Re: [PATCH 1/8] mm/vmscan: remove redundant folio_test_swapbacked check when folio is file lru

[Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>]

On 2022/3/30 16:13, Muchun Song wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 9:26 PM Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> wrote:
>>
>> When folio is file lru, folio_test_swapbacked is guaranteed to be true. So
>> it's unnecessary to check it here again. No functional change intended.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>  mm/vmscan.c | 3 +--
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
>> index 1678802e03e7..7c1a9713bfc9 100644
>> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
>> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
>> @@ -1434,8 +1434,7 @@ static void folio_check_dirty_writeback(struct folio *folio,
>>          * Anonymous pages are not handled by flushers and must be written
>>          * from reclaim context. Do not stall reclaim based on them
>>          */
>> -       if (!folio_is_file_lru(folio) ||
>> -           (folio_test_anon(folio) && !folio_test_swapbacked(folio))) {
>> +       if (!folio_is_file_lru(folio) || folio_test_anon(folio)) {
> 
> At least your login is no problem since folio_is_file_lru() is equal to
> !folio_test_swapbacked().  But the new code is not clear to me.
> The old code is easy to understand, e.g. folio_test_anon(folio) &&
> !folio_test_swapbacked(folio) tells us that the anon pages which
> do not need to be swapped should be skipped. So I'm neutral on
> the patch.

Thanks for your comment. The previous one might look more common:
folio_test_anon(folio) && !folio_test_swapbacked(folio) means folio
is MADV_FREE and can be freed without swapping out. And I remove the
unneeded !folio_test_swapbacked(folio) check at the expense of losing
minor readability. If it is not worth doing this, I will drop this
patch.

Thanks.

> 
> .
>