linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>, Hao Li <hao.li@linux.dev>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] mm/slab: fix lockdep warnings with kmalloc_nolock()
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2026 20:03:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e37a697a-7670-4f92-848d-9030712986cc@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aYYm9ICnlB_yu7PS@hyeyoo>

On 2/6/26 18:37, Harry Yoo wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 07, 2026 at 02:13:46AM +0900, Harry Yoo wrote:
>> Hi, I've observed a tw lockdep warnings while testing
>> kmalloc_nolock() in NMI:
>> 
>>   1. Accessing current->mems_allowed_seq seqlock in NMI isn't safe
>>      and lockdep complains.
>> 
>>   2. w/ CONFIG_SLAB_FREELIST_RANDOM, get_random_u32() acquires
>>      a local_lock, which isn't safe in NMI and could cause a deadlock.
>> 
>> Let's fix them.
> 
> I think we should probably add some sort of
> kmalloc_nolock()/kfree_nolock() test cases in lib/tests/slub_kunit.c.

That would be useful, yes!

> These haven't been discovered by bots because (I guess) it is very
> unlikely for bots to somehow trigger those APIs in NMI.
> 
> Also, I forgot to mention that this is based on slab/for-next:
> 
> commit bc33906024eb5955294e28128c3d0f492d2ded5e
> Merge: ec15c383fcda 40fd0acc45d0
> Author: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
> Date:   Thu Jan 29 10:10:50 2026 +0100
> 
>     Merge branch 'slab/for-7.0/sheaves' into slab/for-next
> 
>> Harry Yoo (2):
>>   mm/slab: skip get_from_any_partial() if !allow_spin
>>   mm/slab: use prandom if !allow_spin
>> 
>>  mm/slub.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>>  1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>> 
>> -- 
>> 2.43.0
>> 
> 



      reply	other threads:[~2026-02-09 19:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-06 17:13 Harry Yoo
2026-02-06 17:13 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm/slab: skip get_from_any_partial() if !allow_spin Harry Yoo
2026-02-06 18:10   ` Vlastimil Babka
2026-02-06 19:19     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-02-09  3:18       ` Harry Yoo
2026-02-09 19:03         ` Vlastimil Babka
2026-02-06 17:13 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm/slab: use prandom " Harry Yoo
2026-02-06 18:27   ` Vlastimil Babka
2026-02-06 19:22     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-02-07  1:25       ` Harry Yoo
2026-02-06 17:37 ` [PATCH 0/2] mm/slab: fix lockdep warnings with kmalloc_nolock() Harry Yoo
2026-02-09 19:03   ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e37a697a-7670-4f92-848d-9030712986cc@suse.cz \
    --to=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=cl@gentwo.org \
    --cc=hao.li@linux.dev \
    --cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox