From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Sumanth Korikkar <sumanthk@linux.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] s390/sclp: Add support for dynamic (de)configuration of memory
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2025 21:13:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ed7db8b9-e828-420d-a8b2-3e1b8aa8c95c@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251009131839.3739108-3-sumanthk@linux.ibm.com>
Just a couple of nits
> ---
> drivers/s390/char/sclp_mem.c | 290 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 207 insertions(+), 83 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/char/sclp_mem.c b/drivers/s390/char/sclp_mem.c
> index 27f49f5fd358..e1302b1c98ac 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/char/sclp_mem.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/char/sclp_mem.c
> @@ -9,9 +9,12 @@
> #define pr_fmt(fmt) KMSG_COMPONENT ": " fmt
>
> #include <linux/cpufeature.h>
> +#include <linux/container_of.h>
> #include <linux/err.h>
> #include <linux/errno.h>
> #include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/kobject.h>
> +#include <linux/kstrtox.h>
> #include <linux/memory.h>
> #include <linux/memory_hotplug.h>
> #include <linux/mm.h>
> @@ -27,7 +30,6 @@
> #define SCLP_CMDW_ASSIGN_STORAGE 0x000d0001
> #define SCLP_CMDW_UNASSIGN_STORAGE 0x000c0001
>
> -static DEFINE_MUTEX(sclp_mem_mutex);
> static LIST_HEAD(sclp_mem_list);
> static u8 sclp_max_storage_id;
> static DECLARE_BITMAP(sclp_storage_ids, 256);
> @@ -38,6 +40,18 @@ struct memory_increment {
> int standby;
> };
>
> +struct sclp_mem {
> + struct kobject kobj;
> + unsigned int id;
> + unsigned int memmap_on_memory;
> + unsigned int config;
> +};
> +
> +struct sclp_mem_arg {
> + struct sclp_mem *sclp_mems;
> + struct kset *kset;
> +};
Just one thought: if you keep either as global variable you wouldn't
need this. (I would just keep both as globals, but whatever you prefer)
Whatever you prefer.
[...]
>
> -static void __init sclp_add_standby_memory(void)
> +static int __init create_standby_sclp_mems(struct sclp_mem *sclp_mems, struct kset *kset)
> {
> struct memory_increment *incr;
> + int rc = 0;
>
> list_for_each_entry(incr, &sclp_mem_list, list) {
> if (incr->standby)
> - add_memory_merged(incr->rn);
> + rc = create_standby_sclp_mems_merged(sclp_mems, kset, incr->rn);
> + if (rc)
> + goto out;
Why not "return rc;" to avoid the goto label?
> }
> - add_memory_merged(0);
> + rc = create_standby_sclp_mems_merged(sclp_mems, kset, 0);
> +out:
> + return rc;
> +}
> +
> +static int __init init_sclp_mem(void)
> +{
> + const u64 block_size = memory_block_size_bytes();
Instead of "u64" maybe "unsigned long" like memory_block_size_bytes()
returns?
> + const u64 max_sclp_mems = roundup(sclp.rnmax * sclp.rzm, block_size) / block_size;
Instead of u64 maybe "unsigned int" like the ids you store per sclp_mem?
> + struct sclp_mem *sclp_mems;
> + struct sclp_mem_arg arg;
> + struct kset *kset;
> + int rc;
> +
> + /* Allocate memory for all blocks ahead of time. */
> + sclp_mems = kcalloc(max_sclp_mems, sizeof(struct sclp_mem), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!sclp_mems)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + kset = kset_create_and_add("memory", NULL, firmware_kobj);
> + if (!kset)
> + return -ENOMEM;
I guess we don't care about freeing sclp_mems in that case? Likely it
should never ever happen either way.
--
Cheers
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-09 19:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-09 13:18 [PATCH v2 0/4] Support " Sumanth Korikkar
2025-10-09 13:18 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] s390/mm: Support removal of boot-allocated virtual memory map Sumanth Korikkar
2025-10-09 13:18 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] s390/sclp: Add support for dynamic (de)configuration of memory Sumanth Korikkar
2025-10-09 19:13 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2025-10-10 8:09 ` Sumanth Korikkar
2025-10-10 8:16 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-09 13:18 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] s390/sclp: Remove MHP_OFFLINE_INACCESSIBLE Sumanth Korikkar
2025-10-09 13:18 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] mm/memory_hotplug: Remove MEM_PREPARE_ONLINE/MEM_FINISH_OFFLINE notifiers Sumanth Korikkar
2025-10-09 19:03 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-10 8:24 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] Support dynamic (de)configuration of memory Heiko Carstens
2025-10-10 9:02 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ed7db8b9-e828-420d-a8b2-3e1b8aa8c95c@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sumanthk@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox