From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D4C7C3A5A6 for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 18:02:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 178F120850 for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 18:02:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nvidia.com header.i=@nvidia.com header.b="d2fknKfO" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 178F120850 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=nvidia.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 89AE16B05CA; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 14:02:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 84B0E6B05CB; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 14:02:15 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 739F16B05CC; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 14:02:15 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0030.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.30]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 531FD6B05CA for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 14:02:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin16.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E9540824CA28 for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 18:02:14 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 75865348188.16.shoes88_4dca61d390137 X-HE-Tag: shoes88_4dca61d390137 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 3721 Received: from hqemgate15.nvidia.com (hqemgate15.nvidia.com [216.228.121.64]) by imf48.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 18:02:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hqpgpgate101.nvidia.com (Not Verified[216.228.121.13]) by hqemgate15.nvidia.com (using TLS: TLSv1.2, DES-CBC3-SHA) id ; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 11:02:15 -0700 Received: from hqmail.nvidia.com ([172.20.161.6]) by hqpgpgate101.nvidia.com (PGP Universal service); Mon, 26 Aug 2019 11:02:13 -0700 X-PGP-Universal: processed; by hqpgpgate101.nvidia.com on Mon, 26 Aug 2019 11:02:13 -0700 Received: from rcampbell-dev.nvidia.com (10.124.1.5) by HQMAIL107.nvidia.com (172.20.187.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 18:02:12 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm/hmm: hmm_range_fault() NULL pointer bug To: Christoph Hellwig CC: , , , , , =?UTF-8?B?SsOpcsO0bWUgR2xpc3Nl?= , Jason Gunthorpe , Andrew Morton References: <20190823221753.2514-1-rcampbell@nvidia.com> <20190823221753.2514-2-rcampbell@nvidia.com> <20190824223754.GA21891@lst.de> X-Nvconfidentiality: public From: Ralph Campbell Message-ID: Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 11:02:12 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190824223754.GA21891@lst.de> X-Originating-IP: [10.124.1.5] X-ClientProxiedBy: HQMAIL111.nvidia.com (172.20.187.18) To HQMAIL107.nvidia.com (172.20.187.13) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nvidia.com; s=n1; t=1566842535; bh=q0XlO0WIP1WKl6O/MutlXE9k/HAHL1+wksVgPZA90XQ=; h=X-PGP-Universal:Subject:To:CC:References:X-Nvconfidentiality:From: Message-ID:Date:User-Agent:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To: X-Originating-IP:X-ClientProxiedBy:Content-Type:Content-Language: Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=d2fknKfO2/+Zv6spaSSH3ujdgxCAZH3q2pr6c/Siwshb41aUxlG/I+6Tyj3fXyYY5 r1ZUUnxreiuxEswRCYLLZsMIXjsrYEZ2qKObAcIzx4lFW+80OBz929fmspCEwePFSM Weh8IBdvRGmAYugnTXZh+qH1U82UBGS1UKNXbJ6ZBS+xJMiQMjfCYuJvF6l51O9pkO O0oy/5uowbDESOjWEqnQfr3ZNPKFAUyr/vq/8JL6L4ZXdjyHlF2eCpi6YaUIhZ26eX tDQ19l3lAZnppu1N//ySuXInwpJ3YqMTeBXQVmBM1ehXjdv0DZYHvm24rrRDsWS3r/ wDuGvR7pgamGw== X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On 8/24/19 3:37 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 03:17:52PM -0700, Ralph Campbell wrote: >> Although hmm_range_fault() calls find_vma() to make sure that a vma exists >> before calling walk_page_range(), hmm_vma_walk_hole() can still be called >> with walk->vma == NULL if the start and end address are not contained >> within the vma range. > > Should we convert to walk_vma_range instead? Or keep walk_page_range > but drop searching the vma ourselves? > > Except for that the patch looks good to me: > > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig > I think keeping the call to walk_page_range() makes sense. Jason is hoping to be able to snapshot a range with & without vmas and have the pfns[] filled with empty/valid entries as appropriate. I plan to repost my patch changing hmm_range_fault() to use walk.test_walk which will remove the call to find_vma(). Jason had some concerns about testing it so that's why I have been working on some HMM self tests before resending it.