linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Donet Tom <donettom@linux.ibm.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>, Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
	rafael@kernel.org, Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
	Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
	Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>,
	Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
	Donet Tom <donettom@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 3/4] Remove register_memory_blocks_under_node() function call from register_one_node
Date: Fri, 16 May 2025 03:19:53 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e0ef6ae9348f46bcc135f0e6cb7663d763e40b72.1747376551.git.donettom@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f94685be9cdc931a026999d236d7e92de29725c7.1747376551.git.donettom@linux.ibm.com>

register_one_node() is now only called via cpu_up() → __try_online_node()
during CPU hotplug operations to online a node. At this stage, the node has
not yet had any memory added. As a result, there are no memory blocks to
walk or register, so calling register_memory_blocks_under_node() is
unnecessary. Therefore, the call to register_memory_blocks_under_node()
has been removed from register_one_node().

Signed-off-by: Donet Tom <donettom@linux.ibm.com>

---
v3->v4

Addressed Mike's comment by dropping the call to
register_memory_blocks_under_node() from register_one_node()

v3 - https://lore.kernel.org/all/b49ed289096643ff5b5fbedcf1d1c1be42845a74.1746250339.git.donettom@linux.ibm.com/
v2 - https://lore.kernel.org/all/fbe1e0c7d91bf3fa9a64ff5d84b53ded1d0d5ac7.1745852397.git.donettom@linux.ibm.com/
v1 - https://lore.kernel.org/all/50142a29010463f436dc5c4feb540e5de3bb09df.1744175097.git.donettom@linux.ibm.com/
---
 include/linux/node.h | 6 ------
 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/node.h b/include/linux/node.h
index 806e62638cbe..8b8f96ca5b06 100644
--- a/include/linux/node.h
+++ b/include/linux/node.h
@@ -137,15 +137,9 @@ static inline int register_one_node(int nid)
 	int error = 0;
 
 	if (node_online(nid)) {
-		struct pglist_data *pgdat = NODE_DATA(nid);
-		unsigned long start_pfn = pgdat->node_start_pfn;
-		unsigned long end_pfn = start_pfn + pgdat->node_spanned_pages;
-
 		error = __register_one_node(nid);
 		if (error)
 			return error;
-		register_memory_blocks_under_node(nid, start_pfn, end_pfn,
-						  MEMINIT_EARLY);
 	}
 
 	return error;
-- 
2.43.5



  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-05-16  8:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-16  8:19 [PATCH v4 1/4] driver/base: Optimize memory block registration to reduce boot time Donet Tom
2025-05-16  8:19 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] driver/base: remove register_mem_block_under_node_early() Donet Tom
2025-05-16 10:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2025-05-20 10:05   ` Oscar Salvador
2025-05-16  8:19 ` Donet Tom [this message]
2025-05-16  9:18   ` [PATCH v4 3/4] Remove register_memory_blocks_under_node() function call from register_one_node David Hildenbrand
2025-05-16 10:58     ` Donet Tom
2025-05-16 10:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2025-05-20 10:06   ` Oscar Salvador
2025-05-16  8:19 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] drivers/base : Rename register_memory_blocks_under_node() and remove context argument Donet Tom
2025-05-16  9:18   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-16 10:11   ` Mike Rapoport
2025-05-20 10:07   ` Oscar Salvador
2025-05-16  9:15 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] driver/base: Optimize memory block registration to reduce boot time David Hildenbrand
2025-05-16 10:09   ` Mike Rapoport
2025-05-16 10:12     ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-16 11:00       ` Donet Tom
2025-05-16 11:00   ` Donet Tom

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e0ef6ae9348f46bcc135f0e6cb7663d763e40b72.1747376551.git.donettom@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=donettom@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
    --cc=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox