* [PATCH v1] mm: drop NULL return check of pte_offset_map_lock()
@ 2017-05-18 6:42 Naoya Horiguchi
2017-05-19 13:15 ` Vlastimil Babka
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Naoya Horiguchi @ 2017-05-18 6:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mm
Cc: Mel Gorman, Johannes Weiner, Andrea Arcangeli, Rik van Riel,
Andrew Morton, linux-kernel, Naoya Horiguchi
pte_offset_map_lock() finds and takes ptl, and returns pte.
But some callers return without unlocking the ptl when pte == NULL,
which seems weird.
Git history said that !pte check in change_pte_range() was introduced in
commit 1ad9f620c3a2 ("mm: numa: recheck for transhuge pages under lock
during protection changes") and still remains after commit 175ad4f1e7a2
("mm: mprotect: use pmd_trans_unstable instead of taking the pmd_lock")
which partially reverts 1ad9f620c3a2. So I think that it's just dead code.
Many other caller of pte_offset_map_lock() never check NULL return, so
let's do likewise.
Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
---
mm/memory.c | 2 --
mm/mprotect.c | 2 --
2 files changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git v4.11-rc6-mmotm-2017-04-13-14-50/mm/memory.c v4.11-rc6-mmotm-2017-04-13-14-50_patched/mm/memory.c
index 8ae6700..c17fad1d 100644
--- v4.11-rc6-mmotm-2017-04-13-14-50/mm/memory.c
+++ v4.11-rc6-mmotm-2017-04-13-14-50_patched/mm/memory.c
@@ -4040,8 +4040,6 @@ static int __follow_pte_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
goto out;
ptep = pte_offset_map_lock(mm, pmd, address, ptlp);
- if (!ptep)
- goto out;
if (!pte_present(*ptep))
goto unlock;
*ptepp = ptep;
diff --git v4.11-rc6-mmotm-2017-04-13-14-50/mm/mprotect.c v4.11-rc6-mmotm-2017-04-13-14-50_patched/mm/mprotect.c
index 8fd010f..d60a1ee 100644
--- v4.11-rc6-mmotm-2017-04-13-14-50/mm/mprotect.c
+++ v4.11-rc6-mmotm-2017-04-13-14-50_patched/mm/mprotect.c
@@ -58,8 +58,6 @@ static unsigned long change_pte_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
* reading.
*/
pte = pte_offset_map_lock(vma->vm_mm, pmd, addr, &ptl);
- if (!pte)
- return 0;
/* Get target node for single threaded private VMAs */
if (prot_numa && !(vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED) &&
--
2.7.0
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v1] mm: drop NULL return check of pte_offset_map_lock()
2017-05-18 6:42 [PATCH v1] mm: drop NULL return check of pte_offset_map_lock() Naoya Horiguchi
@ 2017-05-19 13:15 ` Vlastimil Babka
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Vlastimil Babka @ 2017-05-19 13:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Naoya Horiguchi, linux-mm
Cc: Mel Gorman, Johannes Weiner, Andrea Arcangeli, Rik van Riel,
Andrew Morton, linux-kernel
On 05/18/2017 08:42 AM, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> pte_offset_map_lock() finds and takes ptl, and returns pte.
> But some callers return without unlocking the ptl when pte == NULL,
> which seems weird.
>
> Git history said that !pte check in change_pte_range() was introduced in
> commit 1ad9f620c3a2 ("mm: numa: recheck for transhuge pages under lock
> during protection changes") and still remains after commit 175ad4f1e7a2
> ("mm: mprotect: use pmd_trans_unstable instead of taking the pmd_lock")
> which partially reverts 1ad9f620c3a2. So I think that it's just dead code.
>
> Many other caller of pte_offset_map_lock() never check NULL return, so
> let's do likewise.
>
> Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
> ---
> mm/memory.c | 2 --
> mm/mprotect.c | 2 --
> 2 files changed, 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git v4.11-rc6-mmotm-2017-04-13-14-50/mm/memory.c v4.11-rc6-mmotm-2017-04-13-14-50_patched/mm/memory.c
> index 8ae6700..c17fad1d 100644
> --- v4.11-rc6-mmotm-2017-04-13-14-50/mm/memory.c
> +++ v4.11-rc6-mmotm-2017-04-13-14-50_patched/mm/memory.c
> @@ -4040,8 +4040,6 @@ static int __follow_pte_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
> goto out;
>
> ptep = pte_offset_map_lock(mm, pmd, address, ptlp);
> - if (!ptep)
> - goto out;
> if (!pte_present(*ptep))
> goto unlock;
> *ptepp = ptep;
> diff --git v4.11-rc6-mmotm-2017-04-13-14-50/mm/mprotect.c v4.11-rc6-mmotm-2017-04-13-14-50_patched/mm/mprotect.c
> index 8fd010f..d60a1ee 100644
> --- v4.11-rc6-mmotm-2017-04-13-14-50/mm/mprotect.c
> +++ v4.11-rc6-mmotm-2017-04-13-14-50_patched/mm/mprotect.c
> @@ -58,8 +58,6 @@ static unsigned long change_pte_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
> * reading.
> */
> pte = pte_offset_map_lock(vma->vm_mm, pmd, addr, &ptl);
> - if (!pte)
> - return 0;
>
> /* Get target node for single threaded private VMAs */
> if (prot_numa && !(vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED) &&
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-05-19 13:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-05-18 6:42 [PATCH v1] mm: drop NULL return check of pte_offset_map_lock() Naoya Horiguchi
2017-05-19 13:15 ` Vlastimil Babka
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox