1 Received: by mail-wr1-f70.google.com with SMTP id m18-20020adff392000000b0021848a78a53so1312716wro.19 for ; Tue, 07 Jun 2022 05:25:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:organization:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=+BkMDQZuNbOmLtpQeNhEv9Hz5yKGluY7VE08oBIu2Ig=; b=mvyet/wAdxvztpuh4VrOaXOiE4cNUPutPxgwgscVgd4NxOwvTnu+s4pax51a2i5hti L2GCx2hea+TgEFUsI+j7TRO2xg58hk7FDf0o1+qhhnb4y75PpIbv3LbbOZOhMH1jy9hN OTntW7rWBZ7AlHzqbJl4DZXL5yjN1V7oTdaW621sT3b396xOMwcE8UB75yAbZnkQv3Px DNkiciVZo0pe77axadGJ2MCSbcVyYSTCq70NDbRzZiVnXczpipxbLOcfIewWmnICvFVX AqCbjxqw7EwvlTEy4+1W0leK7dJ2Pm3RpwuthXQ7OxzP15Z5YKYL/oCIBOBt02hFk7xe Gbkg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531zMq0YG4r71icYGR8ZzPhm4QkEIatCPpH5mrfEyz0aWMpNh+QF htDa9oa7Kq5BjadWKj2GNGdIlEoVWc34CW3EyFB2T9yuJDcuEzis7vuDn9j4d5+8ZsqCAd98cTB LBg6tKoS05UM= X-Received: by 2002:a1c:f208:0:b0:39c:1282:3d04 with SMTP id s8-20020a1cf208000000b0039c12823d04mr28841119wmc.26.1654604711137; Tue, 07 Jun 2022 05:25:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwMUrgCzQBm+yVcNb8mYR2lLnuWwWS9cRpDp1JcqdwRxHeXNkz9aaogfYXuCC8mxqoLMwFOiA== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:f208:0:b0:39c:1282:3d04 with SMTP id s8-20020a1cf208000000b0039c12823d04mr28841072wmc.26.1654604710883; Tue, 07 Jun 2022 05:25:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2003:cb:c709:500:4c8d:4886:f874:7b6f? (p200300cbc70905004c8d4886f8747b6f.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:cb:c709:500:4c8d:4886:f874:7b6f]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c6-20020adffb46000000b0020c5253d90asm18213212wrs.86.2022.06.07.05.24.45 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 07 Jun 2022 05:25:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2022 14:24:43 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.9.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] mm: Ratelimited mirrored memory related warning messages To: Wupeng Ma , corbet@lwn.net, will@kernel.org, ardb@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, dvhart@infradead.org, andy@infradead.org, rppt@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, paulmck@kernel.org, keescook@chromium.org, songmuchun@bytedance.com, rdunlap@infradead.org, damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com, swboyd@chromium.org, wei.liu@kernel.org, robin.murphy@arm.com, anshuman.khandual@arm.com, thunder.leizhen@huawei.com, wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com, gpiccoli@igalia.com, chenhuacai@kernel.org, geert@linux-m68k.org, chenzhou10@huawei.com, vijayb@linux.microsoft.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org References: <20220607093805.1354256-1-mawupeng1@huawei.com> <20220607093805.1354256-4-mawupeng1@huawei.com> From: David Hildenbrand Organization: Red Hat In-Reply-To: <20220607093805.1354256-4-mawupeng1@huawei.com> X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Server: rspam07 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 8B42140032 X-Stat-Signature: nbw7hi7xtexnhk3ez3urwxsdns5chiuw X-Rspam-User: Authentication-Results: imf12.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=EeOMPlre; spf=none (imf12.hostedemail.com: domain of david@redhat.com has no SPF policy when checking 170.10.133.124) smtp.mailfrom=david@redhat.com; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=redhat.com X-HE-Tag: 1654604674-674707 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On 07.06.22 11:38, Wupeng Ma wrote: > From: Ma Wupeng > > If system has mirrored memory, memblock will try to allocate mirrored > memory firstly and fallback to non-mirrored memory when fails, but if with > limited mirrored memory or some numa node without mirrored memory, lots of > warning message about memblock allocation will occur. > > This patch ratelimit the warning message to avoid a very long print during > bootup. > > Signed-off-by: Ma Wupeng > --- > mm/memblock.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c > index e4f03a6e8e56..b1d2a0009733 100644 > --- a/mm/memblock.c > +++ b/mm/memblock.c > @@ -327,7 +327,7 @@ static phys_addr_t __init_memblock memblock_find_in_range(phys_addr_t start, > NUMA_NO_NODE, flags); > > if (!ret && (flags & MEMBLOCK_MIRROR)) { > - pr_warn("Could not allocate %pap bytes of mirrored memory\n", > + pr_warn_ratelimited("Could not allocate %pap bytes of mirrored memory\n", > &size); > flags &= ~MEMBLOCK_MIRROR; > goto again; > @@ -1384,7 +1384,7 @@ phys_addr_t __init memblock_alloc_range_nid(phys_addr_t size, > > if (flags & MEMBLOCK_MIRROR) { > flags &= ~MEMBLOCK_MIRROR; > - pr_warn("Could not allocate %pap bytes of mirrored memory\n", > + pr_warn_ratelimited("Could not allocate %pap bytes of mirrored memory\n", > &size); > goto again; > } Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand -- Thanks, David / dhildenb