From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, mm-commits@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] non-MM commits for 6.2-rc1
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 00:16:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e7c6b99a-743f-f40a-0b0f-31730964cb36@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221212142754.5f699c4ff515fd9d42768fb2@linux-foundation.org>
On 12/12/22 23:27, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Dec 2022 15:16:43 -0700 "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 01:44:25PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> > wifi: rt2x00: use explicitly signed or unsigned types
>>
>> Why is this part of your PULL? This was a netdev/wireless tree fix which
>> was in 6.1-rc5. Kalle wrote that he took it on 21 Oct 2022 in:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/166633563389.6242.13987912613257140089.kvalo@kernel.org/
>>
>
> Huh. I guess git quietly accepts the identical commit, so Stephen
> never told me and my test-merge-with-Linus-latest also came up clean.
> Which leaves it to me to manually handle these things, and that's
> unreliable.
>
> Is there some way of telling git to complain about identical changes
> when doing a trial merge?
Probably not exactly that, but there seems to be a way with "git cherry". Dunno
how reliable in practice, seems to be based on patch-id so probably can fail
easily if the commit or context changes slightly?
$ git checkout mm-nonmm-stable-2022-12-12
$ git cherry -v origin/master
+ eabb7f1ace53e127309407b2b5e74e8199e85270 lib/debugobjects: fix stat count and optimize debug_objects_mem_init
+ 461cc6e54ececa86007d44b0ff2521f75b872745 arc: ptrace: user_regset_copyin_ignore() always returns 0
...
+ d472cf797c4e268613dbce5ec9b95d0bcae19ecb debugfs: fix error when writing negative value to atomic_t debugfs file
- d04bb0852b8bd31c53981a04ff0132698d24523d wifi: rt2x00: use explicitly signed or unsigned types
+ 3965292ad0ca70320f1c632f2ac3b886c88b9e80 checkpatch: add check for array allocator family argument order
...
Seems to have worked in this case and flagged the wifi commit with '-'
HTH,
Vlastimil
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-12 23:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-12 21:44 Andrew Morton
2022-12-12 22:16 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-12-12 22:27 ` Andrew Morton
2022-12-12 23:16 ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2022-12-13 2:35 ` Andrew Morton
2022-12-13 2:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-12-13 2:58 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-12-12 23:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-12-13 1:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-12-13 1:39 ` pr-tracker-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e7c6b99a-743f-f40a-0b0f-31730964cb36@suse.cz \
--to=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox