From: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, hannes@cmpxchg.org, mhocko@kernel.org,
vdavydov.dev@gmail.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, pombredanne@nexb.com,
stummala@codeaurora.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
sfr@canb.auug.org.au, guro@fb.com, mka@chromium.org,
penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp, chris@chris-wilson.co.uk,
longman@redhat.com, minchan@kernel.org, hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com,
ying.huang@intel.com, mgorman@techsingularity.net,
shakeelb@google.com, jbacik@fb.com, linux@roeck-us.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] mm: Assign memcg-aware shrinkers bitmap to memcg
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 19:39:06 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ef34c7c8-0ce7-f427-6743-2cbd8d844298@virtuozzo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180321175453.GG4780@bombadil.infradead.org>
On 21.03.2018 20:54, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 07:42:38PM +0300, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
>> On 21.03.2018 19:20, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>>>> Sound great, thanks for explaining this. The big problem I see is
>>>> that IDA/IDR add primitives allocate memory, while they will be used
>>>> in the places, where they mustn't fail. There is list_lru_add(), and
>>>> it's called unconditionally in current kernel code. The patchset makes
>>>> the bitmap be populated in this function. So, we can't use IDR there.
>>>
>>> Maybe we can use GFP_NOFAIL here. They're small allocations, so we're
>>> only asking for single-page allocations to not fail, which shouldn't
>>> put too much strain on the VM.
>>
>> Oh. I'm not sure about this. Even if each allocation is small, there is
>> theoretically possible a situation, when many lists will want to add first
>> element. list_lru_add() is called from iput() for example.
>
> I see. Maybe we could solve this with an IDA_NO_SHRINK flag and an
> ida_resize(ida, max); call.
But what will be the difference to bitmap, if we allocate maximal map anyway?
> You'll also want something like this:
>
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/idr.h b/include/linux/idr.h
> index 0f650b90ced0..ee7185354fb2 100644
> --- a/include/linux/idr.h
> +++ b/include/linux/idr.h
> @@ -273,6 +273,22 @@ static inline void ida_init(struct ida *ida)
> ida_alloc_range(ida, start, (end) - 1, gfp)
> #define ida_simple_remove(ida, id) ida_free(ida, id)
>
> +int ida_find(struct ida *, unsigned int id);
> +
> +/**
> + * ida_for_each() - Iterate over all allocated IDs.
> + * @ida: IDA handle.
> + * @id: Loop cursor.
> + *
> + * For each iteration of this loop, @id will be set to an allocated ID.
> + * No locks are held across the body of the loop, so you can call ida_free()
> + * if you want or adjust @id to skip IDs or re-process earlier IDs.
> + *
> + * On successful loop exit, @id will be less than 0.
> + */
> +#define ida_for_each(ida, i) \
> + for (i = ida_find(ida, 0); i >= 0; i = ida_find(ida, i + 1))
> +
> /**
> * ida_get_new - allocate new ID
> * @ida: idr handle
> diff --git a/lib/idr.c b/lib/idr.c
> index fab3763e8c2a..ba9fae7eb2f5 100644
> --- a/lib/idr.c
> +++ b/lib/idr.c
> @@ -612,3 +612,54 @@ void ida_free(struct ida *ida, unsigned int id)
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&simple_ida_lock, flags);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(ida_free);
> +
> +/**
> + * ida_find() - Find an allocated ID.
> + * @ida: IDA handle.
> + * @id: Minimum ID to return.
> + *
> + * Context: Any context.
> + * Return: An ID which is at least as large as @id or %-ENOSPC if @id is
> + * higher than any allocated ID.
> + */
> +int ida_find(struct ida *ida, unsigned int id)
> +{
> + unsigned long flags;
> + unsigned long index = id / IDA_BITMAP_BITS;
> + unsigned bit = id % IDA_BITMAP_BITS;
> + struct ida_bitmap *bitmap;
> + struct radix_tree_iter iter;
> + void __rcu **slot;
> + int ret = -ENOSPC;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&simple_ida_lock, flags);
> +advance:
> + slot = radix_tree_iter_find(&ida->ida_rt, &iter, index);
> + if (!slot)
> + goto unlock;
> + bitmap = rcu_dereference_raw(*slot);
> + if (radix_tree_exception(bitmap)) {
> + if (bit < (BITS_PER_LONG - RADIX_TREE_EXCEPTIONAL_SHIFT)) {
> + unsigned long bits = (unsigned long)bitmap;
> +
> + bits >>= bit + RADIX_TREE_EXCEPTIONAL_SHIFT;
> + if (bits) {
> + bit += __ffs(bits);
> + goto found;
> + }
> + }
> + } else {
> + bit = find_next_bit(bitmap->bitmap, IDA_BITMAP_BITS, bit);
> + if (bit < IDA_BITMAP_BITS)
> + goto found;
> + }
> + bit = 0;
> + index++;
> + goto advance;
> +found:
> + ret = iter.index * IDA_BITMAP_BITS + bit;
> +unlock:
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&simple_ida_lock, flags);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(ida_find);
> diff --git a/tools/testing/radix-tree/idr-test.c b/tools/testing/radix-tree/idr-test.c
> index 6c645eb77d42..a9b5a33a4ef3 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/radix-tree/idr-test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/radix-tree/idr-test.c
> @@ -358,8 +358,12 @@ void ida_check_conv(void)
> assert(ida_pre_get(&ida, GFP_KERNEL));
> assert(!ida_get_new_above(&ida, i + 1, &id));
> assert(id == i + 1);
> + ida_for_each(&ida, id)
> + BUG_ON(id != (i + 1));
> assert(!ida_get_new_above(&ida, i + BITS_PER_LONG, &id));
> assert(id == i + BITS_PER_LONG);
> + ida_for_each(&ida, id)
> + BUG_ON((id != (i + 1)) && (id != (i + BITS_PER_LONG)));
> ida_remove(&ida, i + 1);
> ida_remove(&ida, i + BITS_PER_LONG);
> assert(ida_is_empty(&ida));
> @@ -484,7 +488,7 @@ void ida_simple_get_remove_test(void)
> void ida_checks(void)
> {
> DEFINE_IDA(ida);
> - int id;
> + int id, id2;
> unsigned long i;
>
> radix_tree_cpu_dead(1);
> @@ -496,8 +500,22 @@ void ida_checks(void)
> assert(id == i);
> }
>
> + id2 = 0;
> + ida_for_each(&ida, id) {
> + BUG_ON(id != id2++);
> + }
> + BUG_ON(id >= 0);
> + BUG_ON(id2 != 10000);
> +
> ida_remove(&ida, 20);
> ida_remove(&ida, 21);
> + id2 = 0;
> + ida_for_each(&ida, id) {
> + if (id != id2++) {
> + BUG_ON(id != 22 || id2 != 21);
> + id2 = 23;
> + }
> + }
> for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
> assert(ida_pre_get(&ida, GFP_KERNEL));
> assert(!ida_get_new(&ida, &id));
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-22 16:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-21 13:21 [PATCH 00/10] Improve shrink_slab() scalability (old complexity was O(n^2), new is O(n)) Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-21 13:21 ` [PATCH 01/10] mm: Assign id to every memcg-aware shrinker Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-24 18:40 ` Vladimir Davydov
2018-03-26 15:09 ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-26 15:14 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-03-26 15:38 ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-27 9:15 ` Vladimir Davydov
2018-03-27 15:09 ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-27 15:48 ` Vladimir Davydov
2018-03-28 10:30 ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-28 11:02 ` Vladimir Davydov
2018-03-21 13:21 ` [PATCH 02/10] mm: Maintain memcg-aware shrinkers in mcg_shrinkers array Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-24 18:45 ` Vladimir Davydov
2018-03-26 15:20 ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-26 15:34 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-03-27 9:18 ` Vladimir Davydov
2018-03-27 15:30 ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-21 13:21 ` [PATCH 03/10] mm: Assign memcg-aware shrinkers bitmap to memcg Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-21 14:56 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-03-21 15:12 ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-21 15:26 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-03-21 15:43 ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-21 16:20 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-03-21 16:42 ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-21 17:54 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-03-22 16:39 ` Kirill Tkhai [this message]
2018-03-23 9:06 ` kbuild test robot
2018-03-23 11:26 ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-24 19:25 ` Vladimir Davydov
2018-03-26 15:29 ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-27 10:00 ` Vladimir Davydov
2018-03-27 15:17 ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-21 13:21 ` [PATCH 04/10] fs: Propagate shrinker::id to list_lru Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-24 18:50 ` Vladimir Davydov
2018-03-26 15:29 ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-21 13:22 ` [PATCH 05/10] list_lru: Add memcg argument to list_lru_from_kmem() Kirill Tkhai
2018-04-02 3:17 ` [lkp-robot] [list_lru] 42658d54ce: BUG:unable_to_handle_kernel kernel test robot
2018-04-02 8:51 ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-21 13:22 ` [PATCH 06/10] list_lru: Pass dst_memcg argument to memcg_drain_list_lru_node() Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-24 19:32 ` Vladimir Davydov
2018-03-26 15:30 ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-28 14:49 ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-21 13:22 ` [PATCH 07/10] list_lru: Pass lru " Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-21 13:22 ` [PATCH 08/10] mm: Set bit in memcg shrinker bitmap on first list_lru item apearance Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-24 19:45 ` Vladimir Davydov
2018-03-26 15:31 ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-21 13:22 ` [PATCH 09/10] mm: Iterate only over charged shrinkers during memcg shrink_slab() Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-24 20:11 ` Vladimir Davydov
2018-03-26 15:33 ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-21 13:23 ` [PATCH 10/10] mm: Clear shrinker bit if there are no objects related to memcg Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-24 20:33 ` Vladimir Davydov
2018-03-26 15:37 ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-21 13:23 ` [PATCH 00/10] Improve shrink_slab() scalability (old complexity was O(n^2), new is O(n)) Kirill Tkhai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ef34c7c8-0ce7-f427-6743-2cbd8d844298@virtuozzo.com \
--to=ktkhai@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com \
--cc=jbacik@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=mka@chromium.org \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=pombredanne@nexb.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=stummala@codeaurora.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox