From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0D48C432BE for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 16:19:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 539B16069E for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 16:19:10 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 539B16069E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id E526A6B0071; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 12:19:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id DDA746B0072; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 12:19:09 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id C06178D0001; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 12:19:09 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0167.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.167]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A573F6B0071 for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 12:19:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin26.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24082299BB for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 16:19:08 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78539513976.26.BF2EDD4 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by imf02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A19407001A05 for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 16:19:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1630513147; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Hn3nm0nrge1oo599gvCipHpqJl0l71Bvv3viUvrNNYo=; b=G0zQF1ZIce/b/DyFZim1RLWpyzTPFJN0EYyXi5F9xtM7XMRileWj3YsfW+LOvXdGfn3v0s 1RysMVeBo78HXfLoeZ04YUlypD3DNFL6OsvCR76cuED0l9Ty5NP9I7tv923mWYpRZ480Hv MGva8yl4C5Cm0Z/a1l7456cmlmeTy58= Received: from mail-wm1-f69.google.com (mail-wm1-f69.google.com [209.85.128.69]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-284-SM3hj7bNNY-a8i8PbNapNQ-1; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 12:19:06 -0400 X-MC-Unique: SM3hj7bNNY-a8i8PbNapNQ-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f69.google.com with SMTP id y188-20020a1c7dc5000000b002e80e0b2f87so36669wmc.1 for ; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 09:19:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Hn3nm0nrge1oo599gvCipHpqJl0l71Bvv3viUvrNNYo=; b=JaO8Xn5VnTql+MYXdd0je8eeFimfpL4WOf7YyIT1Dll+aTYwh6gBHCk/a9gAoVpCwx 6jVT9zUSZEMLPBG3xhrFGEc2eb7IU1o8YYaUYvIbaZJ9RR6wd7MY6PlTfZgrOzQc+Yds WHSHnjQdNmPIV7wN+/piKc9YzVJ00EYAqHfufhj9xoMPIVQ9An/+oa3Io6g71ppHwuge AH8FdF+rwHizi2Bko8APZmAf/yTfUpgf2A9WDhiDt+0Ob4rTLfhkwvF2LR6la6Lp0+Wu BCoBHYqtfzIEUcfkERlwQSQ7n95GSs58poBfWZxF9ZdaTNv+e8ovo6m1RUVvHC8QaNhS np2Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531keVK2kKRVVp+3y4ttKru05HUmynesyvTKyX0EO3Vt4dZ21KS7 nJ4J59aoKle1kj1B80sFRh/dNCiECyEbm8KNF46AI+5nN98irZFjN3LKSsihMTR8rYUIbTNqPdU rh4DF0W0Kz80= X-Received: by 2002:adf:b743:: with SMTP id n3mr159635wre.243.1630513144956; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 09:19:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxEYLc2dpFRaSAx0QwjaB09K1WszhkZSJzjN1zqt2OPHmSgyO/J5GfdeLl1RcvC1vWTCn0HHQ== X-Received: by 2002:adf:b743:: with SMTP id n3mr159584wre.243.1630513144716; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 09:19:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.3.132] (p4ff23f71.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [79.242.63.113]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w9sm22106619wrs.7.2021.09.01.09.19.03 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 01 Sep 2021 09:19:04 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/9] mm: free user PTE page table pages To: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: Qi Zheng , akpm@linux-foundation.org, tglx@linutronix.de, hannes@cmpxchg.org, mhocko@kernel.org, vdavydov.dev@gmail.com, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, mika.penttila@nextfour.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, songmuchun@bytedance.com References: <20210819031858.98043-1-zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> <20210819031858.98043-7-zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> <20210901135314.GA1859446@nvidia.com> <0c9766c9-6e8b-5445-83dc-9f2b71a76b4f@redhat.com> <20210901153247.GJ1721383@nvidia.com> <7789261d-6a64-c47b-be6c-c9be680e5d33@redhat.com> <20210901161613.GN1721383@nvidia.com> From: David Hildenbrand Organization: Red Hat Message-ID: Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2021 18:19:03 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210901161613.GN1721383@nvidia.com> X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Authentication-Results: imf02.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=G0zQF1ZI; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=none (imf02.hostedemail.com: domain of david@redhat.com has no SPF policy when checking 170.10.133.124) smtp.mailfrom=david@redhat.com X-Rspamd-Server: rspam06 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: A19407001A05 X-Stat-Signature: ukqoet6fdn436pnrcpjy6xeqdamj5jcg X-HE-Tag: 1630513147-329828 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On 01.09.21 18:16, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 06:13:07PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> On 01.09.21 17:32, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: >>> On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 03:57:09PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: >>>> On 01.09.21 15:53, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: >>>>> On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 11:18:55AM +0800, Qi Zheng wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c >>>>>> index 2630ed1bb4f4..30757f3b176c 100644 >>>>>> +++ b/mm/gup.c >>>>>> @@ -500,6 +500,9 @@ static struct page *follow_page_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma, >>>>>> if (unlikely(pmd_bad(*pmd))) >>>>>> return no_page_table(vma, flags); >>>>>> + if (!pte_try_get(mm, pmd)) >>>>>> + return no_page_table(vma, flags); >>>>>> + >>>>>> ptep = pte_offset_map_lock(mm, pmd, address, &ptl); >>>>> >>>>> This is not good on a performance path, the pte_try_get() is >>>>> locking/locking the same lock that pte_offset_map_lock() is getting. >>>> >>>> Yes, and we really need patch #8, anything else is just confusing reviewers. >>> >>> It is a bit better with patch 8, but it is still not optimal, we don't >>> need to do the atomic work at all if the entire ptep is accessed while >>> locked. So the above is stil not what I would expect here, even with >>> RCU. >>> >>> eg I would expect that this kind of change would work first with the >>> existing paired acessors, ie >>> >>> pte = pte_offset_map(pmd, address); >>> pte_unmap(pte); >>> >>> Should handle the refcount under the covers, and same kind of idea for >>> the _locked/_unlocked varient. >> >> See my other mail. > > Do you have a reference? Reply to the other mail you just send. > >>> Only places that don't already use that pairing should get modified. >>> >>> To do this we have to extend the API so that pte_offset_map() can >>> fail, or very cleverly return some kind of global non-present pte page >>> (I wonder if the zero page would work?) >> >> I explored both ideas (returning NULL, return a specially prepared page) and >> it didn't work in some cases where we unmap+remap etc. > > I wouldn't think it works everywhere, bit it works in a lot of places, > and it is a heck of a lot better than what is proposed here. I'd > rather see the places that can use it be moved, and the few places > that can't be opencoded. Well, I used ptep_get_map_lock() and friends. But hacking directly into ptep_map_lock() and friends wasn't possible due to all the corner cases. -- Thanks, David / dhildenb