From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>,
linux@armlinux.org.uk, ezra@easyb.ch, hughd@google.com,
ryan.roberts@arm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
muchun.song@linux.dev
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ezra Buehler <ezra.buehler@husqvarnagroup.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm: pgtable: fix NULL pointer dereference issue
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 09:11:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f15bd993-20de-41ae-8631-9ce557cd9d20@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250214030349.45524-1-zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
On 14.02.25 04:03, Qi Zheng wrote:
> When update_mmu_cache_range() is called by update_mmu_cache(), the vmf
> parameter is NULL, which will cause a NULL pointer dereference issue in
> adjust_pte():
>
> Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000030 when read
> Hardware name: Atmel AT91SAM9
> PC is at update_mmu_cache_range+0x1e0/0x278
> LR is at pte_offset_map_rw_nolock+0x18/0x2c
> Call trace:
> update_mmu_cache_range from remove_migration_pte+0x29c/0x2ec
> remove_migration_pte from rmap_walk_file+0xcc/0x130
> rmap_walk_file from remove_migration_ptes+0x90/0xa4
> remove_migration_ptes from migrate_pages_batch+0x6d4/0x858
> migrate_pages_batch from migrate_pages+0x188/0x488
> migrate_pages from compact_zone+0x56c/0x954
> compact_zone from compact_node+0x90/0xf0
> compact_node from kcompactd+0x1d4/0x204
> kcompactd from kthread+0x120/0x12c
> kthread from ret_from_fork+0x14/0x38
> Exception stack(0xc0d8bfb0 to 0xc0d8bff8)
>
> To fix it, do not rely on whether 'ptl' is equal to decide whether to hold
> the pte lock, but decide it by whether CONFIG_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS is
> enabled. In addition, if two vmas map to the same PTE page, there is no
> need to hold the pte lock again, otherwise a deadlock will occur. Just add
> the need_lock parameter to let adjust_pte() know this information.
>
> Reported-by: Ezra Buehler <ezra.buehler@husqvarnagroup.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAM1KZSmZ2T_riHvay+7cKEFxoPgeVpHkVFTzVVEQ1BO0cLkHEQ@mail.gmail.com/
> Fixes: fc9c45b71f43 ("arm: adjust_pte() use pte_offset_map_rw_nolock()")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - change Ezra's email address (Ezra Buehler)
> - some cleanups (David Hildenbrand)
>
> arch/arm/mm/fault-armv.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/fault-armv.c b/arch/arm/mm/fault-armv.c
> index 2bec87c3327d2..ea4c4e15f0d31 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/fault-armv.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/fault-armv.c
> @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ static int do_adjust_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
> }
>
> static int adjust_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
> - unsigned long pfn, struct vm_fault *vmf)
> + unsigned long pfn, bool need_lock)
> {
> spinlock_t *ptl;
> pgd_t *pgd;
> @@ -99,12 +99,11 @@ static int adjust_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
> if (!pte)
> return 0;
>
> - /*
> - * If we are using split PTE locks, then we need to take the page
> - * lock here. Otherwise we are using shared mm->page_table_lock
> - * which is already locked, thus cannot take it.
> - */
> - if (ptl != vmf->ptl) {
> + if (need_lock) {
> + /*
> + * Use nested version here to indicate that we are already
> + * holding one similar spinlock.
> + */
> spin_lock_nested(ptl, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
> if (unlikely(!pmd_same(pmdval, pmdp_get_lockless(pmd)))) {
> pte_unmap_unlock(pte, ptl);
> @@ -114,7 +113,7 @@ static int adjust_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
>
> ret = do_adjust_pte(vma, address, pfn, pte);
>
> - if (ptl != vmf->ptl)
> + if (need_lock)
> spin_unlock(ptl);
> pte_unmap(pte);
>
> @@ -123,16 +122,18 @@ static int adjust_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
>
> static void
> make_coherent(struct address_space *mapping, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> - unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep, unsigned long pfn,
> - struct vm_fault *vmf)
> + unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep, unsigned long pfn)
> {
> struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm;
> struct vm_area_struct *mpnt;
> unsigned long offset;
> + unsigned long pmd_start_addr, pmd_end_addr;
Nit: reverse christmas tree would make us put this line at the very top.
Maybe do the initialization directly:
const unsigned long pmd_start_addr = ALIGN_DOWN(addr, PMD_SIZE);
const unsigned long pmd_end_addr = pmd_start_addr + PMD_SIZE;
> pgoff_t pgoff;
> int aliases = 0;
>
> pgoff = vma->vm_pgoff + ((addr - vma->vm_start) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> + pmd_start_addr = ALIGN_DOWN(addr, PMD_SIZE);
> + pmd_end_addr = pmd_start_addr + PMD_SIZE;
>
> /*
> * If we have any shared mappings that are in the same mm
> @@ -141,6 +142,14 @@ make_coherent(struct address_space *mapping, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> */
> flush_dcache_mmap_lock(mapping);
> vma_interval_tree_foreach(mpnt, &mapping->i_mmap, pgoff, pgoff) {
> + /*
> + * If we are using split PTE locks, then we need to take the pte
> + * lock. Otherwise we are using shared mm->page_table_lock which
> + * is already locked, thus cannot take it.
> + */
> + bool need_lock = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS);
> + unsigned long mpnt_addr;
> +
> /*
> * If this VMA is not in our MM, we can ignore it.
> * Note that we intentionally mask out the VMA
> @@ -151,7 +160,12 @@ make_coherent(struct address_space *mapping, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> if (!(mpnt->vm_flags & VM_MAYSHARE))
> continue;
> offset = (pgoff - mpnt->vm_pgoff) << PAGE_SHIFT;
> - aliases += adjust_pte(mpnt, mpnt->vm_start + offset, pfn, vmf);
> + mpnt_addr = mpnt->vm_start + offset;
> +
> + /* Avoid deadlocks by not grabbing the same PTE lock again. */
> + if (mpnt_addr >= pmd_start_addr && mpnt_addr < pmd_end_addr)
> + need_lock = false;
> + aliases += adjust_pte(mpnt, mpnt_addr, pfn, need_lock);
> }
> flush_dcache_mmap_unlock(mapping);
> if (aliases)
> @@ -194,7 +208,7 @@ void update_mmu_cache_range(struct vm_fault *vmf, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> __flush_dcache_folio(mapping, folio);
> if (mapping) {
> if (cache_is_vivt())
> - make_coherent(mapping, vma, addr, ptep, pfn, vmf);
> + make_coherent(mapping, vma, addr, ptep, pfn);
> else if (vma->vm_flags & VM_EXEC)
> __flush_icache_all();
> }
Apart from that LGTM. Hoping it will work :)
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-14 8:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-14 3:03 Qi Zheng
2025-02-14 8:11 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2025-02-14 8:31 ` Qi Zheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f15bd993-20de-41ae-8631-9ce557cd9d20@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ezra.buehler@husqvarnagroup.com \
--cc=ezra@easyb.ch \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox