linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	 Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	 Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/slub: disable user tracing for kmemleak caches by default
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 11:41:07 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ef5c2539-735-42ef-89e0-ef142da415cd@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210113215114.d94efa13ba30.I117b6764e725b3192318bbcf4269b13b709539ae@changeid>

On Wed, 13 Jan 2021, Johannes Berg wrote:

> From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
> 
> If kmemleak is enabled, it uses a kmem cache for its own objects.
> These objects are used to hold information kmemleak uses, including
> a stack trace. If slub_debug is also turned on, each of them has
> *another* stack trace, so the overhead adds up, and on my tests (on
> ARCH=um, admittedly) 2/3rds of the allocations end up being doing
> the stack tracing.
> 
> Turn off SLAB_STORE_USER if SLAB_NOLEAKTRACE was given, to avoid
> storing the essentially same data twice.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>

Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>

> ---
> Perhaps instead it should go the other way around, and kmemleak
> could even use/access the stack trace that's already in there ...
> But I don't really care too much, I can just turn off slub debug
> for the kmemleak caches via the command line anyway :-)
> 

I think making the change to kmem_cache_flags() is likely the simplest.



      parent reply	other threads:[~2021-01-15 19:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-13 20:51 Johannes Berg
2021-01-14 11:07 ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-01-14 11:13 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-01-15 19:41 ` David Rientjes [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ef5c2539-735-42ef-89e0-ef142da415cd@google.com \
    --to=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=johannes.berg@intel.com \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox