From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1428AC43461 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 00:27:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 508D5208DB for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 00:27:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=oracle.com header.i=@oracle.com header.b="D/M2X9A5" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 508D5208DB Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=oracle.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 878116B0088; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 20:27:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 830608E0001; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 20:27:07 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 73D036B008A; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 20:27:07 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0061.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.61]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AB666B0088 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 20:27:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin19.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 164881E18 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 00:27:07 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77263406094.19.woman34_0508ce92710c Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin19.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA7C91AD1B5 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 00:27:06 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: woman34_0508ce92710c X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 9420 Received: from aserp2120.oracle.com (aserp2120.oracle.com [141.146.126.78]) by imf28.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 00:27:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pps.filterd (aserp2120.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp2120.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 08F0PmqX086919; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 00:26:35 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=subject : to : cc : references : from : message-id : date : mime-version : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=corp-2020-01-29; bh=/lp3ssLFIF9grSJMfNvaz6HxSc4T07AGymekTnSNWLo=; b=D/M2X9A5slRKJGp/rXq/kiEFcmcwXxFp2tHp1UdyuCxEDowoaMk+WSsA5KDBiQfu0BbF IxAjf2DV3zJt5aie3at8QvzeCnyGBMvJCcpLlD8eBGkkYEHnszRIv034FamClD4HTlCe GPZjnzW/wx52Di89jiafv788Bm/pGFxTkkFcjKMtds5YKGJv+ppHMR7hXnY4Q4xHaoTo mdw6yK6SZ0RuFlRNmkAa0tjTL4Ra4U+YaUT9/frt3SPn0RMctWTZyvzpuc/5zgLlE9n8 QMDjM5ZkbTrfnFMoneGIiAkTa8dq+6KCbiC3LC5LPwqhRaFmI9dIO+dMCtr8RQnVB7G0 yw== Received: from aserp3030.oracle.com (aserp3030.oracle.com [141.146.126.71]) by aserp2120.oracle.com with ESMTP id 33gp9m1r7j-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 15 Sep 2020 00:26:35 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (aserp3030.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp3030.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 08F09toZ049766; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 00:24:35 GMT Received: from aserv0121.oracle.com (aserv0121.oracle.com [141.146.126.235]) by aserp3030.oracle.com with ESMTP id 33h7wn3qga-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 15 Sep 2020 00:24:35 +0000 Received: from abhmp0005.oracle.com (abhmp0005.oracle.com [141.146.116.11]) by aserv0121.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id 08F0OSfW003043; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 00:24:28 GMT Received: from [10.74.107.135] (/10.74.107.135) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 00:24:28 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/11] xen/manage: keep track of the on-going suspend mode To: Anchal Agarwal Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org, jgross@suse.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, kamatam@amazon.com, sstabellini@kernel.org, konrad.wilk@oracle.com, roger.pau@citrix.com, axboe@kernel.dk, davem@davemloft.net, rjw@rjwysocki.net, len.brown@intel.com, pavel@ucw.cz, peterz@infradead.org, eduval@amazon.com, sblbir@amazon.com, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, vkuznets@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dwmw@amazon.co.uk, benh@kernel.crashing.org References: <9b970e12491107afda0c1d4a6f154b52d90346ac.1598042152.git.anchalag@amazon.com> <4b2bbc8b-7817-271a-4ff0-5ee5df956049@oracle.com> <20200914214754.GA19975@dev-dsk-anchalag-2a-9c2d1d96.us-west-2.amazon.com> From: boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com Organization: Oracle Corporation Message-ID: Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 20:24:22 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200914214754.GA19975@dev-dsk-anchalag-2a-9c2d1d96.us-west-2.amazon.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9744 signatures=668679 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2009150000 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9744 signatures=668679 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 bulkscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 malwarescore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 priorityscore=1501 suspectscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2009150001 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: DA7C91AD1B5 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 100.00] X-Rspamd-Server: rspam03 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On 9/14/20 5:47 PM, Anchal Agarwal wrote: > On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 11:43:30AM -0400, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com wrote: >> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe. >> >> >> >> On 8/21/20 6:25 PM, Anchal Agarwal wrote: >>> Though, accquirng pm_mutex is still right thing to do, we may >>> see deadlock if PM hibernation is interrupted by Xen suspend. >>> PM hibernation depends on xenwatch thread to process xenbus state >>> transactions, but the thread will sleep to wait pm_mutex which is >>> already held by PM hibernation context in the scenario. Xen shutdown >>> code may need some changes to avoid the issue. >> >> >> Is it Xen's shutdown or suspend code that needs to address this? (Or I >> may not understand what the problem is that you are describing) >> > Its Xen suspend code I think. If we do not take the system_transition_mutex > in do_suspend then if hibernation is triggered in parallel to xen suspend there > could be issues. But you *are* taking this mutex to avoid this exact race, aren't you? > Now this is still theoretical in my case and I havent been able > to reproduce such a race. So the approach the original author took was to take > this lock which to me seems right. > And its Xen suspend and not Xen Shutdown. So basically if this scenario > happens I am of the view one of other will fail to occur then how do we recover > or avoid this at all. > > Does that answer your question? > >>> + >>> +static int xen_setup_pm_notifier(void) >>> +{ >>> + if (!xen_hvm_domain() || xen_initial_domain()) >>> + return -ENODEV; >> >> I don't think this works anymore. > What do you mean? > The first check is for xen domain types and other is for architecture support. > The reason I put this check here is because I wanted to segregate the two. > I do not want to register this notifier at all for !hmv guest and also if its > an initial control domain. > The arm check only lands in notifier because once hibernate() api is called -> > calls pm_notifier_call_chain for PM_HIBERNATION_PREPARE this will fail for > aarch64. > Once we have support for aarch64 this notifier can go away altogether. > > Is there any other reason I may be missing why we should move this check to > notifier? Not registering this notifier is equivalent to having it return NOTIFY_OK. In your earlier versions just returning NOTIFY_OK was not sufficient for hibernation to proceed since the notifier would also need to set suspend_mode appropriately. But now your notifier essentially filters out unsupported configurations. And so if it is not called your configuration (e.g. PV domain) will be considered supported. >> In the past your notifier would set suspend_mode (or something) but now >> it really doesn't do anything except reports an error in some (ARM) cases. >> >> So I think you should move this check into the notifier. >> (And BTW I still think PM_SUSPEND_PREPARE should return an error too. >> The fact that we are using "suspend" in xen routine names is irrelevant) >> > I may have send "not-updated" version of the notifier's function change. > > + switch (pm_event) { > + case PM_HIBERNATION_PREPARE: > + /* Guest hibernation is not supported for aarch64 currently*/ > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64)) { > + ret = NOTIFY_BAD; > + break; > + } > + case PM_RESTORE_PREPARE: > + case PM_POST_RESTORE: > + case PM_POST_HIBERNATION: > + default: > + ret = NOTIFY_OK; > + } There is no difference on x86 between this code and what you sent earlier. In both instances PM_SUSPEND_PREPARE will return NOTIFY_OK. On ARM this code will allow suspend to proceed (which is not what we want). -boris > > With the above path PM_SUSPEND_PREPARE will go all together. Does that > resolves this issue? I wanted to get rid of all SUSPEND_* as they are not needed > here clearly. > The only reason I kept it there is if someone tries to trigger hibernation on > ARM instances they should get an error. As I am not sure about the current > behavior. There may be a better way to not invoke hibernation on ARM DomU's and > get rid of this block all together. > > Again, sorry for sending in the half baked fix. My workspace switch may have > caused the error. >> >> >> -boris >> > Anchal >> >>> + return register_pm_notifier(&xen_pm_notifier_block); >>> +} >>> +