From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf1-f199.google.com (mail-pf1-f199.google.com [209.85.210.199]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2C266B0005 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2018 01:31:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pf1-f199.google.com with SMTP id w14-v6so6305210pfn.13 for ; Sat, 04 Aug 2018 22:31:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from EUR04-VI1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr80132.outbound.protection.outlook.com. [40.107.8.132]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z62-v6si7609979pgz.640.2018.08.04.22.30.58 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 04 Aug 2018 22:30:58 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Use special value SHRINKER_REGISTERING instead list_empty() check References: <153331055842.22632.9290331685041037871.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20180803155120.0d65511b46c100565b4f8a2c@linux-foundation.org> <843169c5-a47a-e6cd-7412-611e72eb20ba@virtuozzo.com> <20180805000305.GC3183@bombadil.infradead.org> From: Kirill Tkhai Message-ID: Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2018 08:30:43 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180805000305.GC3183@bombadil.infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Andrew Morton , vdavydov.dev@gmail.com, mhocko@suse.com, aryabinin@virtuozzo.com, ying.huang@intel.com, penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp, shakeelb@google.com, jbacik@fb.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05.08.2018 03:03, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Sat, Aug 04, 2018 at 09:42:05PM +0300, Kirill Tkhai wrote: >> This is exactly the thing the patch makes. Instead of inserting a shrinker pointer >> to idr, it inserts a fake value SHRINKER_REGISTERING there. The patch makes impossible >> to dereference a shrinker unless it's completely registered. > > - id = idr_alloc(&shrinker_idr, shrinker, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL); > + id = idr_alloc(&shrinker_idr, SHRINKER_REGISTERING, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL); > > Instead: > > + id = idr_alloc(&shrinker_idr, NULL, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL); > > ... and the rest of your patch becomes even simpler. The patch, we are discussing at the moment, does *exactly* this: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/8/3/588 It looks like you missed this hunk in the patch.