From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDF8BE77188 for ; Wed, 8 Jan 2025 11:52:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 1D2F66B0088; Wed, 8 Jan 2025 06:52:56 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 15B686B0089; Wed, 8 Jan 2025 06:52:56 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id EF07C6B008A; Wed, 8 Jan 2025 06:52:55 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0010.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.10]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEB9C6B0088 for ; Wed, 8 Jan 2025 06:52:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin09.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay10.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 735EEC1099 for ; Wed, 8 Jan 2025 11:52:55 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 82984123110.09.904D236 Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [195.135.223.131]) by imf22.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1E89C0006 for ; Wed, 8 Jan 2025 11:52:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf22.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b="Ptg8/Mcd"; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=pt12ht0K; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=xK9F51Dq; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=KGxjW8Ut; spf=pass (imf22.hostedemail.com: domain of vbabka@suse.cz designates 195.135.223.131 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=vbabka@suse.cz; dmarc=none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1736337173; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=TvEtdaxaJySSjoiJaPPRkpXjE4vtepMmsLxZ6ErrqXk=; b=CtLUX/qOg8hswd6MEO9KbcghU3tJlLm7jadMPlKG7mYCE1hLXyF2n1ImsQw+qOrJb1/m78 fBExVpIwaGo8afRq39AfwcU8ITB0BQ8FNJ0A1oeX1syDGua+odjwiWjmXhdmWzqcTI4M79 j+CAbcf0Qd1we8OulGTu7AF4XzXo838= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf22.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b="Ptg8/Mcd"; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=pt12ht0K; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=xK9F51Dq; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=KGxjW8Ut; spf=pass (imf22.hostedemail.com: domain of vbabka@suse.cz designates 195.135.223.131 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=vbabka@suse.cz; dmarc=none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1736337173; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=Q7vvu1BankuNrJtQNjMRebxw2KLiTKL9l85Itl68a8rIbyQivuLOME4UVruePen14RP2v7 UCE56dfh3nHJC8enkuaDHdQ0UYPfTcibjzx0vHtK4EznPAyuX/RAMbyvRujPz9d/Ax0YWP irC7uHmgGhfC9hdusd/sB1Moj9DPm9M= Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (unknown [10.150.64.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBDA71F385; Wed, 8 Jan 2025 11:52:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1736337171; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:autocrypt:autocrypt; bh=TvEtdaxaJySSjoiJaPPRkpXjE4vtepMmsLxZ6ErrqXk=; b=Ptg8/McdN2feG8uPWgV8k5k5stL8TZ+tcPGtN8pVpOVQ1ItQGkPKp2FfNvCFnz/pMapkg1 wsgtjveVKN2o8imjNpgJH8NxPR03ZzQMhuc1RO40I4+9xK9d+pA6wg26GRx9oBrXOIX3VN ffZAFkd3TkFLxCO6TE0/gslbnSr0zBE= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1736337171; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:autocrypt:autocrypt; bh=TvEtdaxaJySSjoiJaPPRkpXjE4vtepMmsLxZ6ErrqXk=; b=pt12ht0KASdEmIuY1SPsolrXZCczFjeLjkaCohQgjnZVXx5AcHlraO2qySPHnmZfPhwX2Q nRRnc990a0mWkxCw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1736337170; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:autocrypt:autocrypt; bh=TvEtdaxaJySSjoiJaPPRkpXjE4vtepMmsLxZ6ErrqXk=; b=xK9F51DqYQKrIh9cy08N+CmATZCNSy/IjWRgXJX5M24wSSS/uxxcIW0tYtctS1Rq+1qsc8 4kPcvHmL8VZPNmF8SKiGlWPFGpuWRIjD4mUjBu/TtrLUIE7aybrGSISd5T/DCvpJzbFQFI ntiPBkgRJmt1UZxM0HLq8g6F9QQCAmU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1736337170; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:autocrypt:autocrypt; bh=TvEtdaxaJySSjoiJaPPRkpXjE4vtepMmsLxZ6ErrqXk=; b=KGxjW8UtPnrM1/jZL8tkzrtgauhbdGv9mmpNE570OpdqcmMp7oDtLN/6O6klQmiTIktGAb ezNXVwvSMB3d/NAg== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB5CE1351A; Wed, 8 Jan 2025 11:52:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id 3RiFKRJnfmebFQAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Wed, 08 Jan 2025 11:52:50 +0000 Message-ID: Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2025 12:52:50 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 12/17] mm: replace vm_lock and detached flag with a reference count Content-Language: en-US To: Suren Baghdasaryan , akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: peterz@infradead.org, willy@infradead.org, liam.howlett@oracle.com, lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, mhocko@suse.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, mjguzik@gmail.com, oliver.sang@intel.com, mgorman@techsingularity.net, david@redhat.com, peterx@redhat.com, oleg@redhat.com, dave@stgolabs.net, paulmck@kernel.org, brauner@kernel.org, dhowells@redhat.com, hdanton@sina.com, hughd@google.com, lokeshgidra@google.com, minchan@google.com, jannh@google.com, shakeel.butt@linux.dev, souravpanda@google.com, pasha.tatashin@soleen.com, klarasmodin@gmail.com, corbet@lwn.net, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com References: <20241226170710.1159679-1-surenb@google.com> <20241226170710.1159679-13-surenb@google.com> From: Vlastimil Babka Autocrypt: addr=vbabka@suse.cz; keydata= xsFNBFZdmxYBEADsw/SiUSjB0dM+vSh95UkgcHjzEVBlby/Fg+g42O7LAEkCYXi/vvq31JTB KxRWDHX0R2tgpFDXHnzZcQywawu8eSq0LxzxFNYMvtB7sV1pxYwej2qx9B75qW2plBs+7+YB 87tMFA+u+L4Z5xAzIimfLD5EKC56kJ1CsXlM8S/LHcmdD9Ctkn3trYDNnat0eoAcfPIP2OZ+ 9oe9IF/R28zmh0ifLXyJQQz5ofdj4bPf8ecEW0rhcqHfTD8k4yK0xxt3xW+6Exqp9n9bydiy tcSAw/TahjW6yrA+6JhSBv1v2tIm+itQc073zjSX8OFL51qQVzRFr7H2UQG33lw2QrvHRXqD Ot7ViKam7v0Ho9wEWiQOOZlHItOOXFphWb2yq3nzrKe45oWoSgkxKb97MVsQ+q2SYjJRBBH4 8qKhphADYxkIP6yut/eaj9ImvRUZZRi0DTc8xfnvHGTjKbJzC2xpFcY0DQbZzuwsIZ8OPJCc LM4S7mT25NE5kUTG/TKQCk922vRdGVMoLA7dIQrgXnRXtyT61sg8PG4wcfOnuWf8577aXP1x 6mzw3/jh3F+oSBHb/GcLC7mvWreJifUL2gEdssGfXhGWBo6zLS3qhgtwjay0Jl+kza1lo+Cv BB2T79D4WGdDuVa4eOrQ02TxqGN7G0Biz5ZLRSFzQSQwLn8fbwARAQABzSBWbGFzdGltaWwg QmFia2EgPHZiYWJrYUBzdXNlLmN6PsLBlAQTAQoAPgIbAwULCQgHAwUVCgkICwUWAgMBAAIe AQIXgBYhBKlA1DSZLC6OmRA9UCJPp+fMgqZkBQJkBREIBQkRadznAAoJECJPp+fMgqZkNxIQ ALZRqwdUGzqL2aeSavbum/VF/+td+nZfuH0xeWiO2w8mG0+nPd5j9ujYeHcUP1edE7uQrjOC Gs9sm8+W1xYnbClMJTsXiAV88D2btFUdU1mCXURAL9wWZ8Jsmz5ZH2V6AUszvNezsS/VIT87 AmTtj31TLDGwdxaZTSYLwAOOOtyqafOEq+gJB30RxTRE3h3G1zpO7OM9K6ysLdAlwAGYWgJJ V4JqGsQ/lyEtxxFpUCjb5Pztp7cQxhlkil0oBYHkudiG8j1U3DG8iC6rnB4yJaLphKx57NuQ PIY0Bccg+r9gIQ4XeSK2PQhdXdy3UWBr913ZQ9AI2usid3s5vabo4iBvpJNFLgUmxFnr73SJ KsRh/2OBsg1XXF/wRQGBO9vRuJUAbnaIVcmGOUogdBVS9Sun/Sy4GNA++KtFZK95U7J417/J Hub2xV6Ehc7UGW6fIvIQmzJ3zaTEfuriU1P8ayfddrAgZb25JnOW7L1zdYL8rXiezOyYZ8Fm ZyXjzWdO0RpxcUEp6GsJr11Bc4F3aae9OZtwtLL/jxc7y6pUugB00PodgnQ6CMcfR/HjXlae h2VS3zl9+tQWHu6s1R58t5BuMS2FNA58wU/IazImc/ZQA+slDBfhRDGYlExjg19UXWe/gMcl De3P1kxYPgZdGE2eZpRLIbt+rYnqQKy8UxlszsBNBFsZNTUBCACfQfpSsWJZyi+SHoRdVyX5 J6rI7okc4+b571a7RXD5UhS9dlVRVVAtrU9ANSLqPTQKGVxHrqD39XSw8hxK61pw8p90pg4G /N3iuWEvyt+t0SxDDkClnGsDyRhlUyEWYFEoBrrCizbmahOUwqkJbNMfzj5Y7n7OIJOxNRkB IBOjPdF26dMP69BwePQao1M8Acrrex9sAHYjQGyVmReRjVEtv9iG4DoTsnIR3amKVk6si4Ea X/mrapJqSCcBUVYUFH8M7bsm4CSxier5ofy8jTEa/CfvkqpKThTMCQPNZKY7hke5qEq1CBk2 wxhX48ZrJEFf1v3NuV3OimgsF2odzieNABEBAAHCwXwEGAEKACYCGwwWIQSpQNQ0mSwujpkQ PVAiT6fnzIKmZAUCZAUSmwUJDK5EZgAKCRAiT6fnzIKmZOJGEACOKABgo9wJXsbWhGWYO7mD 8R8mUyJHqbvaz+yTLnvRwfe/VwafFfDMx5GYVYzMY9TWpA8psFTKTUIIQmx2scYsRBUwm5VI EurRWKqENcDRjyo+ol59j0FViYysjQQeobXBDDE31t5SBg++veI6tXfpco/UiKEsDswL1WAr tEAZaruo7254TyH+gydURl2wJuzo/aZ7Y7PpqaODbYv727Dvm5eX64HCyyAH0s6sOCyGF5/p eIhrOn24oBf67KtdAN3H9JoFNUVTYJc1VJU3R1JtVdgwEdr+NEciEfYl0O19VpLE/PZxP4wX PWnhf5WjdoNI1Xec+RcJ5p/pSel0jnvBX8L2cmniYnmI883NhtGZsEWj++wyKiS4NranDFlA HdDM3b4lUth1pTtABKQ1YuTvehj7EfoWD3bv9kuGZGPrAeFNiHPdOT7DaXKeHpW9homgtBxj 8aX/UkSvEGJKUEbFL9cVa5tzyialGkSiZJNkWgeHe+jEcfRT6pJZOJidSCdzvJpbdJmm+eED w9XOLH1IIWh7RURU7G1iOfEfmImFeC3cbbS73LQEFGe1urxvIH5K/7vX+FkNcr9ujwWuPE9b 1C2o4i/yZPLXIVy387EjA6GZMqvQUFuSTs/GeBcv0NjIQi8867H3uLjz+mQy63fAitsDwLmR EP+ylKVEKb0Q2A== In-Reply-To: <20241226170710.1159679-13-surenb@google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: F1E89C0006 X-Rspamd-Server: rspam12 X-Stat-Signature: r4tcbyga6wi8dyza1recejsxam34erab X-Rspam-User: X-HE-Tag: 1736337172-522080 X-HE-Meta: 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 PICq6DRI jLaCAVMUKLGADb4+0RI2ZMqnWI+U1FzSdtYmtR8xqOOjk8HQgGypYokl7EkTH8WmbAdyjCMl9Ot+B+RVW58AUy0MN+hcmmhVOWkAhAfmnd/vv8zJPDAeO9ohtjCDao9ORvsheK/V7rxu4+ilC6BVy8kd0SKnd3klJ0ydcSMfkFF7rxM3ZsDXGrrFWoWYHqgxULf/fEHZD/M88sYF/MetW6QcLXM7uNsMqOzHp9yZ0L4nfoBXijR+XiWcz9N75IibKvmKw/hgqji9WS2JHxEXmsc2X07hs21uejegRvE3CBGB5FcCTyi9eX1lWomn6hgypg+XsVDJCSO1LYkkaj53y/rmhWv6n8Rg5qPWhc3UjeUeOjVLi88px+/mkT8vdckMnWzkdo+RfuZbZB211T0XpZUwe27BRIigzh+LW8sSK8AuuCU0= X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On 12/26/24 18:07, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote: > rw_semaphore is a sizable structure of 40 bytes and consumes > considerable space for each vm_area_struct. However vma_lock has > two important specifics which can be used to replace rw_semaphore > with a simpler structure: > 1. Readers never wait. They try to take the vma_lock and fall back to > mmap_lock if that fails. > 2. Only one writer at a time will ever try to write-lock a vma_lock > because writers first take mmap_lock in write mode. > Because of these requirements, full rw_semaphore functionality is not > needed and we can replace rw_semaphore and the vma->detached flag with > a refcount (vm_refcnt). > When vma is in detached state, vm_refcnt is 0 and only a call to > vma_mark_attached() can take it out of this state. Note that unlike > before, now we enforce both vma_mark_attached() and vma_mark_detached() > to be done only after vma has been write-locked. vma_mark_attached() > changes vm_refcnt to 1 to indicate that it has been attached to the vma > tree. When a reader takes read lock, it increments vm_refcnt, unless the > top usable bit of vm_refcnt (0x40000000) is set, indicating presence of > a writer. When writer takes write lock, it both increments vm_refcnt and > sets the top usable bit to indicate its presence. If there are readers, > writer will wait using newly introduced mm->vma_writer_wait. Since all > writers take mmap_lock in write mode first, there can be only one writer > at a time. The last reader to release the lock will signal the writer > to wake up. > refcount might overflow if there are many competing readers, in which case > read-locking will fail. Readers are expected to handle such failures. > > Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra > Suggested-by: Matthew Wilcox > Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan > */ > static inline bool vma_start_read(struct vm_area_struct *vma) > { > + int oldcnt; > + > /* > * Check before locking. A race might cause false locked result. > * We can use READ_ONCE() for the mm_lock_seq here, and don't need > @@ -720,13 +745,20 @@ static inline bool vma_start_read(struct vm_area_struct *vma) > if (READ_ONCE(vma->vm_lock_seq) == READ_ONCE(vma->vm_mm->mm_lock_seq.sequence)) > return false; > > - if (unlikely(down_read_trylock(&vma->vm_lock.lock) == 0)) > + > + rwsem_acquire_read(&vma->vmlock_dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_); I don't know much about lockdep, but I see that down_read() does rwsem_acquire_read(&sem->dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_); down_read_trylock() does rwsem_acquire_read(&sem->dep_map, 0, 1, _RET_IP_); This is passing the down_read()-like variant but it behaves like a trylock, no? > + /* Limit at VMA_REF_LIMIT to leave one count for a writer */ It's mainly to not increase as much as VMA_LOCK_OFFSET bit could become false positively set set by readers, right? The "leave one count" sounds like an implementation detail of VMA_REF_LIMIT and will change if Liam's suggestion is proven feasible? > + if (unlikely(!__refcount_inc_not_zero_limited(&vma->vm_refcnt, &oldcnt, > + VMA_REF_LIMIT))) { > + rwsem_release(&vma->vmlock_dep_map, _RET_IP_); > return false; > + } > + lock_acquired(&vma->vmlock_dep_map, _RET_IP_); > > /* > - * Overflow might produce false locked result. > + * Overflow of vm_lock_seq/mm_lock_seq might produce false locked result. > * False unlocked result is impossible because we modify and check > - * vma->vm_lock_seq under vma->vm_lock protection and mm->mm_lock_seq > + * vma->vm_lock_seq under vma->vm_refcnt protection and mm->mm_lock_seq > * modification invalidates all existing locks. > * > * We must use ACQUIRE semantics for the mm_lock_seq so that if we are > @@ -734,10 +766,12 @@ static inline bool vma_start_read(struct vm_area_struct *vma) > * after it has been unlocked. > * This pairs with RELEASE semantics in vma_end_write_all(). > */ > - if (unlikely(vma->vm_lock_seq == raw_read_seqcount(&vma->vm_mm->mm_lock_seq))) { > - up_read(&vma->vm_lock.lock); > + if (unlikely(oldcnt & VMA_LOCK_OFFSET || > + vma->vm_lock_seq == raw_read_seqcount(&vma->vm_mm->mm_lock_seq))) { > + vma_refcount_put(vma); > return false; > } > + > return true; > } > > @@ -749,8 +783,17 @@ static inline bool vma_start_read(struct vm_area_struct *vma) > */ > static inline bool vma_start_read_locked_nested(struct vm_area_struct *vma, int subclass) > { > + int oldcnt; > + > mmap_assert_locked(vma->vm_mm); > - down_read_nested(&vma->vm_lock.lock, subclass); > + rwsem_acquire_read(&vma->vmlock_dep_map, subclass, 0, _RET_IP_); Same as above? > + /* Limit at VMA_REF_LIMIT to leave one count for a writer */ Also > + if (unlikely(!__refcount_inc_not_zero_limited(&vma->vm_refcnt, &oldcnt, > + VMA_REF_LIMIT))) { > + rwsem_release(&vma->vmlock_dep_map, _RET_IP_); > + return false; > + } > + lock_acquired(&vma->vmlock_dep_map, _RET_IP_); > return true; > } >