From: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
To: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@linux.dev>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
Prakash Sangappa <prakash.sangappa@oracle.com>,
James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>,
Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>,
Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>,
Ray Fucillo <Ray.Fucillo@intersystems.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 4/8] hugetlbfs: catch and handle truncate racing with page faults
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2022 17:20:12 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ee6af38d-f797-a64f-e5c4-78bad3753aca@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220706202347.95150-5-mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
On 2022/7/7 4:23, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> Most hugetlb fault handling code checks for faults beyond i_size.
> While there are early checks in the code paths, the most difficult
> to handle are those discovered after taking the page table lock.
> At this point, we have possibly allocated a page and consumed
> associated reservations and possibly added the page to the page cache.
>
> When discovering a fault beyond i_size, be sure to:
> - Remove the page from page cache, else it will sit there until the
> file is removed.
> - Do not restore any reservation for the page consumed. Otherwise
> there will be an outstanding reservation for an offset beyond the
> end of file.
>
> The 'truncation' code in remove_inode_hugepages must deal with fault
> code potentially removing a page/folio from the cache after the page was
> returned by filemap_get_folios and before locking the page. This can be
> discovered by a change in folio_mapping() after taking folio lock. In
> addition, this code must deal with fault code potentially consuming
> and returning reservations. To synchronize this, remove_inode_hugepages
> will now take the fault mutex for ALL indices in the hole or truncated
> range. In this way, it KNOWS fault code has finished with the page/index
> OR fault code will see the updated file size.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
> ---
<snip>
> @@ -5606,8 +5610,10 @@ static vm_fault_t hugetlb_no_page(struct mm_struct *mm,
>
> ptl = huge_pte_lock(h, mm, ptep);
> size = i_size_read(mapping->host) >> huge_page_shift(h);
> - if (idx >= size)
> + if (idx >= size) {
> + beyond_i_size = true;
Thanks for your patch. There is one question:
Since races between hugetlb pagefault and truncate is guarded by hugetlb_fault_mutex,
do we really need to check it again after taking the page table lock?
BTW: I will learn more about this series when I have enough time. Thanks for your work. :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-27 9:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-06 20:23 [RFC PATCH v4 0/8] hugetlb: Change huge pmd sharing synchronization again Mike Kravetz
2022-07-06 20:23 ` [RFC PATCH v4 1/8] hugetlbfs: revert use i_mmap_rwsem to address page fault/truncate race Mike Kravetz
2022-07-06 20:23 ` [RFC PATCH v4 2/8] hugetlbfs: revert use i_mmap_rwsem for more pmd sharing synchronization Mike Kravetz
2022-07-06 20:23 ` [RFC PATCH v4 3/8] hugetlbfs: move routine remove_huge_page to hugetlb.c Mike Kravetz
2022-08-05 16:11 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-07-06 20:23 ` [RFC PATCH v4 4/8] hugetlbfs: catch and handle truncate racing with page faults Mike Kravetz
2022-07-27 9:20 ` Miaohe Lin [this message]
2022-07-27 19:00 ` Mike Kravetz
2022-07-28 2:02 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-07-28 16:45 ` Mike Kravetz
2022-08-05 16:28 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-08-05 22:41 ` Mike Kravetz
2022-07-06 20:23 ` [RFC PATCH v4 5/8] hugetlb: rename vma_shareable() and refactor code Mike Kravetz
2022-07-06 20:23 ` [RFC PATCH v4 6/8] hugetlb: add vma based lock for pmd sharing synchronization Mike Kravetz
2022-07-29 2:55 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-07-29 18:00 ` Mike Kravetz
2022-07-30 2:12 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-07-06 20:23 ` [RFC PATCH v4 7/8] hugetlb: create hugetlb_unmap_file_folio to unmap single file folio Mike Kravetz
2022-07-29 2:02 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-07-29 18:11 ` Mike Kravetz
2022-07-30 2:15 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-07-06 20:23 ` [RFC PATCH v4 8/8] hugetlb: use new vma_lock for pmd sharing synchronization Mike Kravetz
2022-07-28 6:51 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-07-28 17:47 ` Mike Kravetz
2022-07-29 1:41 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-07-29 17:41 ` Mike Kravetz
2022-07-30 1:57 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-07-20 14:16 ` [RFC PATCH v4 0/8] hugetlb: Change huge pmd sharing synchronization again Ray Fucillo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ee6af38d-f797-a64f-e5c4-78bad3753aca@huawei.com \
--to=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=Ray.Fucillo@intersystems.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=almasrymina@google.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=jthoughton@google.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=naoya.horiguchi@linux.dev \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=prakash.sangappa@oracle.com \
--cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox