Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add mm GUP section

[Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>]

On 5/8/25 14:23, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
>>
>> M for "PAGE ALLOCATOR", hmmm ..., I was hoping that Vlastimil might have
>> capacity for that? :)
> 
> Vlastimil? ;)
> 
> I'd certainly support this.

OK, can do, thanks.

>>
>>
>>
>> Not 100% sure what to do with
>>
>> * include/linux/page_isolation.h
>> * mm/page_isolation.c
>>
>> (I hate the word "page isolation")
>>
>> They are mostly about page migration (either for alloc_contig... or memory
>> hotunplug). Likely they should either go to the MIGRATION section or to the
>> PAGE ALLOCATOR? Maybe MIGRATION makes more sense. Thoughts?
> 
> I mean it explicitly relates to migrate type and migration so seems to me
> it ought to be in migration.
> 
> Though migrate type + the machinary around it is a product of the physical
> page allocator (I even cover it in the 'physical memory' section of the
> book).
> 
> I wonder if our soon-to-be page allocator maintainer Vlastimil has
> thoughts? ;)
> 
> I'd vote for migration though to be honest.

I checked the code briefly and although migratetypes are related to
migration, it seems rather page allocator code to me.

In fact if I didn't miss these files, I would have included them when
proposing the PAGE ALLOCATOR section.
Zi Yan has a series on that topic now and is one of the R: in PAGE
ALLOCATOR. What do you think?

>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>>
>> David / dhildenb
>>