linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Wang Wensheng <wangwensheng4@huawei.com>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, osalvador@suse.de,
	dan.j.williams@intel.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: rui.xiang@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/sparse: Fix flags overlap in section_mem_map
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 11:05:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e838d8b5-84f1-5532-6f22-e4b729124e1c@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210427083019.110184-1-wangwensheng4@huawei.com>

On 27.04.21 10:30, Wang Wensheng wrote:
> The section_mem_map member of struct mem_section stores some flags and
> the address of struct page array of the mem_section.
> 
> Additionally the node id of the mem_section is stored during early boot,
> where the struct page array has not been allocated. In other words, the
> higher bits of section_mem_map are used for two purpose, and the node id
> should be clear properly after the early boot.
> 
> Currently the node id field is overlapped with the flag field and cannot
> be clear properly. That overlapped bits would then be treated as
> mem_section flags and may lead to unexpected side effects.
> 
> Define SECTION_NID_SHIFT using order_base_2 to ensure that the node id
> field always locates after flags field. That's why the overlap occurs -
> forgetting to increase SECTION_NID_SHIFT when adding new mem_section
> flag.
> 
> Fixes: 326e1b8f83a4 ("mm/sparsemem: introduce a SECTION_IS_EARLY flag")
> Signed-off-by: Wang Wensheng <wangwensheng4@huawei.com>
> ---
>   include/linux/mmzone.h | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> index 47946ce..b01694d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> @@ -1325,7 +1325,7 @@ extern size_t mem_section_usage_size(void);
>   #define SECTION_TAINT_ZONE_DEVICE	(1UL<<4)
>   #define SECTION_MAP_LAST_BIT		(1UL<<5)
>   #define SECTION_MAP_MASK		(~(SECTION_MAP_LAST_BIT-1))
> -#define SECTION_NID_SHIFT		3
> +#define SECTION_NID_SHIFT		order_base_2(SECTION_MAP_LAST_BIT)
>   
>   static inline struct page *__section_mem_map_addr(struct mem_section *section)
>   {
> 

Well, all sections around during boot that have an early NID are early 
... so it's not an issue with SECTION_IS_EARLY, no? I mean, it's ugly, 
but not broken.

But it's an issue with SECTION_TAINT_ZONE_DEVICE, AFAIKT. 
sparse_init_one_section() would leave the bit set if the nid happens to 
have that bit set (e.g., node 2,3). It's semi-broken then, because we 
force all pfn_to_online_page() through the slow path.


That whole section flag setting code is fragile.

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb



  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-27  9:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-27  8:30 Wang Wensheng
2021-04-27  9:05 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2021-06-23 23:09   ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2021-06-25 21:23     ` Dan Williams
2021-06-28  7:06       ` [PATCH] mm/sparse: set SECTION_NID_SHIFT to 6 Naoya Horiguchi
2021-07-06  8:36         ` David Hildenbrand
2021-07-07  4:54           ` Naoya Horiguchi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e838d8b5-84f1-5532-6f22-e4b729124e1c@redhat.com \
    --to=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=rui.xiang@huawei.com \
    --cc=wangwensheng4@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox