From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C1CEC433F5 for ; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 15:07:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id D70266B0072; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 11:07:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id CF6F36B0073; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 11:07:57 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id B72746B0074; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 11:07:57 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0102.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.102]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3B066B0072 for ; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 11:07:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin16.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AC3694FA4 for ; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 15:07:57 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79268723394.16.89C81E5 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by imf27.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B422040035 for ; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 15:07:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1647875276; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ZFVfxmzhaFPMubA718aiLUSwyIk5+iMjz6qfYM1xb4A=; b=Y9d1GeB1ikL7K23mfJ8pybHaLISLTyF1gN+WQe/C/Eu1pBa8k1bsPGBz/5chG4sxUOwTFw 0u+vIFhphhHV/vVXeUpaGtm1bM/D665M8NOBioWVK5o0OppfYiHYj5fPel2PXDOUUuBKN6 dcLyRQXghx6E6ukP55WWVBcXoEOj86k= Received: from mail-wm1-f69.google.com (mail-wm1-f69.google.com [209.85.128.69]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-131-Ilx-hIisMzWTAXyz9grncg-1; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 11:07:53 -0400 X-MC-Unique: Ilx-hIisMzWTAXyz9grncg-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f69.google.com with SMTP id t124-20020a1c4682000000b0038c8e8f8212so2704420wma.2 for ; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 08:07:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:organization:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZFVfxmzhaFPMubA718aiLUSwyIk5+iMjz6qfYM1xb4A=; b=VzprNcFZtJkP/cpNYNQE1vmUH8tQMvv6CvdxT747haVmPMubE6pbIO2p32qUM0Fh8c fUIF3jpAQdQ6nNuI3zKhTLgIpDqKJObfhHXz1guhzSYitsTO71wubmb9sHdBMo4rYZU2 ZvuLhgarhNItB1bkm59bjnfIy7Y2kwkgm0MvcGjJZwi6mPu7mM37MG7HklyEwy9oacFp uuByLJ5VC0U+QyJsAu0M09QLXSFs74H8ToJgQYyhJDTrwp+z1eEiOkuaRL7C7kyYLnD+ Vp5u6nabyH/H8UTnPCgqb2+pOZhtHMrSeiVv2gryRm1EJL0dmyxPIEN261Hsd26x03rd O5Yw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530zIfkgdJJfmtHYhlYFGbu/tHymyRTLKlreAHOC3Tix4o9pjsi5 6Ry2/RbLlJLH/HKlnryI2JKTlJ1SbY2Wjm/H7IKYsRth8RY3/5xDLaanQZzJDctoUI4h/AX1EWg +Ds7rfvXzTNk= X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:4ed2:b0:38c:93ad:4825 with SMTP id g18-20020a05600c4ed200b0038c93ad4825mr11133407wmq.181.1647875271731; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 08:07:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyKoU0nGg0p5jibfOm4Ew1arWHbW+SRBIfaAS1QHWKwXAqgZDqMtY1m9j1jU9wOkm317ZDDsQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:4ed2:b0:38c:93ad:4825 with SMTP id g18-20020a05600c4ed200b0038c93ad4825mr11133335wmq.181.1647875271332; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 08:07:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2003:cb:c704:4900:849b:f76e:5e1f:ff95? (p200300cbc7044900849bf76e5e1fff95.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:cb:c704:4900:849b:f76e:5e1f:ff95]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g10-20020a5d46ca000000b00203fd86e198sm7209759wrs.96.2022.03.21.08.07.49 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 21 Mar 2022 08:07:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 16:07:48 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.6.2 Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/7] arm64/pgtable: support __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_SWP_EXCLUSIVE To: Will Deacon , Catalin Marinas Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Hugh Dickins , Linus Torvalds , David Rientjes , Shakeel Butt , John Hubbard , Jason Gunthorpe , Mike Kravetz , Mike Rapoport , Yang Shi , "Kirill A . Shutemov" , Matthew Wilcox , Vlastimil Babka , Jann Horn , Michal Hocko , Nadav Amit , Rik van Riel , Roman Gushchin , Andrea Arcangeli , Peter Xu , Donald Dutile , Christoph Hellwig , Oleg Nesterov , Jan Kara , Liang Zhang , Pedro Gomes , Oded Gabbay , Michael Ellerman , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Heiko Carstens , Vasily Gorbik , Alexander Gordeev , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , linux-mm@kvack.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org References: <20220315141837.137118-1-david@redhat.com> <20220315141837.137118-5-david@redhat.com> <20220321143802.GC11145@willie-the-truck> From: David Hildenbrand Organization: Red Hat In-Reply-To: <20220321143802.GC11145@willie-the-truck> X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: B422040035 X-Stat-Signature: awqax44cgwtujagymxs9fx8wuczbdeo8 X-Rspam-User: Authentication-Results: imf27.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=Y9d1GeB1; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=none (imf27.hostedemail.com: domain of david@redhat.com has no SPF policy when checking 170.10.129.124) smtp.mailfrom=david@redhat.com X-Rspamd-Server: rspam02 X-HE-Tag: 1647875276-295763 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On 21.03.22 15:38, Will Deacon wrote: > On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 06:27:01PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 03:18:34PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote: >>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-prot.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-prot.h >>> index b1e1b74d993c..62e0ebeed720 100644 >>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-prot.h >>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-prot.h >>> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ >>> * Software defined PTE bits definition. >>> */ >>> #define PTE_WRITE (PTE_DBM) /* same as DBM (51) */ >>> +#define PTE_SWP_EXCLUSIVE (_AT(pteval_t, 1) << 2) /* only for swp ptes */ >> >> I think we can use bit 1 here. >> >>> @@ -909,12 +925,13 @@ static inline pmd_t pmdp_establish(struct vm_area_struct *vma, >>> /* >>> * Encode and decode a swap entry: >>> * bits 0-1: present (must be zero) >>> - * bits 2-7: swap type >>> + * bits 2: remember PG_anon_exclusive >>> + * bits 3-7: swap type >>> * bits 8-57: swap offset >>> * bit 58: PTE_PROT_NONE (must be zero) >> >> I don't remember exactly why we reserved bits 0 and 1 when, from the >> hardware perspective, it's sufficient for bit 0 to be 0 and the whole >> pte becomes invalid. We use bit 1 as the 'table' bit (when 0 at pmd >> level, it's a huge page) but we shouldn't check for this on a swap >> entry. > > I'm a little worried that when we're dealing with huge mappings at the > PMD level we might lose the ability to distinguish them from a pte-level > mapping with this new flag set if we use bit 1. A similar issue to this > was fixed a long time ago by 59911ca4325d ("ARM64: mm: Move PTE_PROT_NONE > bit") when we used to use bit 1 for PTE_PROT_NONE. > > Is something like: > > pmd_to_swp_entry(swp_entry_to_pmd(pmd)); Note that __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_SWP_EXCLUSIVE currently only applies to actual swap entries, not non-swap entries (migration, hwpoison, ...). So it really only applies to PTEs -- PMDs are not applicable. So the example you gave cannot possibly have that bit set. From what I understand, it should be fine. But I have no real preference: I can also just stick to the original patch, whatever you prefer. Thanks! -- Thanks, David / dhildenb