From: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] selftests/mm: remove flaky header check
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2025 14:24:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e971e44e-5539-4fc4-8128-0ce9c3d10a38@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5f866c1a-c8cd-4dc6-b312-9017cef89920@sirena.org.uk>
On 17/12/2025 11:04, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2025 at 02:26:30PM +0000, Kevin Brodsky wrote:
>> Commit 96ed62ea0298 ("mm: page_frag: fix a compile error when kernel
>> is not compiled") introduced a check to avoid attempting to build
>> the page_frag module if <linux/page_frag_cache.h> is missing.
>>
>> Unfortunately this check only works if KDIR points to
>> /lib/modules/... or an in-tree kernel build. It always fails if KDIR
>> points to an out-of-tree build (i.e. when the kernel was built with
>> O=$KDIR make) because only generated headers are present under
>> $KDIR/include/ in that case.
>>
>> <linux/page_frag_cache.h> was added more than a year ago (v6.13) so
>> we can probably live without that check.
> More generally building selftests with random older kernel versions
> isn't really something that's expected to be robust:
I suppose that Documentation/dev-tools/kselftest.rst talks about
*running* against older kernels, not *building* against them. That said,
we are dealing with an out-of-tree kernel module here, so the two are
essentially the same... Yunsheng suggested an updated check that I think
is reasonable, maybe it is a reasonable compromise?
- Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-18 13:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-16 14:26 [PATCH 0/4] Various mm kselftests improvements/fixes Kevin Brodsky
2025-12-16 14:26 ` [PATCH 1/4] selftests/mm: remove flaky header check Kevin Brodsky
2025-12-17 3:18 ` Yunsheng Lin
2025-12-17 9:58 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-12-18 7:21 ` Yunsheng Lin
2025-12-17 10:04 ` Mark Brown
2025-12-18 13:24 ` Kevin Brodsky [this message]
2025-12-18 14:25 ` Mark Brown
2025-12-29 15:40 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-12-16 14:26 ` [PATCH 2/4] selftests/mm: pass down full CC and CFLAGS to check_config.sh Kevin Brodsky
2025-12-18 8:04 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-16 14:26 ` [PATCH 3/4] selftests/mm: fix faulting-in code in pagemap_ioctl test Kevin Brodsky
2025-12-16 14:56 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-12-16 15:11 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-12-18 8:05 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-18 13:18 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-12-19 8:29 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-29 11:46 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-12-16 14:26 ` [PATCH 4/4] selftests/mm: fix exit code in pagemap_ioctl Kevin Brodsky
2025-12-16 14:58 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-12-17 10:08 ` Mark Brown
2025-12-18 13:20 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-12-18 8:07 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e971e44e-5539-4fc4-8128-0ce9c3d10a38@arm.com \
--to=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linyunsheng@huawei.com \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox