From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>,
'Hugh Dickins' <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: amusing SLUB compaction bug when CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2022 15:01:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ea6e7b10-c514-8320-05c2-4a18391a7079@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9368c760191448bba0e062709cc7c799@AcuMS.aculab.com>
On 9/29/22 13:53, David Laight wrote:
>> -static void rcu_free_slab(struct rcu_head *h)
>> +/*
>> + * rcu_free_slab() must be __aligned(4) because its address is saved
>> + * in the rcu_head field, which coincides with page->mapping, which
>> + * causes trouble if compaction mistakes it for PAGE_MAPPING_MOVABLE.
>> + */
>> +__aligned(4) static void rcu_free_slab(struct rcu_head *h)
>> {
>> struct slab *slab = container_of(h, struct slab, rcu_head);
>>
>
> Isn't that going to cause grief with options that align
> functions on 16/32byte boundaries when adding space for
> 'other stuff'?
How is that done exactly? Also having higher alignment (16/32) is not in
conflict with asking for 4?
> David
>
> -
> Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
> Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-29 13:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-28 5:16 Hugh Dickins
2022-09-28 5:49 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-09-28 13:48 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-09-28 15:09 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-09-28 16:20 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-09-28 17:50 ` Hugh Dickins
2022-09-29 9:58 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-09-29 21:54 ` Hugh Dickins
2022-09-30 7:39 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-09-30 10:45 ` Hugh Dickins
2022-09-30 11:02 ` David Laight
2022-09-30 16:21 ` Hugh Dickins
2022-09-30 21:34 ` David Laight
2022-10-02 5:48 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-10-03 17:00 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-10-04 14:26 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-10-04 14:40 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-10-05 11:07 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-10-24 14:35 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-10-24 15:06 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-10-24 15:24 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-10-24 16:49 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-10-25 4:19 ` Hugh Dickins
2022-10-25 9:17 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-10-25 15:45 ` Hugh Dickins
2022-10-25 13:47 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-10-25 14:08 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-10-26 10:52 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-10-26 12:29 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-11-04 15:57 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-09-29 11:53 ` David Laight
2022-09-29 13:01 ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2022-09-29 14:04 ` David Laight
2022-09-28 17:56 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-09-28 19:53 ` Joel Fernandes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ea6e7b10-c514-8320-05c2-4a18391a7079@suse.cz \
--to=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
--cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox