From: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/mm: Deduplicate test logging in test_mlock_lock()
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 15:00:58 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f1481870-56b1-48b0-b484-22eeb3b5ccf2@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250515-selftest-mm-mlock2-dup-v1-1-963d5d7d243a@kernel.org>
On 15/05/25 2:57 pm, Mark Brown wrote:
> The mlock2-tests test_mlock_lock() test reports two test results with
> an identical string, one reporitng if it successfully locked a block of
> memory and another reporting if the lock is still present after doing an
> unlock (following a similar pattern to other tests in the same program).
> This confuses test automation since the test string is used to deduplicate
> tests, change the post unlock test to report "Unlocked" instead like the
> other tests to fix this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/mm/mlock2-tests.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/mlock2-tests.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/mlock2-tests.c
> index 7f0d50fa361d..3e90ff37e336 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/mlock2-tests.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/mlock2-tests.c
> @@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ static void test_mlock_lock(void)
> ksft_exit_fail_msg("munlock(): %s\n", strerror(errno));
> }
>
> - ksft_test_result(!unlock_lock_check(map), "%s: Locked\n", __func__);
> + ksft_test_result(!unlock_lock_check(map), "%s: Unlocked\n", __func__);
> munmap(map, 2 * page_size);
> }
>
Acked-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
>
> ---
> base-commit: 82f2b0b97b36ee3fcddf0f0780a9a0825d52fec3
> change-id: 20250514-selftest-mm-mlock2-dup-277d586bb29d
>
> Best regards,
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-15 9:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-15 9:27 Mark Brown
2025-05-15 9:30 ` Dev Jain [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f1481870-56b1-48b0-b484-22eeb3b5ccf2@arm.com \
--to=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox