linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: maobibo <maobibo@loongson.cn>
To: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>,
	loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] LoongArch: Add barrier between set_pte and memory access
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 10:53:35 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e7c06bf4-897a-7060-61f9-97435d2af16e@loongson.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAhV-H6nkiw_eOS3jFdojJsCJOA2yiprQmaT5c=SnPhJTOyKkQ@mail.gmail.com>



On 2024/10/14 下午2:31, Huacai Chen wrote:
> Hi, Bibo,
> 
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 11:59 AM Bibo Mao <maobibo@loongson.cn> wrote:
>>
>> It is possible to return a spurious fault if memory is accessed
>> right after the pte is set. For user address space, pte is set
>> in kernel space and memory is accessed in user space, there is
>> long time for synchronization, no barrier needed. However for
>> kernel address space, it is possible that memory is accessed
>> right after the pte is set.
>>
>> Here flush_cache_vmap/flush_cache_vmap_early is used for
>> synchronization.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bibo Mao <maobibo@loongson.cn>
>> ---
>>   arch/loongarch/include/asm/cacheflush.h | 14 +++++++++++++-
>>   1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/cacheflush.h b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/cacheflush.h
>> index f8754d08a31a..53be231319ef 100644
>> --- a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/cacheflush.h
>> +++ b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/cacheflush.h
>> @@ -42,12 +42,24 @@ void local_flush_icache_range(unsigned long start, unsigned long end);
>>   #define flush_cache_dup_mm(mm)                         do { } while (0)
>>   #define flush_cache_range(vma, start, end)             do { } while (0)
>>   #define flush_cache_page(vma, vmaddr, pfn)             do { } while (0)
>> -#define flush_cache_vmap(start, end)                   do { } while (0)
>>   #define flush_cache_vunmap(start, end)                 do { } while (0)
>>   #define flush_icache_user_page(vma, page, addr, len)   do { } while (0)
>>   #define flush_dcache_mmap_lock(mapping)                        do { } while (0)
>>   #define flush_dcache_mmap_unlock(mapping)              do { } while (0)
>>
>> +/*
>> + * It is possible for a kernel virtual mapping access to return a spurious
>> + * fault if it's accessed right after the pte is set. The page fault handler
>> + * does not expect this type of fault. flush_cache_vmap is not exactly the
>> + * right place to put this, but it seems to work well enough.
>> + */
>> +static inline void flush_cache_vmap(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
>> +{
>> +       smp_mb();
>> +}
>> +#define flush_cache_vmap flush_cache_vmap
>> +#define flush_cache_vmap_early flush_cache_vmap
>  From the history of flush_cache_vmap_early(), It seems only archs with
> "virtual cache" (VIVT or VIPT) need this API, so LoongArch can be a
> no-op here.

Here is usage about flush_cache_vmap_early in file linux/mm/percpu.c,
map the page and access it immediately. Do you think it should be noop 
on LoongArch.

rc = __pcpu_map_pages(unit_addr, &pages[unit * unit_pages],
                                      unit_pages);
if (rc < 0)
     panic("failed to map percpu area, err=%d\n", rc);
     flush_cache_vmap_early(unit_addr, unit_addr + ai->unit_size);
     /* copy static data */
     memcpy((void *)unit_addr, __per_cpu_load, ai->static_size);
}


> 
> And I still think flush_cache_vunmap() should be a smp_mb(). A
> smp_mb() in flush_cache_vmap() prevents subsequent accesses be
> reordered before pte_set(), and a smp_mb() in flush_cache_vunmap()
smp_mb() in flush_cache_vmap() does not prevent reorder. It is to flush 
pipeline and let page table walker HW sync with data cache.

For the following example.
   rb = vmap(pages, nr_meta_pages + 2 * nr_data_pages,
                   VM_MAP | VM_USERMAP, PAGE_KERNEL);
   if (rb) {
<<<<<<<<<<< * the sentence if (rb) can prevent reorder. Otherwise with 
any API kmalloc/vmap/vmalloc and subsequent memory access, there will be 
reorder issu. *
       kmemleak_not_leak(pages);
       rb->pages = pages;
       rb->nr_pages = nr_pages;
       return rb;
   }

> prevents preceding accesses be reordered after pte_clear(). This
Can you give an example about such usage about flush_cache_vunmap()? and 
we can continue to talk about it, else it is just guessing.

Regards
Bibo Mao
> potential problem may not be seen from experiment, but it is needed in
> theory.
> 
> Huacai
> 
>> +
>>   #define cache_op(op, addr)                                             \
>>          __asm__ __volatile__(                                           \
>>          "       cacop   %0, %1                                  \n"     \
>> --
>> 2.39.3
>>
>>



  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-15  2:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-14  3:58 [PATCH v2 0/3] LoongArch: Fix vmalloc test issue Bibo Mao
2024-10-14  3:58 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] LoongArch: Set initial pte entry with PAGE_GLOBAL for kernel space Bibo Mao
2024-10-18  3:14   ` Huacai Chen
2024-10-18  3:44     ` maobibo
2024-10-18  4:11       ` Huacai Chen
2024-10-18  4:16         ` maobibo
2024-10-18  4:23           ` Huacai Chen
2024-10-18  6:23             ` maobibo
2024-10-18  6:32               ` Huacai Chen
2024-10-21  1:22                 ` maobibo
2024-10-21 10:13                   ` Huacai Chen
2024-10-22  1:39                     ` maobibo
2024-10-22  1:56                       ` Huacai Chen
2024-10-14  3:58 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] LoongArch: Add barrier between set_pte and memory access Bibo Mao
2024-10-14  6:31   ` Huacai Chen
2024-10-15  2:53     ` maobibo [this message]
2024-10-15 12:27       ` Huacai Chen
2024-10-16  6:09         ` maobibo
2024-10-16  7:30           ` Huacai Chen
2024-10-14  3:58 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] LoongArch: Remove pte buddy set with set_pte and pte_clear function Bibo Mao
2024-10-14  6:33   ` Huacai Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e7c06bf4-897a-7060-61f9-97435d2af16e@loongson.cn \
    --to=maobibo@loongson.cn \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox