From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: mark async iocb read as NOWAIT once some data has been, copied
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2020 11:30:47 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e8850ae5-2c9e-4c5b-0aed-893577a83512@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201017162820.GI20115@casper.infradead.org>
On 10/17/20 10:28 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 09:30:59AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> Once we've copied some data for an iocb that is marked with IOCB_WAITQ,
>> we should no longer attempt to async lock a new page. Instead make sure
>> we return the copied amount, and let the caller retry, instead of
>> returning -EIOCBQUEUED for a new page.
>>
>> This should only be possible with read-ahead disabled on the below
>> device, and multiple threads racing on the same file. Haven't been able
>> to reproduce on anything else.
>
> Wouldn't this do the job just as well?
>
> @@ -2211,6 +2211,8 @@ ssize_t generic_file_buffered_read(struct kiocb *iocb,
>
> put_page(page);
> written += ret;
> + if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_WAITQ)
> + iocb->ki_flags |= IOCB_NOWAIT;
> if (!iov_iter_count(iter))
> goto out;
> if (ret < nr) {
Indeed, that's cleaner. Let me re-test with that just to be on the safe
side, and I'll post a new one.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-17 17:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-17 15:30 Jens Axboe
2020-10-17 16:28 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-10-17 17:30 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2020-10-17 19:13 ` Kent Overstreet
2020-10-17 19:36 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e8850ae5-2c9e-4c5b-0aed-893577a83512@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kent.overstreet@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox