From: Michal Nazarewicz <mnazarewicz@google.com>
To: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Ankita Garg <ankita@in.ibm.com>,
Daniel Walker <dwalker@codeaurora.org>,
Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Jesse Barker <jesse.barker@linaro.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Shariq Hasnain <shariq.hasnain@linaro.org>,
Chunsang Jeong <chunsang.jeong@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] fixup! mm: alloc_contig_freed_pages() added
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 17:19:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ea1bc31120e0670a044de6af7b3c67203c178065.1316617681.git.mina86@mina86.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1315505152.3114.9.camel@nimitz>
From: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
---
include/linux/page-isolation.h | 4 ++-
mm/page_alloc.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
2 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> On Fri, 2011-08-19 at 16:27 +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>> +unsigned long alloc_contig_freed_pages(unsigned long start, unsigned
>> long end,
>> + gfp_t flag)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long pfn = start, count;
>> + struct page *page;
>> + struct zone *zone;
>> + int order;
>> +
>> + VM_BUG_ON(!pfn_valid(start));
>> + zone = page_zone(pfn_to_page(start));
On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 20:05:52 +0200, Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> This implies that start->end are entirely contained in a single zone.
> What enforces that? If some higher layer enforces that, I think we
> probably need at least a VM_BUG_ON() in here and a comment about who
> enforces it.
>> + spin_lock_irq(&zone->lock);
>> +
>> + page = pfn_to_page(pfn);
>> + for (;;) {
>> + VM_BUG_ON(page_count(page) || !PageBuddy(page));
>> + list_del(&page->lru);
>> + order = page_order(page);
>> + zone->free_area[order].nr_free--;
>> + rmv_page_order(page);
>> + __mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_FREE_PAGES, -(1UL << order));
>> + pfn += 1 << order;
>> + if (pfn >= end)
>> + break;
>> + VM_BUG_ON(!pfn_valid(pfn));
>> + page += 1 << order;
>> + }
> This 'struct page *'++ stuff is OK, but only for small, aligned areas.
> For at least some of the sparsemem modes (non-VMEMMAP), you could walk
> off of the end of the section_mem_map[] when you cross a MAX_ORDER
> boundary. I'd feel a little bit more comfortable if pfn_to_page() was
> being done each time, or only occasionally when you cross a section
> boundary.
Do the attached changes seem to make sense?
I wanted to avoid calling pfn_to_page() each time as it seem fairly
expensive in sparsemem and disctontig modes. At the same time, the
macro trickery is so that users of sparsemem-vmemmap and flatmem won't
have to pay the price.
diff --git a/include/linux/page-isolation.h b/include/linux/page-isolation.h
index b2a81fd..003c52f 100644
--- a/include/linux/page-isolation.h
+++ b/include/linux/page-isolation.h
@@ -46,11 +46,13 @@ static inline void unset_migratetype_isolate(struct page *page)
{
__unset_migratetype_isolate(page, MIGRATE_MOVABLE);
}
+
+/* The below functions must be run on a range from a single zone. */
extern unsigned long alloc_contig_freed_pages(unsigned long start,
unsigned long end, gfp_t flag);
extern int alloc_contig_range(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
gfp_t flags, unsigned migratetype);
-extern void free_contig_pages(struct page *page, int nr_pages);
+extern void free_contig_pages(unsigned long pfn, unsigned nr_pages);
/*
* For migration.
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 46e78d4..32fda5d 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -5716,9 +5716,41 @@ out:
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lock, flags);
}
+#if defined(CONFIG_FLATMEM) || defined(CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP)
+
+/*
+ * In FLATMEM and CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP we can safely increment the page
+ * pointer and get the same value as if we were to get by calling
+ * pfn_to_page() on incremented pfn counter.
+ */
+#define __contig_next_page(page, pageblock_left, pfn, increment) \
+ ((page) + (increment))
+
+#define __contig_first_page(pageblock_left, pfn) pfn_to_page(pfn)
+
+#else
+
+/*
+ * If we cross pageblock boundary, make sure we get a valid page pointer. If
+ * we are within pageblock, incrementing the pointer is good enough, and is
+ * a bit of an optimisation.
+ */
+#define __contig_next_page(page, pageblock_left, pfn, increment) \
+ (likely((pageblock_left) -= (increment)) ? (page) + (increment) \
+ : (((pageblock_left) = pageblock_nr_pages), pfn_to_page(pfn)))
+
+#define __contig_first_page(pageblock_left, pfn) ( \
+ ((pageblock_left) = pageblock_nr_pages - \
+ ((pfn) & (pageblock_nr_pages - 1))), \
+ pfn_to_page(pfn))
+
+
+#endif
+
unsigned long alloc_contig_freed_pages(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
gfp_t flag)
{
+ unsigned long pageblock_left __unused;
unsigned long pfn = start, count;
struct page *page;
struct zone *zone;
@@ -5729,27 +5761,37 @@ unsigned long alloc_contig_freed_pages(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
spin_lock_irq(&zone->lock);
- page = pfn_to_page(pfn);
+ page = __contig_first_page(pageblock_left, pfn);
for (;;) {
- VM_BUG_ON(page_count(page) || !PageBuddy(page));
+ VM_BUG_ON(!page_count(page) || !PageBuddy(page) ||
+ page_zone(page) != zone);
+
list_del(&page->lru);
order = page_order(page);
+ count = 1UL << order;
zone->free_area[order].nr_free--;
rmv_page_order(page);
- __mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_FREE_PAGES, -(1UL << order));
- pfn += 1 << order;
+ __mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_FREE_PAGES, -(long)count);
+
+ pfn += count;
if (pfn >= end)
break;
VM_BUG_ON(!pfn_valid(pfn));
- page += 1 << order;
+
+ page = __contig_next_page(page, pageblock_left, pfn, count);
}
spin_unlock_irq(&zone->lock);
/* After this, pages in the range can be freed one be one */
- page = pfn_to_page(start);
- for (count = pfn - start; count; --count, ++page)
+ count = pfn - start;
+ pfn = start;
+ page = __contig_first_page(pageblock_left, pfn);
+ for (; count; --count) {
prep_new_page(page, 0, flag);
+ ++pfn;
+ page = __contig_next_page(page, pageblock_left, pfn, 1);
+ }
return pfn;
}
@@ -5903,10 +5945,16 @@ done:
return ret;
}
-void free_contig_pages(struct page *page, int nr_pages)
+void free_contig_pages(unsigned long pfn, unsigned nr_pages)
{
- for (; nr_pages; --nr_pages, ++page)
+ unsigned long pageblock_left __unused;
+ struct page *page = __contig_first_page(pageblock_left, pfn);
+
+ while (nr_pages--) {
__free_page(page);
+ ++pfn;
+ page = __contig_next_page(page, pageblock_left, pfn, 1);
+ }
}
#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
--
1.7.3.1
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-21 15:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-19 14:27 [PATCHv15 0/8] Contiguous Memory Allocator Marek Szyprowski
2011-08-19 14:27 ` [PATCH 1/8] mm: move some functions from memory_hotplug.c to page_isolation.c Marek Szyprowski
2011-08-19 14:27 ` [PATCH 2/8] mm: alloc_contig_freed_pages() added Marek Szyprowski
2011-09-08 18:05 ` Dave Hansen
2011-09-21 13:17 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2011-09-21 14:07 ` Dave Hansen
2011-09-21 15:19 ` Michal Nazarewicz [this message]
2011-09-21 15:45 ` [PATCH 1/3] fixup! " Dave Hansen
2011-09-21 16:26 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2011-09-21 16:30 ` Dave Hansen
2011-08-19 14:27 ` [PATCH 3/8] mm: alloc_contig_range() added Marek Szyprowski
2011-08-19 14:27 ` [PATCH 4/8] mm: MIGRATE_CMA migration type added Marek Szyprowski
2011-08-19 14:27 ` [PATCH 5/8] mm: MIGRATE_CMA isolation functions added Marek Szyprowski
2011-08-19 14:27 ` [PATCH 6/8] drivers: add Contiguous Memory Allocator Marek Szyprowski
2011-08-19 14:27 ` [PATCH 7/8] ARM: integrate CMA with DMA-mapping subsystem Marek Szyprowski
2011-09-08 17:27 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-09-21 13:47 ` Marek Szyprowski
2011-08-19 14:27 ` [PATCH 8/8] ARM: S5PV210: example of CMA private area for FIMC device on Goni board Marek Szyprowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ea1bc31120e0670a044de6af7b3c67203c178065.1316617681.git.mina86@mina86.com \
--to=mnazarewicz@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ankita@in.ibm.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=chunsang.jeong@linaro.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dwalker@codeaurora.org \
--cc=jesse.barker@linaro.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=shariq.hasnain@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox