From: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm: vmalloc: Let user to control huge vmalloc default behavior
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2021 14:14:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <eb1813ff-e775-3bb8-b0d0-848d01bdf3e3@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YckwuA8CWcQpQdGO@casper.infradead.org>
On 2021/12/27 11:19, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 09:44:24AM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
>> On 2021/12/27 1:36, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>>> Le 26/12/2021 à 09:39, Kefeng Wang a écrit :
>>>> Add HUGE_VMALLOC_DEFAULT_ENABLED to let user to choose whether or
>>>> not enable huge vmalloc mappings by default, and this could make
>>>> more architectures to enable huge vmalloc mappings feature but
>>>> don't want to enable it by default.
>>>>
>>>> Add hugevmalloc=on/off parameter to enable or disable this feature
>>>> at boot time, nohugevmalloc is still supported and equivalent to
>>>> hugevmalloc=off.
>>> Is there a real added value to have the user be able to select that ?
>>>
>>> If the architecture supports it, is there any good reason to not use it ?
>> There are some disadvantages[1], one of the main concerns is the possible
>>
>> memory waste, we have backported this feature to our kernel 5.10, but our
>>
>> downstream in our some scenario(especially in embedded), they don't want
>>
>> it enabled by default, and others want it, this is why patch1 comes.
>>
>>> Why not just do like PPC and enable it by default ? Why should it be
>>> enabled by default on PPC but disabled by default on ARM64 and X86 ?
>> The PPC is default enabled, we don't changes this behavior.
>>
>> Maybe upstream is not care about this, as I said in cover-letter, if
>> arm64/x86
>>
>> don't want patch1, we could only just select config to enable it.
>>
>> Let's wait for more feedback.
> We should not have different defaults by architecture. Either we change
> the default for PPC, or x86 & arm should have the same default as PPC.
Ok, since HUGE_VMALLOC_DEFAULT_ENABLED is introduced, we could make it
default y, not only select it on PPC, then the ppc/arm64/x86 have same
default value.
And if someone don't want it, they could not enable this config.
Meanwhile hugevmalloc=on/off to make this feature to enable/disable at
boot time.
I will add some explanation and resend it, thanks.
> .
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-27 6:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-26 8:39 [PATCH 0/3] mm: support huge vmalloc mapping on arm64/x86 Kefeng Wang
2021-12-26 8:39 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm: vmalloc: Let user to control huge vmalloc default behavior Kefeng Wang
2021-12-26 8:33 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-12-26 17:36 ` Christophe Leroy
2021-12-27 1:44 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-12-27 3:19 ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-12-27 6:14 ` Kefeng Wang [this message]
2021-12-26 8:39 ` [PATCH 2/3] arm64: Support huge vmalloc mappings Kefeng Wang
2021-12-26 8:39 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86: " Kefeng Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=eb1813ff-e775-3bb8-b0d0-848d01bdf3e3@huawei.com \
--to=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox