From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
To: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>, Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>,
Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>,
Steve Capper <steve.capper@linaro.org>,
Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 03/16] arm64: hugetlb: Fix flush_hugetlb_tlb_range() invalidation level
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2025 12:16:02 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e2809c59-6453-4a90-88ad-0b22e82f869f@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250205151003.88959-4-ryan.roberts@arm.com>
On 2/5/25 20:39, Ryan Roberts wrote:
> commit c910f2b65518 ("arm64/mm: Update tlb invalidation routines for
> FEAT_LPA2") changed the "invalidation level unknown" hint from 0 to
> TLBI_TTL_UNKNOWN (INT_MAX). But the fallback "unknown level" path in
> flush_hugetlb_tlb_range() was not updated. So as it stands, when trying
> to invalidate CONT_PMD_SIZE or CONT_PTE_SIZE hugetlb mappings, we will
> spuriously try to invalidate at level 0 on LPA2-enabled systems.
>
> Fix this so that the fallback passes TLBI_TTL_UNKNOWN, and while we are
> at it, explicitly use the correct stride and level for CONT_PMD_SIZE and
> CONT_PTE_SIZE, which should provide a minor optimization.
>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> Fixes: c910f2b65518 ("arm64/mm: Update tlb invalidation routines for FEAT_LPA2")
> Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/hugetlb.h | 20 ++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/hugetlb.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/hugetlb.h
> index 03db9cb21ace..8ab9542d2d22 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/hugetlb.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/hugetlb.h
> @@ -76,12 +76,20 @@ static inline void flush_hugetlb_tlb_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> {
> unsigned long stride = huge_page_size(hstate_vma(vma));
>
> - if (stride == PMD_SIZE)
> - __flush_tlb_range(vma, start, end, stride, false, 2);
> - else if (stride == PUD_SIZE)
> - __flush_tlb_range(vma, start, end, stride, false, 1);
> - else
> - __flush_tlb_range(vma, start, end, PAGE_SIZE, false, 0);
> + switch (stride) {
> + case PUD_SIZE:
> + __flush_tlb_range(vma, start, end, PUD_SIZE, false, 1);
> + break;
Just wondering - should not !__PAGETABLE_PMD_FOLDED and pud_sect_supported()
checks also be added here for this PUD_SIZE case ?
> + case CONT_PMD_SIZE:
> + case PMD_SIZE:
> + __flush_tlb_range(vma, start, end, PMD_SIZE, false, 2);
> + break;
> + case CONT_PTE_SIZE:
> + __flush_tlb_range(vma, start, end, PAGE_SIZE, false, 3);
> + break;
> + default:
> + __flush_tlb_range(vma, start, end, PAGE_SIZE, false, TLBI_TTL_UNKNOWN);
> + }
> }
>
> #endif /* __ASM_HUGETLB_H */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-06 6:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-05 15:09 [PATCH v1 00/16] hugetlb and vmalloc fixes and perf improvements Ryan Roberts
2025-02-05 15:09 ` [PATCH v1 01/16] mm: hugetlb: Add huge page size param to huge_ptep_get_and_clear() Ryan Roberts
2025-02-06 5:03 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-02-06 12:15 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-02-05 15:09 ` [PATCH v1 02/16] arm64: hugetlb: Fix huge_ptep_get_and_clear() for non-present ptes Ryan Roberts
2025-02-06 6:15 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-02-06 12:55 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-02-12 14:44 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-02-05 15:09 ` [PATCH v1 03/16] arm64: hugetlb: Fix flush_hugetlb_tlb_range() invalidation level Ryan Roberts
2025-02-06 6:46 ` Anshuman Khandual [this message]
2025-02-06 13:04 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-02-13 4:57 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-02-05 15:09 ` [PATCH v1 04/16] arm64: hugetlb: Refine tlb maintenance scope Ryan Roberts
2025-02-05 15:09 ` [PATCH v1 05/16] mm/page_table_check: Batch-check pmds/puds just like ptes Ryan Roberts
2025-02-06 10:55 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-02-06 13:07 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-02-05 15:09 ` [PATCH v1 06/16] arm64/mm: Refactor __set_ptes() and __ptep_get_and_clear() Ryan Roberts
2025-02-06 11:48 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-02-06 13:26 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-02-07 9:38 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-02-12 15:29 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-02-05 15:09 ` [PATCH v1 07/16] arm64: hugetlb: Use ___set_ptes() and ___ptep_get_and_clear() Ryan Roberts
2025-02-07 4:09 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-02-07 10:00 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-02-05 15:09 ` [PATCH v1 08/16] arm64/mm: Hoist barriers out of ___set_ptes() loop Ryan Roberts
2025-02-07 5:35 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-02-07 10:38 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-02-12 16:00 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-02-05 15:09 ` [PATCH v1 09/16] arm64/mm: Avoid barriers for invalid or userspace mappings Ryan Roberts
2025-02-07 8:11 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-02-07 10:53 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-02-12 16:48 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-02-05 15:09 ` [PATCH v1 10/16] mm/vmalloc: Warn on improper use of vunmap_range() Ryan Roberts
2025-02-07 8:41 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-02-07 10:59 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-02-13 6:36 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-02-05 15:09 ` [PATCH v1 11/16] mm/vmalloc: Gracefully unmap huge ptes Ryan Roberts
2025-02-07 9:19 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-02-05 15:09 ` [PATCH v1 12/16] arm64/mm: Support huge pte-mapped pages in vmap Ryan Roberts
2025-02-07 10:04 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-02-07 11:20 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-02-13 6:32 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-02-13 9:09 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-02-17 4:33 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-02-05 15:09 ` [PATCH v1 13/16] mm: Don't skip arch_sync_kernel_mappings() in error paths Ryan Roberts
2025-02-07 10:21 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-02-05 15:09 ` [PATCH v1 14/16] mm/vmalloc: Batch arch_sync_kernel_mappings() more efficiently Ryan Roberts
2025-02-10 7:11 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-02-05 15:09 ` [PATCH v1 15/16] mm: Generalize arch_sync_kernel_mappings() Ryan Roberts
2025-02-10 7:45 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-02-10 11:04 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-02-13 5:57 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-02-13 9:17 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-02-05 15:09 ` [PATCH v1 16/16] arm64/mm: Defer barriers when updating kernel mappings Ryan Roberts
2025-02-10 8:03 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-02-10 11:12 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-02-13 5:30 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-02-13 9:38 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-02-17 4:48 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-02-17 9:40 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-02-06 7:52 ` [PATCH v1 00/16] hugetlb and vmalloc fixes and perf improvements Andrew Morton
2025-02-06 11:59 ` Ryan Roberts
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e2809c59-6453-4a90-88ad-0b22e82f869f@arm.com \
--to=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexghiti@rivosinc.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=steve.capper@linaro.org \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox