linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] mm/pageblock: mitigation cmpxchg false sharing in pageblock flags
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2020 11:00:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e4c95bf8-508a-3743-4547-1782938670a0@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7813624a-d8af-f09f-d8c3-0d2a01fe5dd3@linux.alibaba.com>

On 9/3/20 10:40 AM, Alex Shi wrote:
> 
> 
> 在 2020/9/3 下午4:32, Alex Shi 写道:
>>>
>> I have run thpscale with 'always' defrag setting of THP. The Amean stddev is much
>> larger than a very little average run time reducing.
>> 
>> But the left patch 4 could show the cmpxchg retry reduce from thousands to hundreds
>> or less.
>> 
>> Subject: [PATCH v4 4/4] add cmpxchg tracing
> 
> 
> It's a typical result with the patchset:
> 
>  Performance counter stats for './run-mmtests.sh -c configs/config-workload-thpscale pageblock-c':
> 
>              9,564      compaction:mm_compaction_isolate_migratepages
>              6,430      compaction:mm_compaction_isolate_freepages
>              5,287      compaction:mm_compaction_migratepages
>             45,299      compaction:mm_compaction_begin
>             45,299      compaction:mm_compaction_end
>             30,557      compaction:mm_compaction_try_to_compact_pages
>             95,540      compaction:mm_compaction_finished
>            149,379      compaction:mm_compaction_suitable
>                  0      compaction:mm_compaction_deferred
>                  0      compaction:mm_compaction_defer_compaction
>              3,949      compaction:mm_compaction_defer_reset
>                  0      compaction:mm_compaction_kcompactd_sleep
>                  0      compaction:mm_compaction_wakeup_kcompactd
>                  0      compaction:mm_compaction_kcompactd_wake
>                 68      pageblock:hit_cmpxchg
> 
>      113.570974583 seconds time elapsed
> 
>       14.664451000 seconds user
>       96.847116000 seconds sys
> 
> It's 5.9-rc2 base kernel result:
> 
>  Performance counter stats for './run-mmtests.sh -c configs/config-workload-thpscale rc2-e':
> 
>             15,920      compaction:mm_compaction_isolate_migratepages
>             20,523      compaction:mm_compaction_isolate_freepages
>              9,752      compaction:mm_compaction_migratepages
>             27,773      compaction:mm_compaction_begin
>             27,773      compaction:mm_compaction_end
>             16,391      compaction:mm_compaction_try_to_compact_pages
>             62,809      compaction:mm_compaction_finished
>             69,821      compaction:mm_compaction_suitable
>                  0      compaction:mm_compaction_deferred
>                  0      compaction:mm_compaction_defer_compaction
>              7,875      compaction:mm_compaction_defer_reset
>                  0      compaction:mm_compaction_kcompactd_sleep
>                  0      compaction:mm_compaction_wakeup_kcompactd
>                  0      compaction:mm_compaction_kcompactd_wake
>              1,208      pageblock:hit_cmpxchg
> 
>      116.440414591 seconds time elapsed
> 
>       15.326913000 seconds user
>      103.752758000 seconds sys

The runs wildly differ in many of other stats, so I'm not sure they are really
comparable. I guess you could show the fraction of hit_cmpxchg to all cmpxchg.
But there's also danger of tracepoints widening the race window.

In the end what matters is how these 1208 retries contribute to runtime. I doubt
they could be really visible in a 100+ seconds run though.


  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-03  9:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-03  7:01 Alex Shi
2020-09-03  7:01 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] mm/pageblock: remove false sharing in pageblock_flags Alex Shi
2020-09-03  7:01 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] mm/pageblock: work around multiple arch's cmpxchg support issue Alex Shi
2020-09-03  7:29   ` Max Filippov
2020-09-03  8:50     ` Alex Shi
2020-09-10  5:51   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-03  7:24 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] mm/pageblock: mitigation cmpxchg false sharing in pageblock flags Mel Gorman
2020-09-03  8:32   ` Alex Shi
2020-09-03  8:40     ` Alex Shi
2020-09-03  9:00       ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2020-09-03  9:31     ` Mel Gorman
2020-09-03  8:19 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-09-03  9:14   ` Alex Shi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e4c95bf8-508a-3743-4547-1782938670a0@suse.cz \
    --to=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox