Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Fixes for hugetlb and vmalloc on arm64

[Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>]

On 21/02/2025 15:35, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 07:10:32PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>> Will, Ryan,
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 02:04:13PM +0000, Ryan Roberts wrote:
>>> This series contains some fixes for hugetlb on arm64, and is split out from v1
>>> of a wider series at [1]. While the last patch is technically targetting core-mm
>>> and is not directly related to arm64, I'd like to to go via the arm64 tree so
>>> that the wider performance improvement series (v2 to be posted shortly) that
>>> depends on this series doesn't have to be robust to the fix not being present.
>>>
>>> I've included maintainers/reviewers for all the arches that are (trivially)
>>> touched due to the API changes, hoping for some ACKs.
>>
>> These fixes look fine to me and I think we should get them in for 6.14.
>> I think Andrew was ok with them going in via the arm64 tree:
>>
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20250205235219.3c3a4b968087d1386d708b04@linux-foundation.org/
> 
> I think the diffstat looks worse than it really is, as the arch changes
> are reasonably mechanical. I'd like to let it sit in next for a few days
> though, so I'll pick this up once we've resolved my comment on patch #2.

Sounds good to me; if you're happy with my proposal in the patch 2 thread, then
I'll respin.

> 
> Ryan -- did you find all of these issues by inspection, or are you aware
> of anybody hitting them in practice?

All by inspection. So I guess they are not urgent to fix from that perspective.

> 
> Will