linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Jinjiang Tu <tujinjiang@huawei.com>,
	osalvador@suse.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	nao.horiguchi@gmail.com, zi.yan@cs.rutgers.edu
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com, sunnanyong@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/memory_hotplug: fix call folio_test_large with tail page in do_migrate_range
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 20:05:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e14d5872-351a-41b1-8717-54faa29b82a7@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <68ab727b-dc3d-327f-33b6-25bbfce8530e@huawei.com>

On 25.03.25 04:02, Jinjiang Tu wrote:
> 
> 在 2025/3/24 21:44, David Hildenbrand 写道:
>> On 24.03.25 14:17, Jinjiang Tu wrote:
>>> We triggered the below BUG:
>>>
>>>    page: refcount:0 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x2
>>> pfn:0x240402
>>>    head: order:9 mapcount:0 entire_mapcount:0 nr_pages_mapped:0
>>> pincount:0
>>>    flags: 0x1ffffe0000000040(head|node=1|zone=3|lastcpupid=0x1ffff)
>>>    page_type: f4(hugetlb)
>>>    page dumped because: VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(page->compound_head & 1)
>>>    ------------[ cut here ]------------
>>>    kernel BUG at ./include/linux/page-flags.h:310!
>>>    Internal error: Oops - BUG: 00000000f2000800 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
>>>    Modules linked in:
>>>    CPU: 7 UID: 0 PID: 166 Comm: sh Not tainted 6.14.0-rc7-dirty #374
>>>    Hardware name: QEMU QEMU Virtual Machine, BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015
>>>    pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
>>>    pc : const_folio_flags+0x3c/0x58
>>>    lr : const_folio_flags+0x3c/0x58
>>>    Call trace:
>>>     const_folio_flags+0x3c/0x58 (P)
>>>     do_migrate_range+0x164/0x720
>>>     offline_pages+0x63c/0x6fc
>>>     memory_subsys_offline+0x190/0x1f4
>>>     device_offline+0xc0/0x13c
>>>     state_store+0x90/0xd8
>>>     dev_attr_store+0x18/0x2c
>>>     sysfs_kf_write+0x44/0x54
>>>     kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x120/0x1cc
>>>     vfs_write+0x240/0x378
>>>     ksys_write+0x70/0x108
>>>     __arm64_sys_write+0x1c/0x28
>>>     invoke_syscall+0x48/0x10c
>>>     el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x40/0xe0
>>>
>>> When allocating a hugetlb folio, between the folio is taken from buddy
>>> and prep_compound_page() is called, start_isolate_page_range() and
>>> do_migrate_range() is called. When do_migrate_range() scans the head
>>> page
>>> of the hugetlb folio, the compound_head field isn't set, so scans the
>>> tail page next. And at this time, the compound_head field of tail
>>> page is
>>> set, folio_test_large() is called by tail page, thus triggers
>>> VM_BUG_ON().
>>>
>>> To fix it, get folio refcount before calling folio_test_large().
>>>
>>> Fixes: 8135d8926c08 ("mm: memory_hotplug: memory hotremove supports
>>> thp migration")
>>> Signed-off-by: Jinjiang Tu <tujinjiang@huawei.com>
>>> ---
>>>    mm/memory_hotplug.c | 12 +++---------
>>>    1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>>> index 16cf9e17077e..f600c26ce5de 100644
>>> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>>> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>>> @@ -1813,21 +1813,15 @@ static void do_migrate_range(unsigned long
>>> start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
>>>            page = pfn_to_page(pfn);
>>>            folio = page_folio(page);
>>>    -        /*
>>> -         * No reference or lock is held on the folio, so it might
>>> -         * be modified concurrently (e.g. split).  As such,
>>> -         * folio_nr_pages() may read garbage.  This is fine as the
>>> outer
>>> -         * loop will revisit the split folio later.
>>> -         */
>>> -        if (folio_test_large(folio))
>>> -            pfn = folio_pfn(folio) + folio_nr_pages(folio) - 1;
>>> -
>>>            if (!folio_try_get(folio))
>>>                continue;
>>>              if (unlikely(page_folio(page) != folio))
>>>                goto put_folio;
>>>    +        if (folio_test_large(folio))
>>> +            pfn = folio_pfn(folio) + folio_nr_pages(folio) - 1;
>>
>> Moving that will not make it able to skip the large frozen
>> (refcount==0, e.g., free hugetlb) folio in the continue/put_folio case
>> above. Hmmmm ..
> For free hugetlb, pfn is increased by 1 in each loop. This leads to skip
> free hugetlb slower.

Yes. But now I realize that we have the same issue with free buddy pages 
already (folio_try_get of each individual page :( ).

>>
>> We could similarly to dumping folios, snapshot them, so we can read
>> stable data.
> extract the code in __dump_page()? But snapshot may lead to
> do_migrate_range() slower too.

There is a patch series on the list to do that, but it might take a 
while to clean that up. Ideally, we'd also jump over free buddy pages. 
In the future we might have better ways to do that.

I don't consider this change here really important, but if all it 
affects is free hugetlb folios, it's not really worth it to have this 
code around.

Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>

But: I suspect 8135d8926c08 is not the introducing commit. Please re-verify.

We should not CC stable.

-- 
Cheers,

David / dhildenb



  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-03-25 19:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-24 13:17 Jinjiang Tu
2025-03-24 13:44 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-03-25  3:02   ` Jinjiang Tu
2025-03-25 13:18     ` Oscar Salvador
2025-03-25 19:05     ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2025-03-26  2:40       ` Jinjiang Tu
2025-03-26 12:53         ` David Hildenbrand
2025-03-27 11:19           ` Jinjiang Tu
2025-03-28 23:37       ` Andrew Morton
2025-04-01 16:44         ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-07  1:59           ` Andrew Morton
2025-04-07  7:07             ` David Hildenbrand
2025-03-28 13:23 ` Oscar Salvador

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e14d5872-351a-41b1-8717-54faa29b82a7@redhat.com \
    --to=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=nao.horiguchi@gmail.com \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=sunnanyong@huawei.com \
    --cc=tujinjiang@huawei.com \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=zi.yan@cs.rutgers.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox