linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
To: Jia He <hejianet@gmail.com>, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Kemi Wang <kemi.wang@intel.com>,
	Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Eugeniu Rosca <erosca@de.adit-jv.com>,
	Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@suse.com>,
	Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com>,
	"AKASHI Takahiro" <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	"Andrey Ryabinin" <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
	Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>,
	"Daniel Vacek" <neelx@redhat.com>,
	Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>,
	"Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	YASUAKI ISHIMATSU <yasu.isimatu@gmail.com>,
	"Jia He" <jia.he@hxt-semitech.com>,
	Gioh Kim <gi-oh.kim@profitbricks.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Steve Capper <steve.capper@arm.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	"Philip Derrin" <philip@cog.systems>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 0/3] remain and optimize memblock_next_valid_pfn on arm and arm64
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 20:48:57 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ed84966f-81ed-3be9-5b21-1fd92deea3cc@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8fdf5545-21b7-354c-4c4b-e1e92048864f@gmail.com>

On 2019/6/12 9:05, Jia He wrote:
>>
>>> So what I would like to see is the patch set being proposed again,
>>> with the new data points added for documentation. Also, the commit
>>> logs need to crystal clear about how the meaning of PFN validity
>>> differs between ARM and other architectures, and why the assumptions
>>> that the optimization is based on are guaranteed to hold.
>> I think Jia He no longer works for HXT, if don't mind, I can repost
>> this patch set with Jia He's authority unchanged.
> Ok, I don't mind that, thanks for your followup :)

That's great, I will prepare a new version with Ard's comments addressed
then repost.

Thanks
Hanjun


      reply	other threads:[~2019-06-12 12:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-22  3:07 Jia He
2018-08-22  3:07 ` [PATCH v11 1/3] arm: arm64: introduce CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_PFN_VALID Jia He
2018-08-22  3:07 ` [PATCH v11 2/3] mm: page_alloc: remain memblock_next_valid_pfn() on arm/arm64 Jia He
2018-08-22  3:07 ` [PATCH v11 3/3] mm: page_alloc: reduce unnecessary binary search in memblock_next_valid_pfn Jia He
2018-09-05 21:57 ` [PATCH v11 0/3] remain and optimize memblock_next_valid_pfn on arm and arm64 Andrew Morton
2018-09-06 10:47   ` Will Deacon
2018-09-06 11:24 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-09-07 14:44   ` Will Deacon
2018-09-14 18:50     ` Eugeniu Rosca
2019-06-08  4:22     ` Hanjun Guo
2019-06-10 13:16       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-06-11 15:18         ` Hanjun Guo
2019-06-12  1:05           ` Jia He
2019-06-12 12:48             ` Hanjun Guo [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ed84966f-81ed-3be9-5b21-1fd92deea3cc@huawei.com \
    --to=guohanjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@arm.com \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com \
    --cc=erosca@de.adit-jv.com \
    --cc=gi-oh.kim@profitbricks.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hejianet@gmail.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=jia.he@hxt-semitech.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kemi.wang@intel.com \
    --cc=labbott@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=nborisov@suse.com \
    --cc=neelx@redhat.com \
    --cc=philip@cog.systems \
    --cc=ptesarik@suse.com \
    --cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
    --cc=steve.capper@arm.com \
    --cc=takahiro.akashi@linaro.org \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=vladimir.murzin@arm.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=yasu.isimatu@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox