From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
"Xu, Pengfei" <pengfei.xu@intel.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Stefan Roesch <shr@devkernel.io>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Xin Hao <xhao@linux.alibaba.com>,
Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>, Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] migrate_pages: move split folios processing out of migrate_pages_batch()
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2023 10:23:43 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e820f68a-d1c7-c552-b924-56d97fb0b927@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230224141145.96814-3-ying.huang@intel.com>
On 2/24/2023 10:11 PM, Huang Ying wrote:
> To simplify the code logic and reduce the line number.
>
> Signed-off-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
> Cc: "Xu, Pengfei" <pengfei.xu@intel.com>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Cc: Stefan Roesch <shr@devkernel.io>
> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> Cc: Xin Hao <xhao@linux.alibaba.com>
> Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
> Cc: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
> ---
> mm/migrate.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++----------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
> index 7ac37dbbf307..91198b487e49 100644
> --- a/mm/migrate.c
> +++ b/mm/migrate.c
> @@ -1605,9 +1605,10 @@ static int migrate_hugetlbs(struct list_head *from, new_page_t get_new_page,
> static int migrate_pages_batch(struct list_head *from, new_page_t get_new_page,
> free_page_t put_new_page, unsigned long private,
> enum migrate_mode mode, int reason, struct list_head *ret_folios,
> - struct migrate_pages_stats *stats)
> + struct list_head *split_folios, struct migrate_pages_stats *stats,
> + int nr_pass)
> {
> - int retry;
> + int retry = 1;
> int large_retry = 1;
> int thp_retry = 1;
> int nr_failed = 0;
> @@ -1617,19 +1618,12 @@ static int migrate_pages_batch(struct list_head *from, new_page_t get_new_page,
> bool is_large = false;
> bool is_thp = false;
> struct folio *folio, *folio2, *dst = NULL, *dst2;
> - int rc, rc_saved, nr_pages;
> - LIST_HEAD(split_folios);
> + int rc, rc_saved = 0, nr_pages;
> LIST_HEAD(unmap_folios);
> LIST_HEAD(dst_folios);
> bool nosplit = (reason == MR_NUMA_MISPLACED);
> - bool no_split_folio_counting = false;
>
> -retry:
> - rc_saved = 0;
> - retry = 1;
> - for (pass = 0;
> - pass < NR_MAX_MIGRATE_PAGES_RETRY && (retry || large_retry);
> - pass++) {
> + for (pass = 0; pass < nr_pass && (retry || large_retry); pass++) {
> retry = 0;
> large_retry = 0;
> thp_retry = 0;
> @@ -1660,7 +1654,7 @@ static int migrate_pages_batch(struct list_head *from, new_page_t get_new_page,
> if (!thp_migration_supported() && is_thp) {
> nr_large_failed++;
> stats->nr_thp_failed++;
> - if (!try_split_folio(folio, &split_folios)) {
> + if (!try_split_folio(folio, split_folios)) {
> stats->nr_thp_split++;
> continue;
> }
> @@ -1692,7 +1686,7 @@ static int migrate_pages_batch(struct list_head *from, new_page_t get_new_page,
> stats->nr_thp_failed += is_thp;
> /* Large folio NUMA faulting doesn't split to retry. */
> if (!nosplit) {
> - int ret = try_split_folio(folio, &split_folios);
> + int ret = try_split_folio(folio, split_folios);
>
> if (!ret) {
> stats->nr_thp_split += is_thp;
> @@ -1709,18 +1703,11 @@ static int migrate_pages_batch(struct list_head *from, new_page_t get_new_page,
> break;
> }
> }
> - } else if (!no_split_folio_counting) {
> + } else {
> nr_failed++;
> }
>
> stats->nr_failed_pages += nr_pages + nr_retry_pages;
> - /*
> - * There might be some split folios of fail-to-migrate large
> - * folios left in split_folios list. Move them to ret_folios
> - * list so that they could be put back to the right list by
> - * the caller otherwise the folio refcnt will be leaked.
> - */
> - list_splice_init(&split_folios, ret_folios);
> /* nr_failed isn't updated for not used */
> nr_large_failed += large_retry;
> stats->nr_thp_failed += thp_retry;
> @@ -1733,7 +1720,7 @@ static int migrate_pages_batch(struct list_head *from, new_page_t get_new_page,
> if (is_large) {
> large_retry++;
> thp_retry += is_thp;
> - } else if (!no_split_folio_counting) {
> + } else {
> retry++;
> }
> nr_retry_pages += nr_pages;
> @@ -1756,7 +1743,7 @@ static int migrate_pages_batch(struct list_head *from, new_page_t get_new_page,
> if (is_large) {
> nr_large_failed++;
> stats->nr_thp_failed += is_thp;
> - } else if (!no_split_folio_counting) {
> + } else {
> nr_failed++;
> }
>
> @@ -1774,9 +1761,7 @@ static int migrate_pages_batch(struct list_head *from, new_page_t get_new_page,
> try_to_unmap_flush();
>
> retry = 1;
> - for (pass = 0;
> - pass < NR_MAX_MIGRATE_PAGES_RETRY && (retry || large_retry);
> - pass++) {
> + for (pass = 0; pass < nr_pass && (retry || large_retry); pass++) {
> retry = 0;
> large_retry = 0;
> thp_retry = 0;
> @@ -1805,7 +1790,7 @@ static int migrate_pages_batch(struct list_head *from, new_page_t get_new_page,
> if (is_large) {
> large_retry++;
> thp_retry += is_thp;
> - } else if (!no_split_folio_counting) {
> + } else {
> retry++;
> }
> nr_retry_pages += nr_pages;
> @@ -1818,7 +1803,7 @@ static int migrate_pages_batch(struct list_head *from, new_page_t get_new_page,
> if (is_large) {
> nr_large_failed++;
> stats->nr_thp_failed += is_thp;
> - } else if (!no_split_folio_counting) {
> + } else {
> nr_failed++;
> }
>
> @@ -1855,27 +1840,6 @@ static int migrate_pages_batch(struct list_head *from, new_page_t get_new_page,
> dst2 = list_next_entry(dst, lru);
> }
>
> - /*
> - * Try to migrate split folios of fail-to-migrate large folios, no
> - * nr_failed counting in this round, since all split folios of a
> - * large folio is counted as 1 failure in the first round.
> - */
> - if (rc >= 0 && !list_empty(&split_folios)) {
> - /*
> - * Move non-migrated folios (after NR_MAX_MIGRATE_PAGES_RETRY
> - * retries) to ret_folios to avoid migrating them again.
> - */
> - list_splice_init(from, ret_folios);
> - list_splice_init(&split_folios, from);
> - /*
> - * Force async mode to avoid to wait lock or bit when we have
> - * locked more than one folios.
> - */
> - mode = MIGRATE_ASYNC;
> - no_split_folio_counting = true;
> - goto retry;
> - }
> -
> return rc;
> }
>
> @@ -1914,6 +1878,7 @@ int migrate_pages(struct list_head *from, new_page_t get_new_page,
> struct folio *folio, *folio2;
> LIST_HEAD(folios);
> LIST_HEAD(ret_folios);
> + LIST_HEAD(split_folios);
> struct migrate_pages_stats stats;
>
> trace_mm_migrate_pages_start(mode, reason);
> @@ -1947,12 +1912,23 @@ int migrate_pages(struct list_head *from, new_page_t get_new_page,
> else
> list_splice_init(from, &folios);
> rc = migrate_pages_batch(&folios, get_new_page, put_new_page, private,
> - mode, reason, &ret_folios, &stats);
> + mode, reason, &ret_folios, &split_folios, &stats,
> + NR_MAX_MIGRATE_PAGES_RETRY);
> list_splice_tail_init(&folios, &ret_folios);
> if (rc < 0) {
> rc_gather = rc;
> + list_splice_tail(&split_folios, &ret_folios);
Can we still keep the original comments? Which can help to understand
the case, at least for me:)
/*
* There might be some split folios of fail-to-migrate large
* folios left in split_folios list. Move them to ret_folios
* list so that they could be put back to the right list by
* the caller otherwise the folio refcnt will be leaked.
*/
> goto out;
> }
> + if (!list_empty(&split_folios)) {
> + /*
> + * Failure isn't counted since all split folios of a large folio
> + * is counted as 1 failure already.
> + */
> + migrate_pages_batch(&split_folios, get_new_page, put_new_page, private,
> + MIGRATE_ASYNC, reason, &ret_folios, NULL, &stats, 1);
Better to copy the original comments to explain why force to
MIGRATE_ASYNC mode for split folios.
Thanks for the simplification, and please feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-01 2:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-24 14:11 [PATCH 0/3] migrate_pages: fix deadlock in batched synchronous migration Huang Ying
2023-02-24 14:11 ` [PATCH 1/3] migrate_pages: fix deadlock in batched migration Huang Ying
2023-02-28 6:13 ` Hugh Dickins
2023-02-28 7:22 ` Huang, Ying
2023-02-28 21:07 ` Hugh Dickins
2023-03-01 1:17 ` Huang, Ying
2023-02-24 14:11 ` [PATCH 2/3] migrate_pages: move split folios processing out of migrate_pages_batch() Huang Ying
2023-03-01 2:23 ` Baolin Wang [this message]
2023-03-01 6:35 ` Huang, Ying
2023-03-01 11:07 ` Baolin Wang
2023-02-24 14:11 ` [PATCH 3/3] migrate_pages: try migrate in batch asynchronously firstly Huang Ying
2023-02-28 6:36 ` Hugh Dickins
2023-02-28 7:45 ` Huang, Ying
2023-02-28 21:22 ` Hugh Dickins
2023-03-01 6:08 ` Huang, Ying
2023-03-01 6:46 ` Hugh Dickins
2023-03-01 7:10 ` Huang, Ying
2023-03-01 3:08 ` Baolin Wang
2023-03-01 6:18 ` Huang, Ying
2023-03-01 11:03 ` Baolin Wang
2023-02-26 4:55 ` [PATCH 0/3] migrate_pages: fix deadlock in batched synchronous migration Andrew Morton
2023-02-27 1:25 ` Huang, Ying
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e820f68a-d1c7-c552-b924-56d97fb0b927@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=pengfei.xu@intel.com \
--cc=shr@devkernel.io \
--cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=xhao@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox