linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>, Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@linux.dev>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mike.kravetz@oracle.com,
	muchun.song@linux.dev, willy@infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] mm: Init page count in reserve_bootmem_region when MEMINIT_EARLY
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2023 10:30:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f144b910-cd9f-a571-ce9b-a0a8b509c28a@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230929083018.GU3303@kernel.org>

On 29.09.23 10:30, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 04:33:02PM +0800, Yajun Deng wrote:
>> memmap_init_range() would init page count of all pages, but the free
>> pages count would be reset in __free_pages_core(). There are opposite
>> operations. It's unnecessary and time-consuming when it's MEMINIT_EARLY
>> context.
>>
>> Init page count in reserve_bootmem_region when in MEMINIT_EARLY context,
>> and check the page count before reset it.
>>
>> At the same time, the INIT_LIST_HEAD in reserve_bootmem_region isn't
>> need, as it already done in __init_single_page.
>>
>> The following data was tested on an x86 machine with 190GB of RAM.
>>
>> before:
>> free_low_memory_core_early()    341ms
>>
>> after:
>> free_low_memory_core_early()    285ms
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@linux.dev>
>> ---
>> v4: same with v2.
>> v3: same with v2.
>> v2: check page count instead of check context before reset it.
>> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230922070923.355656-1-yajun.deng@linux.dev/
>> ---
>>   mm/mm_init.c    | 18 +++++++++++++-----
>>   mm/page_alloc.c | 20 ++++++++++++--------
>>   2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/mm_init.c b/mm/mm_init.c
>> index 9716c8a7ade9..3ab8861e1ef3 100644
>> --- a/mm/mm_init.c
>> +++ b/mm/mm_init.c
>> @@ -718,7 +718,7 @@ static void __meminit init_reserved_page(unsigned long pfn, int nid)
>>   		if (zone_spans_pfn(zone, pfn))
>>   			break;
>>   	}
>> -	__init_single_page(pfn_to_page(pfn), pfn, zid, nid, INIT_PAGE_COUNT);
>> +	__init_single_page(pfn_to_page(pfn), pfn, zid, nid, 0);
>>   }
>>   #else
>>   static inline void pgdat_set_deferred_range(pg_data_t *pgdat) {}
>> @@ -756,8 +756,8 @@ void __meminit reserve_bootmem_region(phys_addr_t start,
>>   
>>   			init_reserved_page(start_pfn, nid);
>>   
>> -			/* Avoid false-positive PageTail() */
>> -			INIT_LIST_HEAD(&page->lru);
>> +			/* Init page count for reserved region */
> 
> Please add a comment that describes _why_ we initialize the page count here.
> 
>> +			init_page_count(page);
>>   
>>   			/*
>>   			 * no need for atomic set_bit because the struct
>> @@ -888,9 +888,17 @@ void __meminit memmap_init_range(unsigned long size, int nid, unsigned long zone
>>   		}
>>   
>>   		page = pfn_to_page(pfn);
>> -		__init_single_page(page, pfn, zone, nid, INIT_PAGE_COUNT);
>> -		if (context == MEMINIT_HOTPLUG)
>> +
>> +		/* If the context is MEMINIT_EARLY, we will init page count and
>> +		 * mark page reserved in reserve_bootmem_region, the free region
>> +		 * wouldn't have page count and we will check the pages count
>> +		 * in __free_pages_core.
>> +		 */
>> +		__init_single_page(page, pfn, zone, nid, 0);
>> +		if (context == MEMINIT_HOTPLUG) {
>> +			init_page_count(page);
>>   			__SetPageReserved(page);
> 
> Rather than calling init_page_count() and __SetPageReserved() for
> MEMINIT_HOTPLUG you can set flags to INIT_PAGE_COUNT | INIT_PAGE_RESERVED
> an call __init_single_page() after the check for MEMINIT_HOTPLUG.
> 
> But more generally, I wonder if we have to differentiate HOTPLUG here at all.
> @David, can you comment please?

There are a lot of details to that, and I'll share some I can briefly think of.

1) __SetPageReserved()

I tried removing that a while ago, but there was a blocker (IIRC something about
ZONE_DEVICE). I still have the patches at [1] and I could probably take a look
if that blocker still exists (I recall that something changed at some point, but
I never had the time to follow up).

But once we stop setting the pages reserved, we might run into issues with ...


2) init_page_count()

virtio-mem, XEN balloon and HV-balloon add memory blocks that can contain holes.
set_online_page_callback() is used to intercept memory onlining and to expose
only the pages that are not holes to the buddy: calling generic_online_page() on !hole.

Holes are PageReserved but with an initialized page count. Memory offlining will fail on
PageReserved pages -- has_unmovable_pages().


At least virtio-mem clears the PageReserved flag of holes when onlining memory,
and currently relies in the page count to be reasonable (so memory offlining can work).

static void virtio_mem_set_fake_offline(unsigned long pfn,
					unsigned long nr_pages, bool onlined)
{
	page_offline_begin();
	for (; nr_pages--; pfn++) {
		struct page *page = pfn_to_page(pfn);

		__SetPageOffline(page);
		if (!onlined) {
			SetPageDirty(page);
			/* FIXME: remove after cleanups */
			ClearPageReserved(page);
		}
	}
	page_offline_end();
}


For virtio-mem, we could initialize the page count there instead. The other PV drivers
might require a bit more thought.


[1] https://github.com/davidhildenbrand/linux/tree/online_reserved_cleanup

> 
>> +		}
>>   
>>   		/*
>>   		 * Usually, we want to mark the pageblock MIGRATE_MOVABLE,
>> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
>> index 06be8821d833..b868caabe8dc 100644
>> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
>> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
>> @@ -1285,18 +1285,22 @@ void __free_pages_core(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
>>   	unsigned int loop;
>>   
>>   	/*
>> -	 * When initializing the memmap, __init_single_page() sets the refcount
>> -	 * of all pages to 1 ("allocated"/"not free"). We have to set the
>> -	 * refcount of all involved pages to 0.
>> +	 * When initializing the memmap, memmap_init_range sets the refcount
>> +	 * of all pages to 1 ("reserved" and "free") in hotplug context. We
>> +	 * have to set the refcount of all involved pages to 0. Otherwise,
>> +	 * we don't do it, as reserve_bootmem_region only set the refcount on
>> +	 * reserve region ("reserved") in early context.
>>   	 */
> 
> Again, why hotplug and early init should be different?
> 
>> -	prefetchw(p);
>> -	for (loop = 0; loop < (nr_pages - 1); loop++, p++) {
>> -		prefetchw(p + 1);
>> +	if (page_count(page)) {
>> +		prefetchw(p);
>> +		for (loop = 0; loop < (nr_pages - 1); loop++, p++) {
>> +			prefetchw(p + 1);
>> +			__ClearPageReserved(p);
>> +			set_page_count(p, 0);
>> +		}
>>   		__ClearPageReserved(p);
>>   		set_page_count(p, 0);

That looks wrong. if the page count would by pure luck be 0 already for hotplugged memory,
you wouldn't clear the reserved flag.

These changes make me a bit nervous.

-- 
Cheers,

David / dhildenb



  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-10-02  8:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-28  8:33 [PATCH v4 0/2] mm: Don't set and reset page count in MEMINIT_EARLY Yajun Deng
2023-09-28  8:33 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] mm: pass page count and reserved to __init_single_page Yajun Deng
2023-09-29  8:19   ` Mike Rapoport
2023-09-29  9:37     ` Yajun Deng
2023-09-28  8:33 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] mm: Init page count in reserve_bootmem_region when MEMINIT_EARLY Yajun Deng
2023-09-29  8:30   ` Mike Rapoport
2023-09-29  9:50     ` Yajun Deng
2023-09-29 10:02       ` Mike Rapoport
2023-09-29 10:27         ` Yajun Deng
2023-10-01 18:59           ` Mike Rapoport
2023-10-02  7:03             ` Yajun Deng
2023-10-02  8:47               ` Mike Rapoport
2023-10-02  8:56                 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-10-02 11:10                   ` Mike Rapoport
2023-10-02 11:25                     ` David Hildenbrand
2023-10-03 14:38                       ` Yajun Deng
2023-10-05  5:06                         ` Mike Rapoport
2023-10-05 14:04                           ` Yajun Deng
2023-10-12  9:19                             ` Mike Rapoport
2023-10-12  9:36                               ` Yajun Deng
2023-10-02  8:30     ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2023-10-08  8:57       ` Yajun Deng
2023-10-10  2:31         ` Yajun Deng
2023-10-12  9:23           ` David Hildenbrand
2023-10-12  9:53             ` Yajun Deng
2023-10-13  8:48               ` Mike Rapoport
2023-10-13  9:29                 ` Yajun Deng
2023-10-16  6:33                   ` Mike Rapoport
2023-10-16  8:10                     ` Yajun Deng
2023-10-16  8:16                       ` David Hildenbrand
2023-10-16  8:32                         ` Yajun Deng
2023-10-16  8:36                           ` David Hildenbrand
2023-10-16 10:17                             ` Yajun Deng
2023-10-17  9:58                               ` Yajun Deng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f144b910-cd9f-a571-ce9b-a0a8b509c28a@redhat.com \
    --to=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=yajun.deng@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox