From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CAA6C021B2 for ; Thu, 20 Feb 2025 22:53:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id DB14E6B007B; Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:53:50 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id D61346B0083; Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:53:50 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id C50476B0082; Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:53:50 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0017.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.17]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5E706B00BB for ; Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:53:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin03.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41ED7122F74 for ; Thu, 20 Feb 2025 22:53:50 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 83141827020.03.6B57A98 Received: from out-188.mta0.migadu.com (out-188.mta0.migadu.com [91.218.175.188]) by imf07.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D3E84000A for ; Thu, 20 Feb 2025 22:53:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf07.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=linux.dev header.s=key1 header.b=vo90Yjrx; spf=pass (imf07.hostedemail.com: domain of kent.overstreet@linux.dev designates 91.218.175.188 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kent.overstreet@linux.dev; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=linux.dev ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1740092028; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=dYTlYwWRTSP04TlrbbWePbu9bqv4xVJsVyBcl0fpGrU=; b=KJpCvL94E/7II73qgWefWC7pVZVyArhldPuPY6SiBAG4gDSnCvv0rsBu3Cc7p+j+BYuUFY S9/EU42x3lpXKxXNVOlO6tukLUIT1Tm+7IUvPdyDKaTONY/VrhOeXEejvDhPVHPh/Xf1kl hMKobOIOKIcmTUO3D8iwNz1BeiOW2QQ= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf07.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=linux.dev header.s=key1 header.b=vo90Yjrx; spf=pass (imf07.hostedemail.com: domain of kent.overstreet@linux.dev designates 91.218.175.188 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kent.overstreet@linux.dev; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=linux.dev ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1740092028; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=jSJsfJSBrZgVq3VLJ9F3P1t9RAC4c97MJSpmW0a0TdUbOkREQ728DjMbVm3x5/Q2qT3392 v0MqqUCfRoa8qM8U4pFGXLiZxkMyioOSV05DK79kJz7/fLUNItTNK5SsJc0eLVokl3hfj+ qs3vscy+oIPaNwYLCUdpqHZfpNRTUn4= Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:53:41 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1740092025; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=dYTlYwWRTSP04TlrbbWePbu9bqv4xVJsVyBcl0fpGrU=; b=vo90YjrxgfoSKsGQYQffw+W5T5sQZqnSFmUv9wcUnaV3DATraojnqZhwPiwIyO+i0EBbMd QPyRxywhvosny+rO/iNYwNFFQnAyPvK+fyUlSizRZ7nBi/rTMzciicfYoGlwQ1XSKyQHKq JWATA4Ui/VDtX0wNADuTdJY5erICwwU= X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Kent Overstreet To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Matthew Wilcox , Hillf Danton , Byungchul Park , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, kernel_team@skhynix.com, conduct@kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v12 00/26] LUF(Lazy Unmap Flush) reducing tlb numbers over 90% Message-ID: References: <20250220052027.58847-1-byungchul@sk.com> <20250220103223.2360-1-hdanton@sina.com> <20250220114920.2383-1-hdanton@sina.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Server: rspam08 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 5D3E84000A X-Stat-Signature: sgqjtfexzh8u4euih8or9qqutwqc9tf1 X-HE-Tag: 1740092028-510966 X-HE-Meta: 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 JYLROurx FwV/a7FNbnapld9Ixe9HgLpuxwVwQZMegfWcDf7kVRHcNSLVrMl8v0FUYmVgao1P6M96DTS3MDoW3TXGwlR14nO1fx0ggI3icSy7yCWkjpvZ0WGTizSbCe9SPaiO/cseAIN7F69T+MgGBE7Jk6gi2ATnX1zW5u4H3ZWHdIs0FOcqGU51o2dR3a+4v7Q== X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 10:09:45AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 01:54:13PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 07:49:19PM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote: > > > On Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:09:35 +0900 Byungchul Park wrote: > > > > Just in case that I don't understand what you meant and for better > > > > understanding, can you provide a simple and problematic example from > > > > the u-a-f? > > > > > > > Tell us if it is illegal to commit rape without pregnancy in your home town? > > > > Hillf, this is unacceptable language. You need to apologise. > > Agreed. WTF Hillf? Where did that come from? Is this how you talk to your > co-workers? > > I'll tell you what would happen in my home town. If someone said > that to a co-worker, they would likely be terminated. I can't agree with the "this is a firing offence" approach. We're a community, no one is employed by anyone else here; we work together because we have to and we have to figure out how to get along. We work via consensus, not appeals to authority. However - language like that can _and has_ driven away valuable and long standing members of our community, so people will feel strongly about this. Hillf, I'm going to share a story off list.