linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
To: anish kumar <yesanishhere@gmail.com>,
	corbet@lwn.net, tj@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	ptesarik@suse.com, xavier_qy@163.com, vbabka@suse.cz,
	tintinm2017@gmail.com
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] modernize DMA api documentation
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 22:12:12 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e42a99c5-1229-4bc6-9437-018d9effe371@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241113063425.21042-1-yesanishhere@gmail.com>

Hi--

On 11/12/24 10:34 PM, anish kumar wrote:
> Dear maintainers,
> 
> This patch series is inspired by the ongoing discussion in the following thread:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20241111063847.GB23992@lst.de/
> 
> As part of an effort to modernize the documentation, the first patch in
> this series converts the relevant document to use kernel-doc comments directly
> within the source code, replacing the previous method of manually adding
> documentation. This change will help streamline the documentation workflow and
> ensure it remains synchronized with the code.
> 
> I am still getting below errors and wondering if there is a better
> way to write this patch.
> 
> /home/ANT.AMAZON.COM/anishkmr/Downloads/linux/Documentation/core-api/dma-api:89:  
>     ./mm/dmapool.c:229: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined at  
>     core-api/mm-api:224. Declaration is:  
>     '.. c:function:: struct dma_pool *dma_pool_create (const char *name,  
>     struct device *dev, size_t size, size_t align, size_t boundary)'.
> 
> /home/ANT.AMAZON.COM/anishkmr/Downloads/linux/Documentation/core-api/dma-api:92:  
>     ./mm/dmapool.c:420: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined at  
>     core-api/mm-api:404. Declaration is:  
>     '.. c:function:: void *dma_pool_alloc (struct dma_pool *pool, gfp_t mem_flags,  
>     dma_addr_t *handle)'.
> 
> /home/ANT.AMAZON.COM/anishkmr/Downloads/linux/Documentation/core-api/dma-api:98:  
>     ./mm/dmapool.c:229: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined at  
>     core-api/mm-api:224. Declaration is:  
>     '.. c:function:: struct dma_pool *dma_pool_create (const char *name,  
>     struct device *dev, size_t size, size_t align, size_t boundary)'.
> 
> /home/ANT.AMAZON.COM/anishkmr/Downloads/linux/Documentation/core-api/dma-api:101:  
>     ./mm/dmapool.c:466: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined at  
>     core-api/mm-api:450. Declaration is:  
>     '.. c:function:: void dma_pool_free (struct dma_pool *pool, void *vaddr,  
>     dma_addr_t dma)'.
> 
> /home/ANT.AMAZON.COM/anishkmr/Downloads/linux/Documentation/core-api/dma-api:104:  
>     ./mm/dmapool.c:366: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined at  
>     core-api/mm-api:360.
> 

If you are going to add these APIs in dma-api.rst, you need to remove them from
mm-api.rst (IMO). That should remove these Duplicate warnings.


> Thank you for considering this patch. I look forward to your feedback.
> 
> anish kumar (2):
>   dmapool: Improve dma api kernel-doc comments
>   dmapool: Documentation: use the kernel-doc comment
> 
>  Documentation/core-api/dma-api.rst | 66 ++++++------------------------
>  mm/dmapool.c                       | 40 ++++++++++++------
>  2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-)
> 

-- 
~Randy



      parent reply	other threads:[~2024-11-14  6:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-13  6:34 anish kumar
2024-11-13  6:34 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] dmapool: Improve dma api kernel-doc comments anish kumar
2024-11-13  6:34 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] dmapool: Documentation: use the kernel-doc comment anish kumar
2024-11-14  6:12 ` Randy Dunlap [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e42a99c5-1229-4bc6-9437-018d9effe371@infradead.org \
    --to=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ptesarik@suse.com \
    --cc=tintinm2017@gmail.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=xavier_qy@163.com \
    --cc=yesanishhere@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox