From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Jinjiang Tu <tujinjiang@huawei.com>,
osalvador@suse.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
nao.horiguchi@gmail.com, zi.yan@cs.rutgers.edu
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com, sunnanyong@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/memory_hotplug: fix call folio_test_large with tail page in do_migrate_range
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 20:05:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e14d5872-351a-41b1-8717-54faa29b82a7@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <68ab727b-dc3d-327f-33b6-25bbfce8530e@huawei.com>
On 25.03.25 04:02, Jinjiang Tu wrote:
>
> 在 2025/3/24 21:44, David Hildenbrand 写道:
>> On 24.03.25 14:17, Jinjiang Tu wrote:
>>> We triggered the below BUG:
>>>
>>> page: refcount:0 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x2
>>> pfn:0x240402
>>> head: order:9 mapcount:0 entire_mapcount:0 nr_pages_mapped:0
>>> pincount:0
>>> flags: 0x1ffffe0000000040(head|node=1|zone=3|lastcpupid=0x1ffff)
>>> page_type: f4(hugetlb)
>>> page dumped because: VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(page->compound_head & 1)
>>> ------------[ cut here ]------------
>>> kernel BUG at ./include/linux/page-flags.h:310!
>>> Internal error: Oops - BUG: 00000000f2000800 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
>>> Modules linked in:
>>> CPU: 7 UID: 0 PID: 166 Comm: sh Not tainted 6.14.0-rc7-dirty #374
>>> Hardware name: QEMU QEMU Virtual Machine, BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015
>>> pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
>>> pc : const_folio_flags+0x3c/0x58
>>> lr : const_folio_flags+0x3c/0x58
>>> Call trace:
>>> const_folio_flags+0x3c/0x58 (P)
>>> do_migrate_range+0x164/0x720
>>> offline_pages+0x63c/0x6fc
>>> memory_subsys_offline+0x190/0x1f4
>>> device_offline+0xc0/0x13c
>>> state_store+0x90/0xd8
>>> dev_attr_store+0x18/0x2c
>>> sysfs_kf_write+0x44/0x54
>>> kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x120/0x1cc
>>> vfs_write+0x240/0x378
>>> ksys_write+0x70/0x108
>>> __arm64_sys_write+0x1c/0x28
>>> invoke_syscall+0x48/0x10c
>>> el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x40/0xe0
>>>
>>> When allocating a hugetlb folio, between the folio is taken from buddy
>>> and prep_compound_page() is called, start_isolate_page_range() and
>>> do_migrate_range() is called. When do_migrate_range() scans the head
>>> page
>>> of the hugetlb folio, the compound_head field isn't set, so scans the
>>> tail page next. And at this time, the compound_head field of tail
>>> page is
>>> set, folio_test_large() is called by tail page, thus triggers
>>> VM_BUG_ON().
>>>
>>> To fix it, get folio refcount before calling folio_test_large().
>>>
>>> Fixes: 8135d8926c08 ("mm: memory_hotplug: memory hotremove supports
>>> thp migration")
>>> Signed-off-by: Jinjiang Tu <tujinjiang@huawei.com>
>>> ---
>>> mm/memory_hotplug.c | 12 +++---------
>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>>> index 16cf9e17077e..f600c26ce5de 100644
>>> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>>> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>>> @@ -1813,21 +1813,15 @@ static void do_migrate_range(unsigned long
>>> start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
>>> page = pfn_to_page(pfn);
>>> folio = page_folio(page);
>>> - /*
>>> - * No reference or lock is held on the folio, so it might
>>> - * be modified concurrently (e.g. split). As such,
>>> - * folio_nr_pages() may read garbage. This is fine as the
>>> outer
>>> - * loop will revisit the split folio later.
>>> - */
>>> - if (folio_test_large(folio))
>>> - pfn = folio_pfn(folio) + folio_nr_pages(folio) - 1;
>>> -
>>> if (!folio_try_get(folio))
>>> continue;
>>> if (unlikely(page_folio(page) != folio))
>>> goto put_folio;
>>> + if (folio_test_large(folio))
>>> + pfn = folio_pfn(folio) + folio_nr_pages(folio) - 1;
>>
>> Moving that will not make it able to skip the large frozen
>> (refcount==0, e.g., free hugetlb) folio in the continue/put_folio case
>> above. Hmmmm ..
> For free hugetlb, pfn is increased by 1 in each loop. This leads to skip
> free hugetlb slower.
Yes. But now I realize that we have the same issue with free buddy pages
already (folio_try_get of each individual page :( ).
>>
>> We could similarly to dumping folios, snapshot them, so we can read
>> stable data.
> extract the code in __dump_page()? But snapshot may lead to
> do_migrate_range() slower too.
There is a patch series on the list to do that, but it might take a
while to clean that up. Ideally, we'd also jump over free buddy pages.
In the future we might have better ways to do that.
I don't consider this change here really important, but if all it
affects is free hugetlb folios, it's not really worth it to have this
code around.
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
But: I suspect 8135d8926c08 is not the introducing commit. Please re-verify.
We should not CC stable.
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-25 19:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-24 13:17 Jinjiang Tu
2025-03-24 13:44 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-03-25 3:02 ` Jinjiang Tu
2025-03-25 13:18 ` Oscar Salvador
2025-03-25 19:05 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2025-03-26 2:40 ` Jinjiang Tu
2025-03-26 12:53 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-03-27 11:19 ` Jinjiang Tu
2025-03-28 23:37 ` Andrew Morton
2025-04-01 16:44 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-07 1:59 ` Andrew Morton
2025-04-07 7:07 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-03-28 13:23 ` Oscar Salvador
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e14d5872-351a-41b1-8717-54faa29b82a7@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nao.horiguchi@gmail.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=sunnanyong@huawei.com \
--cc=tujinjiang@huawei.com \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=zi.yan@cs.rutgers.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox