From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
"Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>, Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Xu Xin <xu.xin16@zte.com.cn>,
Chengming Zhou <chengming.zhou@linux.dev>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Stefan Roesch <shr@devkernel.io>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] mm: prevent KSM from breaking VMA merging for new VMAs
Date: Fri, 30 May 2025 09:15:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ecc2b2c4-418f-44c1-b860-eb836cc5841d@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3ba660af716d87a18ca5b4e635f2101edeb56340.1748537921.git.lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
On 5/29/25 19:15, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> If a user wishes to enable KSM mergeability for an entire process and all
> fork/exec'd processes that come after it, they use the prctl()
> PR_SET_MEMORY_MERGE operation.
>
> This defaults all newly mapped VMAs to have the VM_MERGEABLE VMA flag set
> (in order to indicate they are KSM mergeable), as well as setting this flag
> for all existing VMAs and propagating this across fork/exec.
>
> However it also breaks VMA merging for new VMAs, both in the process and
> all forked (and fork/exec'd) child processes.
>
> This is because when a new mapping is proposed, the flags specified will
> never have VM_MERGEABLE set. However all adjacent VMAs will already have
> VM_MERGEABLE set, rendering VMAs unmergeable by default.
>
> To work around this, we try to set the VM_MERGEABLE flag prior to
> attempting a merge. In the case of brk() this can always be done.
>
> However on mmap() things are more complicated - while KSM is not supported
> for MAP_SHARED file-backed mappings, it is supported for MAP_PRIVATE
> file-backed mappings.
>
> These mappings may have deprecated .mmap() callbacks specified which could,
> in theory, adjust flags and thus KSM eligibility.
>
> So we check to determine whether this is possible. If not, we set
> VM_MERGEABLE prior to the merge attempt on mmap(), otherwise we retain the
> previous behaviour.
>
> This fixes VMA merging for all new anonymous mappings, which covers the
> majority of real-world cases, so we should see a significant improvement in
> VMA mergeability.
>
> For MAP_PRIVATE file-backed mappings, those which implement the
> .mmap_prepare() hook and shmem are both known to be safe, so we allow
> these, disallowing all other cases.
>
> Also add stubs for newly introduced function invocations to VMA userland
> testing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
> Fixes: d7597f59d1d3 ("mm: add new api to enable ksm per process") # please no backport!
> Reviewed-by: Chengming Zhou <chengming.zhou@linux.dev>
> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>
The commit log is much clearer to me now, thanks :)
Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-30 7:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-29 17:15 [PATCH v3 0/4] mm: ksm: prevent KSM from breaking merging of " Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-05-29 17:15 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] mm: ksm: have KSM VMA checks not require a VMA pointer Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-05-29 17:15 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] mm: ksm: refer to special VMAs via VM_SPECIAL in ksm_compatible() Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-05-29 17:15 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] mm: prevent KSM from breaking VMA merging for new VMAs Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-05-30 7:15 ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2025-06-02 7:00 ` xu.xin16
2025-06-20 12:48 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-22 19:39 ` Andrew Morton
2025-06-23 9:16 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-23 8:37 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-06-23 9:18 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-05-29 17:15 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] tools/testing/selftests: add VMA merge tests for KSM merge Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-05-30 7:17 ` Vlastimil Babka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ecc2b2c4-418f-44c1-b860-eb836cc5841d@suse.cz \
--to=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=pfalcato@suse.de \
--cc=shr@devkernel.io \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=xu.xin16@zte.com.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox