linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
To: Zhenguo Yao <yaozhenguo1@gmail.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Commit 'hugetlbfs: extend the definition of hugepages parameter to support node allocation' breaks old numa less syntax of reserving hugepages on boot.
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2021 13:18:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e52068a6e98031a386b5052a166a55c94fe940f6.camel@redhat.com> (raw)


dmesg prints this:

HugeTLB: allocating 64 of page size 1.00 GiB failed.  Only allocated 0 hugepages

Huge pages were allocated on kernel command line (1/2 of 128GB system):

'default_hugepagesz=1G hugepagesz=1G hugepages=64'

This is 3970X and no real support/need for NUMA, thus only fake NUMA node 0 is present.

Reverting the commit helps.

New syntax also works ( hugepages=0:64 )

I can test any patches for this bug.


Also unrelated, is there any progress on allocating 1GB pages on demand so that I could
allocate them only when I run a VM?

i don't mind having these pages to be marked as to be used for userspace only,
since as far as I remember its the kernel usage that makes some page unmoveable.

Last time (many years ago) I tried to create a zone with only userspace pages
(I don't remember what options I used) but it didn't work.

Is there a way to debug what is causing unmoveable pages and doesn't let
/proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages work (I tried it today and as usual the number
it can allocate steadly decreases over time).

Thanks,
Best regards,
	Maxim Levitsky





             reply	other threads:[~2021-11-28 11:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-28 11:18 Maxim Levitsky [this message]
2021-11-29  4:31 ` Mike Kravetz
2021-11-29  8:17   ` Zhenguo Yao
2021-11-29 10:39   ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-11-30  7:49     ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-11-29 12:26   ` Zhenguo Yao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e52068a6e98031a386b5052a166a55c94fe940f6.camel@redhat.com \
    --to=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
    --cc=yaozhenguo1@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox