From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, tj@kernel.org,
hughd@google.com, khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru,
daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com, yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>, Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
Chris Down <chris@chrisdown.name>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] mm/lru: remove rcu_read_lock to fix performance regression
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 14:02:20 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e286a02f-f377-34a9-a195-b827c54b969d@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191113114045.GZ3016@techsingularity.net>
在 2019/11/13 下午7:40, Mel Gorman 写道:
>> Hi Matthew,
>>
>> Very sorry for your time! The main reasons I use a separate patch since a, Intel 0day asking me to credit their are founding, and I don't know how to give a clearly/elegant explanation for a non-exist regression in a fixed patch. b, this regression is kindly pretty tricky. Maybe it's better saying thanks in version change log of cover-letter?
>>
> Add something like this to the patch
>
> [lkp@intel.com: Fix RCU-related regression reported by LKP robot]
> Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com>
It's a good idea! Thanks a lot, Mel!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-14 6:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-12 14:06 [PATCH v2 0/8] per lruvec lru_lock for memcg Alex Shi
2019-11-12 14:06 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] mm/lru: add per lruvec lock " Alex Shi
2019-11-12 14:06 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] mm/lruvec: add irqsave flags into lruvec struct Alex Shi
2019-11-12 14:06 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] mm/lru: replace pgdat lru_lock with lruvec lock Alex Shi
2019-11-12 14:06 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] mm/lru: only change the lru_lock iff page's lruvec is different Alex Shi
2019-11-12 14:36 ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-11-13 2:26 ` Alex Shi
2019-11-13 13:45 ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-11-14 6:01 ` Alex Shi
2019-11-12 14:06 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] mm/pgdat: remove pgdat lru_lock Alex Shi
2019-11-12 14:06 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] mm/lru: remove rcu_read_lock to fix performance regression Alex Shi
2019-11-12 14:38 ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-11-13 2:40 ` Alex Shi
2019-11-13 11:40 ` Mel Gorman
2019-11-14 6:02 ` Alex Shi [this message]
2019-11-12 14:06 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] mm/lru: likely enhancement Alex Shi
2019-11-12 14:06 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] mm/lru: revise the comments of lru_lock Alex Shi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e286a02f-f377-34a9-a195-b827c54b969d@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chris@chrisdown.name \
--cc=daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox