* [PATCH v8 1/3] mm/rmap: remove duplicated exit code in pagewalk loop
2024-06-14 1:51 [PATCH v8 0/3] Reclaim lazyfree THP without splitting Lance Yang
@ 2024-06-14 1:51 ` Lance Yang
2024-06-14 1:51 ` [PATCH v8 2/3] mm/rmap: integrate PMD-mapped folio splitting into " Lance Yang
2024-06-14 1:51 ` [PATCH v8 3/3] mm/vmscan: avoid split lazyfree THP during shrink_folio_list() Lance Yang
2 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Lance Yang @ 2024-06-14 1:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: akpm
Cc: willy, sj, baolin.wang, maskray, ziy, ryan.roberts, david,
21cnbao, mhocko, fengwei.yin, zokeefe, shy828301, xiehuan09,
libang.li, wangkefeng.wang, songmuchun, peterx, minchan,
linux-mm, linux-kernel, Lance Yang, Barry Song
Introduce the labels walk_done and walk_abort as exit points to eliminate
duplicated exit code in the pagewalk loop.
Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Lance Yang <ioworker0@gmail.com>
---
mm/rmap.c | 40 +++++++++++++++-------------------------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
index ae250b2b4d55..2d778725e4f5 100644
--- a/mm/rmap.c
+++ b/mm/rmap.c
@@ -1681,9 +1681,7 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
/* Restore the mlock which got missed */
if (!folio_test_large(folio))
mlock_vma_folio(folio, vma);
- page_vma_mapped_walk_done(&pvmw);
- ret = false;
- break;
+ goto walk_abort;
}
pfn = pte_pfn(ptep_get(pvmw.pte));
@@ -1721,11 +1719,8 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
*/
if (!anon) {
VM_BUG_ON(!(flags & TTU_RMAP_LOCKED));
- if (!hugetlb_vma_trylock_write(vma)) {
- page_vma_mapped_walk_done(&pvmw);
- ret = false;
- break;
- }
+ if (!hugetlb_vma_trylock_write(vma))
+ goto walk_abort;
if (huge_pmd_unshare(mm, vma, address, pvmw.pte)) {
hugetlb_vma_unlock_write(vma);
flush_tlb_range(vma,
@@ -1740,8 +1735,7 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
* actual page and drop map count
* to zero.
*/
- page_vma_mapped_walk_done(&pvmw);
- break;
+ goto walk_done;
}
hugetlb_vma_unlock_write(vma);
}
@@ -1813,9 +1807,7 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
if (unlikely(folio_test_swapbacked(folio) !=
folio_test_swapcache(folio))) {
WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
- ret = false;
- page_vma_mapped_walk_done(&pvmw);
- break;
+ goto walk_abort;
}
/* MADV_FREE page check */
@@ -1854,23 +1846,17 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
*/
set_pte_at(mm, address, pvmw.pte, pteval);
folio_set_swapbacked(folio);
- ret = false;
- page_vma_mapped_walk_done(&pvmw);
- break;
+ goto walk_abort;
}
if (swap_duplicate(entry) < 0) {
set_pte_at(mm, address, pvmw.pte, pteval);
- ret = false;
- page_vma_mapped_walk_done(&pvmw);
- break;
+ goto walk_abort;
}
if (arch_unmap_one(mm, vma, address, pteval) < 0) {
swap_free(entry);
set_pte_at(mm, address, pvmw.pte, pteval);
- ret = false;
- page_vma_mapped_walk_done(&pvmw);
- break;
+ goto walk_abort;
}
/* See folio_try_share_anon_rmap(): clear PTE first. */
@@ -1878,9 +1864,7 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
folio_try_share_anon_rmap_pte(folio, subpage)) {
swap_free(entry);
set_pte_at(mm, address, pvmw.pte, pteval);
- ret = false;
- page_vma_mapped_walk_done(&pvmw);
- break;
+ goto walk_abort;
}
if (list_empty(&mm->mmlist)) {
spin_lock(&mmlist_lock);
@@ -1920,6 +1904,12 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
if (vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED)
mlock_drain_local();
folio_put(folio);
+ continue;
+walk_abort:
+ ret = false;
+walk_done:
+ page_vma_mapped_walk_done(&pvmw);
+ break;
}
mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(&range);
--
2.33.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* [PATCH v8 2/3] mm/rmap: integrate PMD-mapped folio splitting into pagewalk loop
2024-06-14 1:51 [PATCH v8 0/3] Reclaim lazyfree THP without splitting Lance Yang
2024-06-14 1:51 ` [PATCH v8 1/3] mm/rmap: remove duplicated exit code in pagewalk loop Lance Yang
@ 2024-06-14 1:51 ` Lance Yang
2024-06-14 7:34 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-06-14 14:26 ` Zi Yan
2024-06-14 1:51 ` [PATCH v8 3/3] mm/vmscan: avoid split lazyfree THP during shrink_folio_list() Lance Yang
2 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Lance Yang @ 2024-06-14 1:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: akpm
Cc: willy, sj, baolin.wang, maskray, ziy, ryan.roberts, david,
21cnbao, mhocko, fengwei.yin, zokeefe, shy828301, xiehuan09,
libang.li, wangkefeng.wang, songmuchun, peterx, minchan,
linux-mm, linux-kernel, Lance Yang
In preparation for supporting try_to_unmap_one() to unmap PMD-mapped
folios, start the pagewalk first, then call split_huge_pmd_address() to
split the folio.
Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Lance Yang <ioworker0@gmail.com>
---
include/linux/huge_mm.h | 6 ++++++
include/linux/rmap.h | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++++
mm/huge_memory.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
mm/rmap.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------
4 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/huge_mm.h b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
index 7ad41de5eaea..9f720b0731c4 100644
--- a/include/linux/huge_mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
@@ -428,6 +428,9 @@ static inline bool thp_migration_supported(void)
return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_ENABLE_THP_MIGRATION);
}
+void split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
+ pmd_t *pmd, bool freeze, struct folio *folio);
+
#else /* CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE */
static inline bool folio_test_pmd_mappable(struct folio *folio)
@@ -490,6 +493,9 @@ static inline void __split_huge_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
unsigned long address, bool freeze, struct folio *folio) {}
static inline void split_huge_pmd_address(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
unsigned long address, bool freeze, struct folio *folio) {}
+static inline void split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
+ unsigned long address, pmd_t *pmd,
+ bool freeze, struct folio *folio) {}
#define split_huge_pud(__vma, __pmd, __address) \
do { } while (0)
diff --git a/include/linux/rmap.h b/include/linux/rmap.h
index 0fd9bebce54c..d1c5e2d694b2 100644
--- a/include/linux/rmap.h
+++ b/include/linux/rmap.h
@@ -703,6 +703,30 @@ static inline void page_vma_mapped_walk_done(struct page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw)
spin_unlock(pvmw->ptl);
}
+/**
+ * page_vma_mapped_walk_restart - Restart the page table walk.
+ * @pvmw: Pointer to struct page_vma_mapped_walk.
+ *
+ * It restarts the page table walk when changes occur in the page
+ * table, such as splitting a PMD. Ensures that the PTL held during
+ * the previous walk is released and resets the state to allow for
+ * a new walk starting at the current address stored in pvmw->address.
+ */
+static inline void
+page_vma_mapped_walk_restart(struct page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw)
+{
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!pvmw->pmd && !pvmw->pte);
+
+ if (likely(pvmw->ptl))
+ spin_unlock(pvmw->ptl);
+ else
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
+
+ pvmw->ptl = NULL;
+ pvmw->pmd = NULL;
+ pvmw->pte = NULL;
+}
+
bool page_vma_mapped_walk(struct page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw);
/*
diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
index 70d20fefc6db..e766d3f3a302 100644
--- a/mm/huge_memory.c
+++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -2582,6 +2582,27 @@ static void __split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
pmd_populate(mm, pmd, pgtable);
}
+void split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
+ pmd_t *pmd, bool freeze, struct folio *folio)
+{
+ VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(folio && !folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio));
+ VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!IS_ALIGNED(address, HPAGE_PMD_SIZE));
+ VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(folio && !folio_test_locked(folio));
+ VM_BUG_ON(freeze && !folio);
+
+ /*
+ * When the caller requests to set up a migration entry, we
+ * require a folio to check the PMD against. Otherwise, there
+ * is a risk of replacing the wrong folio.
+ */
+ if (pmd_trans_huge(*pmd) || pmd_devmap(*pmd) ||
+ is_pmd_migration_entry(*pmd)) {
+ if (folio && folio != pmd_folio(*pmd))
+ return;
+ __split_huge_pmd_locked(vma, pmd, address, freeze);
+ }
+}
+
void __split_huge_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
unsigned long address, bool freeze, struct folio *folio)
{
@@ -2593,26 +2614,7 @@ void __split_huge_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
(address & HPAGE_PMD_MASK) + HPAGE_PMD_SIZE);
mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(&range);
ptl = pmd_lock(vma->vm_mm, pmd);
-
- /*
- * If caller asks to setup a migration entry, we need a folio to check
- * pmd against. Otherwise we can end up replacing wrong folio.
- */
- VM_BUG_ON(freeze && !folio);
- VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(folio && !folio_test_locked(folio));
-
- if (pmd_trans_huge(*pmd) || pmd_devmap(*pmd) ||
- is_pmd_migration_entry(*pmd)) {
- /*
- * It's safe to call pmd_page when folio is set because it's
- * guaranteed that pmd is present.
- */
- if (folio && folio != pmd_folio(*pmd))
- goto out;
- __split_huge_pmd_locked(vma, pmd, range.start, freeze);
- }
-
-out:
+ split_huge_pmd_locked(vma, range.start, pmd, freeze, folio);
spin_unlock(ptl);
mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(&range);
}
diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
index 2d778725e4f5..dacf24bc82f0 100644
--- a/mm/rmap.c
+++ b/mm/rmap.c
@@ -1642,9 +1642,6 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
if (flags & TTU_SYNC)
pvmw.flags = PVMW_SYNC;
- if (flags & TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD)
- split_huge_pmd_address(vma, address, false, folio);
-
/*
* For THP, we have to assume the worse case ie pmd for invalidation.
* For hugetlb, it could be much worse if we need to do pud
@@ -1670,9 +1667,6 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(&range);
while (page_vma_mapped_walk(&pvmw)) {
- /* Unexpected PMD-mapped THP? */
- VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!pvmw.pte, folio);
-
/*
* If the folio is in an mlock()d vma, we must not swap it out.
*/
@@ -1684,6 +1678,21 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
goto walk_abort;
}
+ if (!pvmw.pte && (flags & TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD)) {
+ /*
+ * We temporarily have to drop the PTL and start once
+ * again from that now-PTE-mapped page table.
+ */
+ split_huge_pmd_locked(vma, pvmw.address, pvmw.pmd,
+ false, folio);
+ flags &= ~TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD;
+ page_vma_mapped_walk_restart(&pvmw);
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ /* Unexpected PMD-mapped THP? */
+ VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!pvmw.pte, folio);
+
pfn = pte_pfn(ptep_get(pvmw.pte));
subpage = folio_page(folio, pfn - folio_pfn(folio));
address = pvmw.address;
--
2.33.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v8 2/3] mm/rmap: integrate PMD-mapped folio splitting into pagewalk loop
2024-06-14 1:51 ` [PATCH v8 2/3] mm/rmap: integrate PMD-mapped folio splitting into " Lance Yang
@ 2024-06-14 7:34 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-06-14 7:46 ` Lance Yang
2024-06-14 14:26 ` Zi Yan
1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: David Hildenbrand @ 2024-06-14 7:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lance Yang, akpm
Cc: willy, sj, baolin.wang, maskray, ziy, ryan.roberts, 21cnbao,
mhocko, fengwei.yin, zokeefe, shy828301, xiehuan09, libang.li,
wangkefeng.wang, songmuchun, peterx, minchan, linux-mm,
linux-kernel
On 14.06.24 03:51, Lance Yang wrote:
> In preparation for supporting try_to_unmap_one() to unmap PMD-mapped
> folios, start the pagewalk first, then call split_huge_pmd_address() to
> split the folio.
>
> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Suggested-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lance Yang <ioworker0@gmail.com>
> ---
Would have converted that VM_BUG_ON to a VM_WARN_ON_ONCE, but it's just
moving code, so no big deal.
Thanks!
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v8 2/3] mm/rmap: integrate PMD-mapped folio splitting into pagewalk loop
2024-06-14 7:34 ` David Hildenbrand
@ 2024-06-14 7:46 ` Lance Yang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Lance Yang @ 2024-06-14 7:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Hildenbrand
Cc: akpm, willy, sj, baolin.wang, maskray, ziy, ryan.roberts,
21cnbao, mhocko, fengwei.yin, zokeefe, shy828301, xiehuan09,
libang.li, wangkefeng.wang, songmuchun, peterx, minchan,
linux-mm, linux-kernel
On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 3:34 PM David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 14.06.24 03:51, Lance Yang wrote:
> > In preparation for supporting try_to_unmap_one() to unmap PMD-mapped
> > folios, start the pagewalk first, then call split_huge_pmd_address() to
> > split the folio.
> >
> > Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> > Suggested-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Lance Yang <ioworker0@gmail.com>
> > ---
>
> Would have converted that VM_BUG_ON to a VM_WARN_ON_ONCE, but it's just
> moving code, so no big deal.
OK, let’s leave it as is for now ;)
>
> Thanks!
>
> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Thanks for taking time to review!
Lance
>
> --
> Cheers,
>
> David / dhildenb
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v8 2/3] mm/rmap: integrate PMD-mapped folio splitting into pagewalk loop
2024-06-14 1:51 ` [PATCH v8 2/3] mm/rmap: integrate PMD-mapped folio splitting into " Lance Yang
2024-06-14 7:34 ` David Hildenbrand
@ 2024-06-14 14:26 ` Zi Yan
2024-06-14 14:41 ` Lance Yang
1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Zi Yan @ 2024-06-14 14:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lance Yang
Cc: akpm, willy, sj, baolin.wang, maskray, ryan.roberts, david,
21cnbao, mhocko, fengwei.yin, zokeefe, shy828301, xiehuan09,
libang.li, wangkefeng.wang, songmuchun, peterx, minchan,
linux-mm, linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 727 bytes --]
On 13 Jun 2024, at 21:51, Lance Yang wrote:
> In preparation for supporting try_to_unmap_one() to unmap PMD-mapped
> folios, start the pagewalk first, then call split_huge_pmd_address() to
> split the folio.
>
> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Suggested-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lance Yang <ioworker0@gmail.com>
> ---
> include/linux/huge_mm.h | 6 ++++++
> include/linux/rmap.h | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> mm/huge_memory.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> mm/rmap.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------
> 4 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
Thanks.
Acked-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
--
Best Regards,
Yan, Zi
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 854 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v8 2/3] mm/rmap: integrate PMD-mapped folio splitting into pagewalk loop
2024-06-14 14:26 ` Zi Yan
@ 2024-06-14 14:41 ` Lance Yang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Lance Yang @ 2024-06-14 14:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zi Yan
Cc: akpm, willy, sj, baolin.wang, maskray, ryan.roberts, david,
21cnbao, mhocko, fengwei.yin, zokeefe, shy828301, xiehuan09,
libang.li, wangkefeng.wang, songmuchun, peterx, minchan,
linux-mm, linux-kernel
On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 10:26 PM Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> wrote:
>
> On 13 Jun 2024, at 21:51, Lance Yang wrote:
>
> > In preparation for supporting try_to_unmap_one() to unmap PMD-mapped
> > folios, start the pagewalk first, then call split_huge_pmd_address() to
> > split the folio.
> >
> > Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> > Suggested-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Lance Yang <ioworker0@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > include/linux/huge_mm.h | 6 ++++++
> > include/linux/rmap.h | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> > mm/huge_memory.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> > mm/rmap.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------
> > 4 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> Thanks.
>
> Acked-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Thanks for taking time to review!
Lance
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Yan, Zi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v8 3/3] mm/vmscan: avoid split lazyfree THP during shrink_folio_list()
2024-06-14 1:51 [PATCH v8 0/3] Reclaim lazyfree THP without splitting Lance Yang
2024-06-14 1:51 ` [PATCH v8 1/3] mm/rmap: remove duplicated exit code in pagewalk loop Lance Yang
2024-06-14 1:51 ` [PATCH v8 2/3] mm/rmap: integrate PMD-mapped folio splitting into " Lance Yang
@ 2024-06-14 1:51 ` Lance Yang
2024-06-17 18:04 ` David Hildenbrand
2 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Lance Yang @ 2024-06-14 1:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: akpm
Cc: willy, sj, baolin.wang, maskray, ziy, ryan.roberts, david,
21cnbao, mhocko, fengwei.yin, zokeefe, shy828301, xiehuan09,
libang.li, wangkefeng.wang, songmuchun, peterx, minchan,
linux-mm, linux-kernel, Lance Yang
When the user no longer requires the pages, they would use
madvise(MADV_FREE) to mark the pages as lazy free. Subsequently, they
typically would not re-write to that memory again.
During memory reclaim, if we detect that the large folio and its PMD are
both still marked as clean and there are no unexpected references
(such as GUP), so we can just discard the memory lazily, improving the
efficiency of memory reclamation in this case.
On an Intel i5 CPU, reclaiming 1GiB of lazyfree THPs using
mem_cgroup_force_empty() results in the following runtimes in seconds
(shorter is better):
--------------------------------------------
| Old | New | Change |
--------------------------------------------
| 0.683426 | 0.049197 | -92.80% |
--------------------------------------------
Suggested-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Lance Yang <ioworker0@gmail.com>
---
include/linux/huge_mm.h | 9 +++++
mm/huge_memory.c | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
mm/rmap.c | 27 +++++++++------
3 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/huge_mm.h b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
index 9f720b0731c4..212cca384d7e 100644
--- a/include/linux/huge_mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
@@ -430,6 +430,8 @@ static inline bool thp_migration_supported(void)
void split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
pmd_t *pmd, bool freeze, struct folio *folio);
+bool unmap_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
+ pmd_t *pmdp, struct folio *folio);
#else /* CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE */
@@ -497,6 +499,13 @@ static inline void split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
unsigned long address, pmd_t *pmd,
bool freeze, struct folio *folio) {}
+static inline bool unmap_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
+ unsigned long addr, pmd_t *pmdp,
+ struct folio *folio)
+{
+ return false;
+}
+
#define split_huge_pud(__vma, __pmd, __address) \
do { } while (0)
diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
index e766d3f3a302..425374ae06ed 100644
--- a/mm/huge_memory.c
+++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -2688,6 +2688,82 @@ static void unmap_folio(struct folio *folio)
try_to_unmap_flush();
}
+static bool __discard_anon_folio_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
+ unsigned long addr, pmd_t *pmdp,
+ struct folio *folio)
+{
+ VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO(folio_test_swapbacked(folio), folio);
+ VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_anon(folio), folio);
+
+ struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm;
+ int ref_count, map_count;
+ pmd_t orig_pmd = *pmdp;
+ struct page *page;
+
+ if (unlikely(!pmd_present(orig_pmd) || !pmd_trans_huge(orig_pmd)))
+ return false;
+
+ page = pmd_page(orig_pmd);
+ if (unlikely(page_folio(page) != folio))
+ return false;
+
+ if (folio_test_dirty(folio) || pmd_dirty(orig_pmd))
+ return false;
+
+ orig_pmd = pmdp_huge_clear_flush(vma, addr, pmdp);
+
+ /*
+ * Syncing against concurrent GUP-fast:
+ * - clear PMD; barrier; read refcount
+ * - inc refcount; barrier; read PMD
+ */
+ smp_mb();
+
+ ref_count = folio_ref_count(folio);
+ map_count = folio_mapcount(folio);
+
+ /*
+ * Order reads for folio refcount and dirty flag
+ * (see comments in __remove_mapping()).
+ */
+ smp_rmb();
+
+ /*
+ * If the folio or its PMD is redirtied at this point, or if there
+ * are unexpected references, we will give up to discard this folio
+ * and remap it.
+ *
+ * The only folio refs must be one from isolation plus the rmap(s).
+ */
+ if (folio_test_dirty(folio) || pmd_dirty(orig_pmd) ||
+ ref_count != map_count + 1) {
+ set_pmd_at(mm, addr, pmdp, orig_pmd);
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ folio_remove_rmap_pmd(folio, page, vma);
+ zap_deposited_table(mm, pmdp);
+ add_mm_counter(mm, MM_ANONPAGES, -HPAGE_PMD_NR);
+ if (vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED)
+ mlock_drain_local();
+ folio_put(folio);
+
+ return true;
+}
+
+bool unmap_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
+ pmd_t *pmdp, struct folio *folio)
+{
+ VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio), folio);
+ VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_locked(folio), folio);
+ VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!IS_ALIGNED(addr, HPAGE_PMD_SIZE));
+
+ if (folio_test_anon(folio) && !folio_test_swapbacked(folio))
+ return __discard_anon_folio_pmd_locked(vma, addr, pmdp, folio);
+
+ return false;
+}
+
static void remap_page(struct folio *folio, unsigned long nr)
{
int i = 0;
diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
index dacf24bc82f0..7d97806f74cd 100644
--- a/mm/rmap.c
+++ b/mm/rmap.c
@@ -1678,16 +1678,23 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
goto walk_abort;
}
- if (!pvmw.pte && (flags & TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD)) {
- /*
- * We temporarily have to drop the PTL and start once
- * again from that now-PTE-mapped page table.
- */
- split_huge_pmd_locked(vma, pvmw.address, pvmw.pmd,
- false, folio);
- flags &= ~TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD;
- page_vma_mapped_walk_restart(&pvmw);
- continue;
+ if (!pvmw.pte) {
+ if (unmap_huge_pmd_locked(vma, pvmw.address, pvmw.pmd,
+ folio))
+ goto walk_done;
+
+ if (flags & TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD) {
+ /*
+ * We temporarily have to drop the PTL and start
+ * once again from that now-PTE-mapped page
+ * table.
+ */
+ split_huge_pmd_locked(vma, pvmw.address,
+ pvmw.pmd, false, folio);
+ flags &= ~TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD;
+ page_vma_mapped_walk_restart(&pvmw);
+ continue;
+ }
}
/* Unexpected PMD-mapped THP? */
--
2.33.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v8 3/3] mm/vmscan: avoid split lazyfree THP during shrink_folio_list()
2024-06-14 1:51 ` [PATCH v8 3/3] mm/vmscan: avoid split lazyfree THP during shrink_folio_list() Lance Yang
@ 2024-06-17 18:04 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-06-18 1:56 ` Lance Yang
2024-06-22 10:00 ` Lance Yang
0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: David Hildenbrand @ 2024-06-17 18:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lance Yang, akpm
Cc: willy, sj, baolin.wang, maskray, ziy, ryan.roberts, 21cnbao,
mhocko, fengwei.yin, zokeefe, shy828301, xiehuan09, libang.li,
wangkefeng.wang, songmuchun, peterx, minchan, linux-mm,
linux-kernel
Sorry for taking so long to review ... getting there. Mostly nits.
> @@ -497,6 +499,13 @@ static inline void split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> unsigned long address, pmd_t *pmd,
> bool freeze, struct folio *folio) {}
>
> +static inline bool unmap_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> + unsigned long addr, pmd_t *pmdp,
> + struct folio *folio)
> +{
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> #define split_huge_pud(__vma, __pmd, __address) \
> do { } while (0)
>
> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> index e766d3f3a302..425374ae06ed 100644
> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> @@ -2688,6 +2688,82 @@ static void unmap_folio(struct folio *folio)
> try_to_unmap_flush();
> }
>
> +static bool __discard_anon_folio_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> + unsigned long addr, pmd_t *pmdp,
> + struct folio *folio)
> +{
> + VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO(folio_test_swapbacked(folio), folio);
> + VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_anon(folio), folio);
I would drop these (that's exactly what the single caller checks). In
any case don't place them above the variable declaration ;)
> +
> + struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm;
> + int ref_count, map_count;
> + pmd_t orig_pmd = *pmdp;
> + struct page *page;
> +
> + if (unlikely(!pmd_present(orig_pmd) || !pmd_trans_huge(orig_pmd)))
> + return false;
> +
> + page = pmd_page(orig_pmd);
> + if (unlikely(page_folio(page) != folio))
> + return false;
I'm curious, how could that happen? And how could it happen that we have
!pmd_trans_huge() ? Didn't rmap walking code make sure that this PMD
maps the folio already, and we are holding the PTL?
> +
> + if (folio_test_dirty(folio) || pmd_dirty(orig_pmd))
> + return false;
> +
> + orig_pmd = pmdp_huge_clear_flush(vma, addr, pmdp);
> +
> + /*
> + * Syncing against concurrent GUP-fast:
> + * - clear PMD; barrier; read refcount
> + * - inc refcount; barrier; read PMD
> + */
> + smp_mb();
> +
> + ref_count = folio_ref_count(folio);
> + map_count = folio_mapcount(folio);
> +
> + /*
> + * Order reads for folio refcount and dirty flag
> + * (see comments in __remove_mapping()).
> + */
> + smp_rmb();
> +
> + /*
> + * If the folio or its PMD is redirtied at this point, or if there
> + * are unexpected references, we will give up to discard this folio
> + * and remap it.
> + *
> + * The only folio refs must be one from isolation plus the rmap(s).
> + */
> + if (folio_test_dirty(folio) || pmd_dirty(orig_pmd) ||
> + ref_count != map_count + 1) {
> + set_pmd_at(mm, addr, pmdp, orig_pmd);
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + folio_remove_rmap_pmd(folio, page, vma);
> + zap_deposited_table(mm, pmdp);
> + add_mm_counter(mm, MM_ANONPAGES, -HPAGE_PMD_NR);
> + if (vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED)
> + mlock_drain_local();
> + folio_put(folio);
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +bool unmap_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
> + pmd_t *pmdp, struct folio *folio)
> +{
> + VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio), folio);
> + VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_locked(folio), folio);
> + VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!IS_ALIGNED(addr, HPAGE_PMD_SIZE));
> +
> + if (folio_test_anon(folio) && !folio_test_swapbacked(folio))
> + return __discard_anon_folio_pmd_locked(vma, addr, pmdp, folio);
> +
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> static void remap_page(struct folio *folio, unsigned long nr)
> {
> int i = 0;
> diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
> index dacf24bc82f0..7d97806f74cd 100644
> --- a/mm/rmap.c
> +++ b/mm/rmap.c
> @@ -1678,16 +1678,23 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> goto walk_abort;
> }
>
> - if (!pvmw.pte && (flags & TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD)) {
> - /*
> - * We temporarily have to drop the PTL and start once
> - * again from that now-PTE-mapped page table.
> - */
> - split_huge_pmd_locked(vma, pvmw.address, pvmw.pmd,
> - false, folio);
> - flags &= ~TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD;
> - page_vma_mapped_walk_restart(&pvmw);
> - continue;
> + if (!pvmw.pte) {
> + if (unmap_huge_pmd_locked(vma, pvmw.address, pvmw.pmd,
> + folio))
> + goto walk_done;
> +
> + if (flags & TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD) {
> + /*
> + * We temporarily have to drop the PTL and start
> + * once again from that now-PTE-mapped page
> + * table.
Nit: it's not a PTE-mapped page table.
Maybe
"... restart so we can process the PTE-mapped THP."
> }
>
> /* Unexpected PMD-mapped THP? */
Nothing else jumped at me :)
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v8 3/3] mm/vmscan: avoid split lazyfree THP during shrink_folio_list()
2024-06-17 18:04 ` David Hildenbrand
@ 2024-06-18 1:56 ` Lance Yang
2024-06-22 10:00 ` Lance Yang
1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Lance Yang @ 2024-06-18 1:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Hildenbrand
Cc: akpm, willy, sj, baolin.wang, maskray, ziy, ryan.roberts,
21cnbao, mhocko, fengwei.yin, zokeefe, shy828301, xiehuan09,
libang.li, wangkefeng.wang, songmuchun, peterx, minchan,
linux-mm, linux-kernel
On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 2:04 AM David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Sorry for taking so long to review ... getting there. Mostly nits.
No worries at all :)
Thanks for taking time to review!
>
> > @@ -497,6 +499,13 @@ static inline void split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > unsigned long address, pmd_t *pmd,
> > bool freeze, struct folio *folio) {}
> >
> > +static inline bool unmap_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > + unsigned long addr, pmd_t *pmdp,
> > + struct folio *folio)
> > +{
> > + return false;
> > +}
> > +
> > #define split_huge_pud(__vma, __pmd, __address) \
> > do { } while (0)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> > index e766d3f3a302..425374ae06ed 100644
> > --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> > +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> > @@ -2688,6 +2688,82 @@ static void unmap_folio(struct folio *folio)
> > try_to_unmap_flush();
> > }
> >
> > +static bool __discard_anon_folio_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > + unsigned long addr, pmd_t *pmdp,
> > + struct folio *folio)
> > +{
> > + VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO(folio_test_swapbacked(folio), folio);
> > + VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_anon(folio), folio);
>
> I would drop these (that's exactly what the single caller checks). In
Agreed. I will drop these.
> any case don't place them above the variable declaration ;)
Yep, I see.
>
> > +
> > + struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm;
> > + int ref_count, map_count;
> > + pmd_t orig_pmd = *pmdp;
> > + struct page *page;
> > +
> > + if (unlikely(!pmd_present(orig_pmd) || !pmd_trans_huge(orig_pmd)))
> > + return false;
> > +
> > + page = pmd_page(orig_pmd);
> > + if (unlikely(page_folio(page) != folio))
> > + return false;
>
> I'm curious, how could that happen? And how could it happen that we have
> !pmd_trans_huge() ? Didn't rmap walking code make sure that this PMD
> maps the folio already, and we are holding the PTL?
Makes sense to me. I was adding these just in case, but it's probably too much.
Let's drop them ;)
>
> > +
> > + if (folio_test_dirty(folio) || pmd_dirty(orig_pmd))
> > + return false;
> > +
> > + orig_pmd = pmdp_huge_clear_flush(vma, addr, pmdp);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Syncing against concurrent GUP-fast:
> > + * - clear PMD; barrier; read refcount
> > + * - inc refcount; barrier; read PMD
> > + */
> > + smp_mb();
> > +
> > + ref_count = folio_ref_count(folio);
> > + map_count = folio_mapcount(folio);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Order reads for folio refcount and dirty flag
> > + * (see comments in __remove_mapping()).
> > + */
> > + smp_rmb();
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * If the folio or its PMD is redirtied at this point, or if there
> > + * are unexpected references, we will give up to discard this folio
> > + * and remap it.
> > + *
> > + * The only folio refs must be one from isolation plus the rmap(s).
> > + */
> > + if (folio_test_dirty(folio) || pmd_dirty(orig_pmd) ||
> > + ref_count != map_count + 1) {
> > + set_pmd_at(mm, addr, pmdp, orig_pmd);
> > + return false;
> > + }
> > +
> > + folio_remove_rmap_pmd(folio, page, vma);
> > + zap_deposited_table(mm, pmdp);
> > + add_mm_counter(mm, MM_ANONPAGES, -HPAGE_PMD_NR);
> > + if (vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED)
> > + mlock_drain_local();
> > + folio_put(folio);
> > +
> > + return true;
> > +}
> > +
> > +bool unmap_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
> > + pmd_t *pmdp, struct folio *folio)
> > +{
> > + VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio), folio);
> > + VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_locked(folio), folio);
> > + VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!IS_ALIGNED(addr, HPAGE_PMD_SIZE));
> > +
> > + if (folio_test_anon(folio) && !folio_test_swapbacked(folio))
> > + return __discard_anon_folio_pmd_locked(vma, addr, pmdp, folio);
> > +
> > + return false;
> > +}
> > +
> > static void remap_page(struct folio *folio, unsigned long nr)
> > {
> > int i = 0;
> > diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
> > index dacf24bc82f0..7d97806f74cd 100644
> > --- a/mm/rmap.c
> > +++ b/mm/rmap.c
> > @@ -1678,16 +1678,23 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > goto walk_abort;
> > }
> >
> > - if (!pvmw.pte && (flags & TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD)) {
> > - /*
> > - * We temporarily have to drop the PTL and start once
> > - * again from that now-PTE-mapped page table.
> > - */
> > - split_huge_pmd_locked(vma, pvmw.address, pvmw.pmd,
> > - false, folio);
> > - flags &= ~TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD;
> > - page_vma_mapped_walk_restart(&pvmw);
> > - continue;
> > + if (!pvmw.pte) {
> > + if (unmap_huge_pmd_locked(vma, pvmw.address, pvmw.pmd,
> > + folio))
> > + goto walk_done;
> > +
> > + if (flags & TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD) {
> > + /*
> > + * We temporarily have to drop the PTL and start
> > + * once again from that now-PTE-mapped page
> > + * table.
>
> Nit: it's not a PTE-mapped page table.
>
> Maybe
>
> "... restart so we can process the PTE-mapped THP."
Nice. Will adjust as you suggested.
>
>
>
> > }
> >
> > /* Unexpected PMD-mapped THP? */
>
> Nothing else jumped at me :)
Thanks again for your time!
Lance
>
> --
> Cheers,
>
> David / dhildenb
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v8 3/3] mm/vmscan: avoid split lazyfree THP during shrink_folio_list()
2024-06-17 18:04 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-06-18 1:56 ` Lance Yang
@ 2024-06-22 10:00 ` Lance Yang
1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Lance Yang @ 2024-06-22 10:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: david, akpm
Cc: 21cnbao, baolin.wang, fengwei.yin, ioworker0, libang.li,
linux-kernel, linux-mm, maskray, mhocko, minchan, peterx,
ryan.roberts, shy828301, sj, songmuchun, wangkefeng.wang, willy,
xiehuan09, ziy, zokeefe
Hi Andrew,
I made some minor changes suggested by David[1]. Could you please fold the
following changes into this patch?
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/e7c0aff1-b690-4926-9a34-4e32c9f3faaa@redhat.com/
diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
index 4b2817bb2c7d..0cb52ae29259 100644
--- a/mm/huge_memory.c
+++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -2693,21 +2693,11 @@ static bool __discard_anon_folio_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
unsigned long addr, pmd_t *pmdp,
struct folio *folio)
{
- VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO(folio_test_swapbacked(folio), folio);
- VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_anon(folio), folio);
-
struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm;
int ref_count, map_count;
pmd_t orig_pmd = *pmdp;
struct page *page;
- if (unlikely(!pmd_present(orig_pmd) || !pmd_trans_huge(orig_pmd)))
- return false;
-
- page = pmd_page(orig_pmd);
- if (unlikely(page_folio(page) != folio))
- return false;
-
if (folio_test_dirty(folio) || pmd_dirty(orig_pmd))
return false;
diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
index df1a43295c85..b358501fb7e8 100644
--- a/mm/rmap.c
+++ b/mm/rmap.c
@@ -1678,9 +1678,8 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
if (flags & TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD) {
/*
- * We temporarily have to drop the PTL and start
- * once again from that now-PTE-mapped page
- * table.
+ * We temporarily have to drop the PTL and
+ * restart so we can process the PTE-mapped THP.
*/
split_huge_pmd_locked(vma, pvmw.address,
pvmw.pmd, false, folio);
--
Thanks,
Lance
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread