linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
To: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
	"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@suse.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	muchun.song@linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/sparse: fix comment for section map alignment
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2026 12:33:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ef9eaaf5-ff2c-4919-8e50-eb0e3c7d126a@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260402102320.3617578-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com>

On 4/2/26 12:23, Muchun Song wrote:
> The comment in mmzone.h currently details exhaustive per-architecture
> bit-width lists and explains alignment using min(PAGE_SHIFT,
> PFN_SECTION_SHIFT). Such details risk falling out of date over time
> and may inadvertently be left un-updated.
> 
> We always expect a single section to cover full pages. Therefore,
> we can safely assume that PFN_SECTION_SHIFT is large enough to
> accommodate SECTION_MAP_LAST_BIT. We use BUILD_BUG_ON() to ensure this.
> 
> Update the comment to accurately reflect this consensus, making it
> clear that we rely on a single section covering full pages.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
> ---
> v1 -> v2:
>  - Drop the actual BUILD_BUG_ON logic modification (keeping the simple
>    comparison) and only simplify/clarify the mmzone.h comment.
>  - Add explanation explicitly noting that a single section is always
>    expected to cover full pages, per discussions with David Hildenbrand
>    and Andrew Morton.
> ---
>  include/linux/mmzone.h | 25 ++++++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> index 7de42be81d4b..a071f1a0e242 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> @@ -2056,21 +2056,16 @@ static inline struct mem_section *__nr_to_section(unsigned long nr)
>  extern size_t mem_section_usage_size(void);
>  
>  /*
> - * We use the lower bits of the mem_map pointer to store
> - * a little bit of information.  The pointer is calculated
> - * as mem_map - section_nr_to_pfn(pnum).  The result is
> - * aligned to the minimum alignment of the two values:
> - *   1. All mem_map arrays are page-aligned.
> - *   2. section_nr_to_pfn() always clears PFN_SECTION_SHIFT
> - *      lowest bits.  PFN_SECTION_SHIFT is arch-specific
> - *      (equal SECTION_SIZE_BITS - PAGE_SHIFT), and the
> - *      worst combination is powerpc with 256k pages,
> - *      which results in PFN_SECTION_SHIFT equal 6.
> - * To sum it up, at least 6 bits are available on all architectures.
> - * However, we can exceed 6 bits on some other architectures except
> - * powerpc (e.g. 15 bits are available on x86_64, 13 bits are available
> - * with the worst case of 64K pages on arm64) if we make sure the
> - * exceeded bit is not applicable to powerpc.
> + * We use the lower bits of the mem_map pointer to store a little bit of
> + * information. The pointer is calculated as mem_map - section_nr_to_pfn().
> + * The result is aligned to the minimum alignment of the two values:
> + *
> + * 1. All mem_map arrays are page-aligned.
> + * 2. section_nr_to_pfn() always clears PFN_SECTION_SHIFT lowest bits.
> + *
> + * We always expect a single section to cover full pages. Therefore,
> + * we can safely assume that PFN_SECTION_SHIFT is large enough to
> + * accommodate SECTION_MAP_LAST_BIT. We use BUILD_BUG_ON() to ensure this.
>   */
>  enum {
>  	SECTION_MARKED_PRESENT_BIT,

Thanks!

Acked-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@kernel.org>

-- 
Cheers,

David


      reply	other threads:[~2026-04-02 10:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-02 10:23 Muchun Song
2026-04-02 10:33 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm) [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ef9eaaf5-ff2c-4919-8e50-eb0e3c7d126a@kernel.org \
    --to=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=ptesarik@suse.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox